Wittenberg Door Campus Ministry
  • Home
  • About
    • About Wittenberg CoMo
    • Support Us
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    • Christianity 101
    • Greek Tutorials
  • Blog
  • Calendar
    • Events
  • Recording Archives
  • Sandbox

Sources in Orality?

7/19/2019

0 Comments

 
Friday is Didache day.
7/19/19
Milavec, Aaron. The Didache: Faith, Hope, & Life of the Earliest Christian Communities, 50-70 C.E. New York: The Newman Press, 2003.
Chapter 11 “Whether the Didache Made Use of Any Known Gospel” pp. 693-739, part 2.

Since verbal similarity is not a reliable measure of dependence, Milavec asks whether the similarity of ideas could indicate the Didache’s dependence on a written gospel (Milavec 2003, 704). The reference of Didache 9:5 to avoid giving “what is holy to dogs” finds a strong verbal parallel in Matthew 7:6 (Milavec 2003, 704). However, the context and implications of the statements are significantly different (Milavec 2003, 705). Likewise, Didache 8:1-2 warns against fasting like hypocrites. Matthew 6:5 has a similar warning against praying like hypocrites (Milavec 2003, 706). The idea is similar but the setting is considerably different. Didache 14:1 and 15:3 speak of confessing sins and shunning those who have gone astray. This is very different from the process described in Matthew 18:15-18. So again, the ideas are similar but the accounts are clearly different.  Didache 3:1-6 gives a series of commands, then shows how to keep the commands (Milavec 2003, 707). Matthew, however, states a number of divine commands then strengthens them. Again, the texts show no awareness of one another. Again, in Didache 6:2, the yoke of God is used very differently than in Matthew 11:29. Didache 6:3 speaks of meat offered to idols but shows no awareness of Matthew 15:10 where God’s people eat what they need to eat. Finally, Matthew 12:32 sees the speaking against the Holy Spirit as unforgiveable. However, in Didache the unforgiveable sin is to judge a prophet who is speaking rightly (Milavec 2003, 707). Another important concept is that of the “double love” commandment, in which we are to love God and our neighbor (Milavec 2003, 708). Matthew 22:37 states it clearly. Milavec finds only a partial parallel in Didache 1:2, where we are told to love God (Milavec 2003, 709). The ideas are vaguely similar but certainly not identical.

Milavec continues making comparison of the Didache and Matthew’s Gospel by considering the idea of turning the other cheek (Milavec 2003, 710). The discussion assumes that there were contemporary collections of Jesus’ sayings and that these may have supplied the material. It is unclear, in Milavec’s opinion, whether the portions of the Two Ways which strongly evoke the Sermon on the Mount are later insertions (Milavec 2003, 711). However, the basic consideration of dependence on a Gospel is not influenced by the date of inclusion of ideas (Milavec 2003, 712). To evaluate the similarities, Milavec places Didache 1:4-5a and Matthew 5:38-42 parallel to each other (Milavec 2003, 712). The sayings are similar but they are used to demonstrate different ideas (Milavec 2003, 713). The comparison continues with Luke 6:27-32 (Milavec 2003, 714). The texts are similar in their ideas but do not have the marks of direct dependence (Milavec 2003, 715).

One of the difficulties which Milavec finds when evaluating arguments of dependence is a bias toward purely textual sources (Milavec 2003, 716). In a culture which values oral sources as highly as or even more highly than written sources, one could expect that oral sources would be used freely, even with some verbal fluidity. This would be a perfectly reasonable way of making quotations. An adequate view of orality can also explain the fluidity of apparent source material used for the canonical Gospels. It would allow the evangelists to “quote” sayings of Jesus but with verbal freedom (Milavec 2003, 717). Milavec observes that an oral tradition could well explain the appearance of a Way of Life narrative generally following the same organization in many different documents (Milavec 2003, 718). Milavec further note that the Didache shows signs of being an oral composition, intended for oral transmission. It repeatedly refers to speaking and hearing, not writing and reading (Milavec 2003, 719). However, unlike the work of Jesus in the Gospels, where the disciples gradually take on their master’s values, the Didache has a clear progression of sayings which would be mastered (Milavec 2003, 720). The syaings do not need to be statements of Jesus. It is sufficient that they speak of godly conduct. The term “gospel” also appears nt to refer to a text, but to the message of Jesus. Milavec pursues this concept more, by analyzing the four times the word euaggelion is used (Milavec 2003, 721). Much of his argument is predicated on the idea that “gospel” is not used for a written source prior to about 150.

Milavec concludes that the authors of the Didache either had no written gospel account or considered the written sources unneeded. Otherwise, we would expect to see much more in paralllel with a canonical gospel (Milavec 2003, 724).

The possible exception to the rule of the Didache being largely independent of the canonical gospels is Didache 16 which seems to have many parallels in Matthew 24 (Milavec 2003, 725). However, when Milavec puts the two texts in parallel columns, it becomes apparent that there is relatively little actual dependence (Milavec 2003, 726-728). The conclusion Milavec reache is that the texts treat similar topics but in their own ays and for their own reasons (Milavec 2003, 729). In a similar way, Matthew 24:30 and Revelation 1:7 appear similar in content but not directly related to one another (Milavec 2003, 730).

Milavec describes the work of Vicky Balabanski at some length. Balabanski maintains that Didache 16 “was written ‘to clarify and specify’” elements of Matthew (Milavec 2003, 731). Her view is that though Matthew’s Gospel is relatively comprehensive, Didache 16 intended to summarize the eschatology (Milavec 2003, 732). However, Milavec observes, she tends to presume a unity of purpose which cannot be found explicitly in either text. Milavec gives numerous examples of Balabanski’s assertions. In the given examples, Balabanski demonstrates points of difference between Matthew and Didache 16. This does not, therefore, appear to be a work for the purpose of clarification.

Another scholar, John S. Kloppenborg, finds that Didache 16 focuses on material for which the content is present in Matthew but not in Mark. This suggests to him that Matthew and the Didache had access to some traditions unknown to Mark (Milavec 2003, 735). He suggests the contents of the source, but possibly assumes all the source’s contents were used.

In conclusion, Milavec finds textual similarity between the Didache and Matthew’s Gospel. However, the similarities do not demonstrate dependence (Milavec 2003, 738). Similarly, though some cntent elemtns are similar, they are not consistently used in the same ways and cannot demonstrate dependence in either direction. Milavec sees them as representatives of two divergent and independent religious systems (Milavec 2003, 739).

​
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    ​Help Fuel This Ministry by Clicking Here!

    All the work of Wittenberg Door Campus Ministry, including this blog, is supported by the generosity of people like you. Please consider joining our team of prayer and financial supporters. Read more here!
    Please Note: The opinions presented in blog posts are not necessarily those of Wittenberg Door Campus Ministry. Frequently we report on contrary views, often without comment. Please chime in on the discussion.

    About Throwing Inkwells

    When Martin Luther was dealing with struggles in his life he once saw what appeared to be an angelic being. Not trusting that he was going to be informed by someone other than the God revealed in Scripture, he took the appearance to be untrustworthy and hurled his inkwell at it. The chipped place in the plaster wall is still visible at the Wartburg Castle, though apparently the ink stain on the wall has been refreshed periodically by the caretaker.

    Blog Feeds

    RSS Feed

    Want to keep up with what's happening at Wittenberg Door? Subscribe to our mailing list!

    Categories

    All
    1 Corinthians
    1 John
    1 Kings
    1 Peter
    1 Samuel
    1 Thessalonians
    1 Timothy
    2019-02-feb
    2 Chronicles
    2 Corinthians
    2-john
    2-kings
    2 Peter
    2 Samuel
    2 Thessalonians
    2 Timothy
    3-john
    Academic-success
    Acts
    Advent 1
    Advent-1-a
    Advent-1b
    Advent-1c
    Advent 2
    Advent-2-a
    Advent-2b
    Advent-2c
    Advent 3
    Advent-3-a
    Advent-3b
    Advent-3c
    Advent 4
    Advent-4-a
    Advent-4b
    Advent-4c
    Alesso-2009
    Alexander 1999
    Allitt-2010
    Alon 1996
    Amos
    Aristotle
    Audet 1996
    Augustine
    Bakker 1993
    Bammel 1996
    Baptism Of Christ
    Baptism-of-the-lord-b
    Bauckham 2006
    Belonging
    Ben-Amos 1999
    Betz 1996
    Biesenthal 1893
    Boehme-2010
    Braaten 2007
    Bruce1988
    Bruce-1988
    Bryennios
    Butler 1960
    Canonicity
    Capon1998
    Capon-1998
    Carson-1991
    Carson-moo-2005
    Catholicism
    Christmas-1b
    Christmas-1c
    Christmas Dawn
    Christmas-day
    Christmas Eve
    Christmas Midnight
    Chronicles
    Circumcision And Naming Of Christ
    Colossians
    Confessions
    Connolly 1932
    Connolly 1933
    Connolly 1934
    Constanza-2013
    Culley 1986
    Daniel
    DeHalleux 1996
    Deuteronomy
    Didache
    Diversity
    Dix 1933
    Dix2005
    Dix-2005
    Doane 1994
    Draper
    Draper 1989
    Draper 1995
    Draper 1996
    Easter 2
    Easter-2a
    Easter2b
    Easter-2c
    Easter 3
    Easter-3a
    Easter-3b
    Easter-3c
    Easter 4
    Easter-4a
    Easter-4b
    Easter-4c
    Easter 5
    Easter-5a
    Easter-5b
    Easter 6
    Easter-6a
    Easter-6b
    Easter-6c
    Easter 7
    Easter-7a
    Easter-7b
    Easter-7c
    Easter-b
    Easter Day
    Easter-sunday-a
    Easter-sunday-c
    Ecclesiastes
    Eleutheria-2014
    Ephesians
    Epiphany-1c
    Epiphany-2-a
    Epiphany-2c
    Epiphany-3-a
    Epiphany-3b
    Epiphany-3c
    Epiphany-4-a
    Epiphany-4b
    Epiphany-4c
    Epiphany-5-a
    Epiphany-5b
    Epiphany-5c
    Epiphany-6-a
    Epiphany-6c
    Epiphany-7-a
    Epiphany-c
    Epistle Of Barnabas
    Esther
    Eucharist
    Eve Of The Circumcision Of Christ
    Exodus
    Exodus-20
    Ezekiel
    Ezra
    Fagerberg1988
    Fagerberg-1988
    Farrell 1987
    Flew-2007
    Flusser 1996
    Forde-2007
    France-2007
    Galatians
    Genesis
    Gibbs 2006
    Glover 1958
    Gonzalez-2010
    Grosvener & Schaff 1885
    Grosvenor 1884
    Habakkuk
    Haggai
    Harnack 1884
    Hebrews
    Henderson 1992
    Henderson-1992
    History
    Hoffman 1986
    Holy Innocents
    Hosea
    Hutchens-2013
    Hymes 1994
    Infertility
    Isaiah
    James
    Jeffreys 1986
    Jeremiah
    Jerome
    Job
    Joel
    John
    Jonah
    Joshua
    Jude
    Judges
    Jungmann 1959
    Justin-martyr
    Kelber 1987
    Kelber 1995
    Kevil
    Kings
    Kleinig-2013
    Koch-2010
    Kolb2000
    Kolb-2000
    Kolbarand2008
    Kolb-arand-2008
    Kurekchomycz2009
    Lamentations
    Last Sunday Of The Church Year
    Last-sunday-of-the-church-year-a
    Last-sunday-of-the-church-year-b
    Last Sunday Of The Church Year C
    Lectionary
    Lent 1
    Lent-1-a
    Lent-1b
    Lent-1c
    Lent 2
    Lent-2-a
    Lent-2b
    Lent-2c
    Lent 3
    Lent-3-a
    Lent-3b
    Lent-3c
    Lent 4
    Lent-4-a
    Lent-4b
    Lent-4c
    Lent 5
    Lent-5-a
    Lent-5b
    Lent-5c
    Lessing2014
    Lessing-2014
    Leviticus
    Lincoln 1885
    Long-2009
    Lord 1986
    Lord 1987
    Luke
    Luther
    Maas-2014
    Malachi
    Mark
    Marty-2016
    Martyrs
    Mason 1998
    Matthew
    Matthias
    Mazza 1996
    Mcknight-2014
    Micah
    Milavec-2003
    Milavec-2012
    Mitch-2010
    Molina & Evers 1998
    Montenyohl 1993
    Morris-1992
    Motyer-1993
    Mueller 2006
    Music
    Nahum
    Nehemiah
    Newsletter
    Newtestament
    New Testament
    Niditch 1995
    Niederwimmer 1996
    Numbers
    Obadiah
    Oldtestament
    Old Testament
    Olsen 1986
    Ong 1987
    Ong 1988
    Ong 1995
    Orality
    Ordination
    Orphan-hosting
    Osborne-2002
    Osborne-2013
    Ozment1980
    Ozment-1980
    Palm-sunday-a
    Palm-sunday-c
    Parks 1986
    Passionb
    Pearce 1993
    Pentateuch
    Pentecost-10a
    Pentecost-10b
    Pentecost-10c
    Pentecost-11a
    Pentecost-11b
    Pentecost-11c
    Pentecost-12a
    Pentecost-12b
    Pentecost-12c
    Pentecost-13a
    Pentecost-13b
    Pentecost13c
    Pentecost-13c
    Pentecost-14a
    Pentecost-14b
    Pentecost-14c
    Pentecost-15
    Pentecost-15a
    Pentecost-15b
    Pentecost-15c
    Pentecost-16
    Pentecost-16a
    Pentecost-16b
    Pentecost 16C
    Pentecost-17a
    Pentecost-17b
    Pentecost 17C
    Pentecost-18a
    Pentecost-18b
    Pentecost 18 C
    Pentecost-19a
    Pentecost-19b
    Pentecost 19 C
    Pentecost-1a
    Pentecost-20a
    Pentecost-20b
    Pentecost 20 C
    Pentecost-21a
    Pentecost-21b
    Pentecost 21 C
    Pentecost-22a
    Pentecost-22b
    Pentecost 22 C
    Pentecost-23a
    Pentecost-23b
    Pentecost 23 C
    Pentecost-24a
    Pentecost-24b
    Pentecost-24-c
    Pentecost-25b
    Pentecost-25-c
    Pentecost-26b
    Pentecost-26-c
    Pentecost-2a
    Pentecost-2b
    Pentecost-2c
    Pentecost-3a
    Pentecost-3b
    Pentecost-3c
    Pentecost-4a
    Pentecost-4b
    Pentecost-4c
    Pentecost-5a
    Pentecost-5b
    Pentecost-5c
    Pentecost-6a
    Pentecost-6b
    Pentecost-6c
    Pentecost-7a
    Pentecost-7b
    Pentecost-7c
    Pentecost-8a
    Pentecost-8b
    Pentecost-8c
    Pentecost-9a
    Pentecost-9b
    Pentecost-9c
    Pentecost-b
    Pentecost-c
    Pentecost Sunday
    Peterson2010
    Peterson-2010
    Philemon
    Philippians
    Philosophy
    Pieper1924
    Pieper-1924
    Piper 1947
    Preaching
    Proper-19c
    Proper-20c
    Proper 21C
    Proper 22C
    Proper 23C
    Proper 24C
    Proper 25C
    Proper 26C
    Proper 27C
    Proper 28C
    Prophets
    Proverbs
    Psalm
    Quinquagesima
    Quintilian
    Receptivity
    Reformation
    Revelation
    Rhetoric
    Romans
    Rordorf 1996
    Rosenberg 1986
    Rosenberg 1987
    Rosenfeld-levene-2012
    Rueger-2016
    Russo 1994
    Ruth
    Sailhamer1992
    Sailhamer-1992
    Sale 1996
    Samuel
    Scaer2004
    Scaer-2004
    Schaff 1888
    Schaff 2014
    Schaff-2014
    Schollgen
    Seeliger 1996
    Septuagesima
    Sermon
    Sexagesima
    Smith-2009
    Sommerville-2006
    Songofsongs
    St. Andrew
    Stark 1997
    St. John
    St. Stephen
    St. Thomas
    Sunday Of The Passion
    Taylor 1888
    Teaching
    Telfer 1939
    Thielman-2010
    Titus
    Transfiguration
    Transfiguration-a
    Transfigurationb
    Transfiguration-c
    Trinity 1
    Trinity 10
    Trinity 11
    Trinity 12
    Trinity 13
    Trinity 14
    Trinity 15
    Trinity 16
    Trinity 17
    Trinity 18
    Trinity 19
    Trinity 2
    Trinity 20
    Trinity 21
    Trinity 22
    Trinity 23
    Trinity 3
    Trinity 4
    Trinity 5
    Trinity 6
    Trinity 7
    Trinity 8
    Trinity 9
    Trinity-a
    Trinity-b
    Trinity-c
    Trinity Sunday
    Tuckett
    Ty 19
    Van-de-sandt-2010
    Van-de-sandt-2011
    Veith1993
    Veith-1993
    Veith-sutton-2017
    Vikis-Freibergs 1997
    Voobus 1969
    Warfield 1886
    Wasson & Toelken 1998
    Weston-2009
    Wilson2011
    Wilson-2011
    Wilson20113470b5cf10
    Ysebaert-2002
    Zechariah
    Zephaniah

Proudly powered by Weebly