Wittenberg Door Campus Ministry
  • Home
  • Calendar
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Recording Archives
  • Resources
    • Bible Study - Matthew's Gospel
    • Bible Study - John's Gospel
    • Bible Study - Ephesians
    • Greek Tutorials
  • About
    • About Wittenberg CoMo
    • Support Us
    • Contact Us
  • Position Papers
  • Sandbox

Biblical Arguments for Age of Baptism

11/19/2024

0 Comments

 
Tuesday Scholarly Notes
11/19/24

Aland, Kurt. (1961). "Chapter Seven: Paul and the Primitive Church" In Did the Early Church Baptize Infants? (Translated by G. R. Beasley-Murray). (pages 780-86). Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock. (Personal Library)

    In this chapter, Aland particularly turns his attention to 1 Corinthians 7 and Paul's suggestion about the holiness of children (Aland 1961, p. 81). The passage makes no statement about baptism of children, let alone of infants. Jeremias takes the passage as an argument of Jewish ritual rather than of Pauline thought. In the passage, the presence of a Christian sanctified the family. Aland notes this concept cannot be identified as any sort of element in Judaism of the time (Aland 1961, p. 82).
    A relevant factor in the argument must be Paul's commitment to the Law. While Paul taught forcefully against trusting in the Mosaic Law, he also asserted the Law as good, paying for a Nazirite vow for four Christians. In Galatians 2 table fellowship seemed expected (Aland 1961, p. 82). These actions suggest to Aland that Paul would not have discouraged circumcision of Jewish children. This could lead to an assumption that Paul would endorse baptism as baptism as an analogous act for infant children of Christians. However, Aland finds no persuasive documentation that circumcision and baptism were found together, or that a culture of circumcision was present in Gentile Christian communities (Aland 1961, p. 83).
    Aland summarizes Jeremias' view of Colossians 2:11 in brief. Jeremias takes it as an unambiguous teaching that baptism serves as the new circumcision (Aland 1961, p. 84). This suggests to Jeremias that 1 Corinthians 7:14 refers to application of baptism to babies. However, Aland does not find Colossians 2:11 to necessarily indicate application to anyone other than adult converts.
    Acts 2:38 is also used to suggest baptism is applied without regard to age (Aland 1961, pp. 84-85). However, Aland understands the original context to have referred specifically to coming generations, indicating baptism at the time of birth. There is a variant reading, with the generations being "of us" or "of you." However, Aland does not consider the variant to suggest a present practice of automatically baptizing babies of Christians (Aland 1961, p. 85). he references to "those who are far" suggests to Aland not a need to baptize infants but a promise that salvation is available to all generations (Aland 1961, p. 86).

​
0 Comments

Inscriptions Show Little Evidence about the Age at which Baptism Was Administered

11/12/2024

0 Comments

 
Tuesday Scholarly Notes
11/12/24

Aland, Kurt. (1961). "Chapter Six: The Evidence of Christian Inscriptions." In Did the Early Church Baptize Infants? (Translated by G. R. Beasley-Murray). (pages 75-79). Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock. (Personal Library)

    Aland contends that while Jeremias cites inscriptions as a source of information for infant baptism, they do not date prior to the third century, at which time we know infant baptism was attested (Aland 1961, p. 75). Even the inscriptions cited by Jeremias are not completely clear about the age at which people were baptized. Aland suggests that Jeremias' point of view considers infant baptism "obligatory for children of Christian parents in the third century, as in the second" (Aland 1961, p. 77). Aland provides the texts of a number of tomb inscriptions. He questions whether, as Jeremias contends, the children of pagans had been baptized in emergencies by Christians. However, a review of the actual wording of the inscriptions does not bear this view out (Aland 1961, p. 78).

​
0 Comments

Conclusive Evidence for Baptismal Ages - not easy to come by

11/5/2024

0 Comments

 
Tuesday Scholarly Notes
11/5/24

Aland, Kurt. (1961). "Chapter Five: Indirect Testimonies to Infant Baptism in the Second Century?" In Did the Early Church Baptize Infants? (Translated by G. R. Beasley-Murray). (pages 70-74). Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock. (Personal Library)

    Aland reiterates that conclusive evidence for infant baptism is not available prior to the third century (Aland 1961, p. 70). However, he concedes that we lack complete information about practices. It is likely that numerous practices existed without any specific record. Jeremias provides numerous indications which may suggest a practice of infant baptism. For instance, Polycarp and others testify to apparently having served Christ for their entire lives. Yet Aland observes that aged Christians in 1 Clement, written about 96 A.D., were in a place with a church founded between 40 and 50 A.D., therefore being Christians since a young age would probably not indicate infancy (Aland 1961, p. 71). Others, in the Acts of the Martyrs, testify to having been born into Christian families. However, this does not indicate that they were baptized as infants (Aland 1961, p. 72). At issue in Aland's analysis is the distinction between being raised as a Christian and being baptized specifically as an infant (Aland 1961, p. 73). 

​
0 Comments

Tertullian and Baptism

10/29/2024

0 Comments

 
Tuesday Scholarly Notes
10/29/24

Aland, Kurt. (1961). "Chapter Four: Tertullian." Did the Early Church Baptize Infants? (Translated by G. R. Beasley-Murray). (pages 61-69). Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock. (Personal Library)

    Aland dates Tertullian from about 160 ultil after 220, placing him as a transitional figure from the second to third centuries (Aland 1961, p. 61). Tertullian's work, De Baptismo, describes his opposition to baptizing infants and small children. This implies a setting in which people would baptize the very young, and lays out an argument that baptismal candidates should come when they are older and understand more.
    While Jeremias takes Tertullian to be speaking of children who convert to Christianity, Aland considers his remarks to refer also to the children of converts (Aland 1961, p. 62-63). The dating of Tertullian's comments regarding baptism is a challenge. Tertullian's views may have changed during his adult life (Aland 1961, p. 63). Yet we are not entirely certain of the dates of his written works. Aland does think Tertullian held baptism of adult or fairly mature converts as his basic standard. They confess the faith themselves and act in ways that indicate their own volition rather than that of parents (Aland 1961, p. 64). Aland nots that Jeremias assumes that Tertullian, in De Anima chapters 39-40 assumes and endorses infant baptism. However, Aland does not take this to be the case. Rather, Aland considers the passage of Tertullian to refer to pagan practices with their children (Aland 1961, p. 65). Aland spends considerable effort on exegesis of the concept in Tertullian.
    In the end, Aland considers that Jeremias has misidentified the subject of Tertullian's argument (Aland 1961, p. 67). Tertullian's argument is that repentance should not be delayed, and that baptism follows repentance. Jeremias, on the other hand, concludes Tertullian's point to be that baptism should not be delayed (Aland 1961, p. 68).

​
0 Comments

Patristic Testimony to Baptism of Children

10/22/2024

0 Comments

 
Tuesday Scholarly Notes
10/22/24

Aland, Kurt. (1961). "Chapter Three: Patristic Statements concerning Infant Baptism from the Beginning to the End of the Second Century." Did the Early Church Baptize Infants? (Translated by G. R. Beasley-Murray). (pages 53-60). Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock. (Personal Library)

    Aland previously reviewed testimony about baptism from the third century. In this chapter, he moves back to the second century, looking for the customs which would lead to the third century practice. To evaluate the context, he points out the presence of "the Apostolic Fathers, then the Apologists who overlap them in time, the Irenaeus, and finally Clement of Alexandria, with whom we come almost exactly to the year 200" (Aland 1961, p. 53). Tertullian is to be discussed later, as a bridge into the third century.
    The baptismal instruction described in the Didache is clearly not oriented toward infants or very small children (Aland 1961, p. 53). The Shepherd of Hermas ahd the Letter of Barnabas both presuppose a period of liveinvolving sins which are washed away. Aland takes this to be not applicable to infants (Aland 1961, p. 54).
    Aland moves on to the apologists of the second century, beginning with Justin (Aland 1961, p. 54). His First Aplogy, chapter 61, describes baptism in such a way as to preclude infants. Those to be baptized are to be persuaded of Christianity and working to live a Christian life. The features of the baptismal ritual suggest people who are more mature than infants, though possibly fairly young children (Aland 1961, p. 55).
    Aristides' Apology is considered by Jeremias, with regard to an allusion to baptism found in 15.11 (Aland 1961, p. 55). Apology 17:4 makes an allusion to baptism of a former pagan, who thanks God that his former sins were committed in ignorance. Further references to giving thanks to God suggest to Jeremias a thankfulness that a child died before being held accountable for sin. Aland takes the case to be a signal that baptism had been applied and effectually washed the hcild from sin (Aland 1961, p. 56). Aland notes that Jeremias omits a discussion of Apology 15:6, which speaks of the baptism of children or servants within a Christian household (Aland 1961, p. 57). Though infants are not included, those who have some insight are baptized and accepted as would be any other Christian.
    Irenaeus is claimed by Jeremias as a witness for infant baptism. However, Aland considers Jeremias' study of Against Heresies II.22.4 to have ended prematurely (Aland 1961, p. 58). Lacking context, Irenaeus does seem to refer to baptism of infants. However, in Aland's view, the passage is intended to describe Jesus as living in the different ages of a normal human, thus purchasing salvation for humans at all stages of life (Aland 1961, p. 58).
    Aland notes that Jeremias takes Clement of Alexandria to speak of children drawn from the water as a sign of children in the faith. Aland takes Clement to have no clarity on the matter of children, suggesting either that it doesn't matter to Clement or that it was not an issue at Clement's time (Aland 1961, p. 59). Aland concludes that infants are not discussed as being baptized, though they are discussed as partakers of God's kingdom (Aland 1961, p. 60).

​
0 Comments

Baptism for Children born to Christians vs. Children of New Converts

10/15/2024

0 Comments

 
Tuesday Scholarly Notes
10/15/24

Aland, Kurt. (1961). "Chapter Two: The First clear Testimonies for the Practice of Infant Baptism in the Third Century." Did the Early Church Baptize Infants? (Translated by G. R. Beasley-Murray). (pages 42-52). Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock. (Personal Library)

    Aland observes the distinction between baptism of children in a household which converts to Christianity and baptism of children born to those who are already Christians. In Aland's view this is an important distinction (Aland 1961, p. 42). As time went on, he expects the amount of catechetical instruction to have increased. Aland's survey of the Didache reveals no clear timeline for pre-baptismal instruction, though chapters 1-6 provide some detail of the content (Aland 1961, p. 43). Chapter 12 discusses reception of guests in good faith, but also indicates some sort of evaluation when a visitor remains in the community. By the time of Justin's Apologia (I.61) there is an expectation of a probationary period prior to baptism. By the early 3rd century Hippolytus' Church Order (42.1), the probationary period was three years. For this reason Aland takes entry into the Church to be recognized prior to more extensive catechesis, but full recognition to be delayed until after catechesis and baptism (Aland 1961, p. 44). If this is the case with children of Christians, everyone is treated the same. Aland interprets Jeremias as taking this point of view.
    By taking the point of view of Jeremias, that essentially all baptisms were "missionary baptisms," Aland considers there to be inadequate evidence of actual practice (Aland 1961, p. 45). Jeremias takes Easter to be the normal date of baptism except in the case of a need for baptism on a deathbed. The practice thus becomes more confused. Aland further notes that the real debate involves not all children, but specifically infants, as those who cannot purposely receive systematic catechesis (Aland 1961, p. 47).
    Origen's testimony, from Palestine between 231 and 250, suggests a prevailing belief that since infants have not sinned, they do not need baptism. Origen's argument is that even newborns bear the guilt of sin, therefore they need baptism. Aland considers that Origen would not have argued in the way he did if the consistent view from the time of the apostles had been in favor of baptizing infants (Aland 1961, p. 47). Yet Aland also finds Jeremias' view that Origen clearly assumed infant baptism as the norm not to flow by necessity from Origen's argument (Aland 1961, p. 48). The strength of the opposition in Origen's arguments calls for questioning the universal acceptance of infant baptism in Palestine at his time.
    Aland notes some specificity in the so-called Church Order  of Hippolytus. Children are to be baptized. Those who cannot speak for themselves should be spoken for by a family member (Aland 1961, p. 49). However, Aland is not certain this church order actually dates to the early third century, and the Greek text is largely lost. Jeremias takes the work to come from Hippolytus and to hearken back to practice of earlier generations. Aland finds this view not necessarily warranted. Aland observes that "a Church Order has the intention of finally establishing the church situation of its time, or the perceptions and demands of its author, by means of an appeal (which is always made) back to the Apostolic age, and thus of securing for itself an anchorage for all the time - until a new Church Order comes along and sets the old one aside and tries to establish something which befits the new time" (Aland 1961, p. 50, emphasis Aland's). The nature of a Church Order is to issue future guidance. This new guidance regularly makes a claim to ancient authority (Aland 1961, p. 51). Aland finds it unclear that the Church Order of Hippolytus refers plainly to the "missionary baptism" model articulated by Jeremias. Children are the first to be baptized in this model. The adults answer for the children. This does not necessarily make sense in the context of parents answering on behalf of their children, when the parents have not yet been baptized (Aland 1961, pp. 51-52). Aland concludes that the children referenced are those of parents who are already Christians.

0 Comments

Weighing the Debate on Infant Baptism

10/8/2024

0 Comments

 
Tuesday Scholarly Notes
10/8/24

Aland, Kurt. (1961). "Chapter One: Changes." Did the Early Church Baptize Infants? (Translated by G. R. Beasley-Murray). (pages 29-41). Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock. (Personal Library)

Aland begins his work with a review of the thought of the generation before his as to the practice of infant baptism. He takes Harnack's summary as a helpful starting point, when he referenced infant baptism as verifiable after the end of the second century but not verifiable earlier (Aland 1961, p. 29). Other scholars with less liberal views likewise say that there is no clear evidence for a usual custom of infant baptism at an early date. In 1931, Ethelbert Stauffer conceded that there is no mention of infant baptism in the New Testament (Aland 1961, p. 30). Aland then references "the work of Joachim Jeremians, Infant Baptism in the first Four Centuries, published in German in 1958 and in English in 1960" (Aland 1961, p. 30. The 1960 edition of Jeremias was published by SCM Press). The preface of this volume indicates that it self-consciously serves as a counter-argument to Jeremias' work. Aland will work with Jeremias' arguments, particularly drawing on the English edition, as it is of a more recent date.
    Aland reports that Jeremias "makes a point of distinction between 'the baptism of children joining the Church' and 'the baptism of children born to Christian parents'" (Aland 1961, p. 31, cf. the first and second chapter titles in Jeremias 1960). Because of the missionary nature of the first century Church, adult converts are at the center of the picture. However, as families would convert to Christianity the accounts are made in terms of households. When these families included children, it is natural to assume the children were baptized along with the parents. It would be expected that if some were omitted, there would be some mention of the fact. Aland walks through Jeremias' argument of this point in detail, with specific references to the location of the different elements of the argument in Jeremias.
    A persuasive element of Jeremias' argument as described by Aland is that of Jewish baptism of proselytes. Children who were already born at the time of the family's conversion were circumcised (male) or baptized (female). If children were born after the family, they were treated exactly as other Israelites (Aland 1961, p. 32-33). It is reasonable to assume a similar pattern for Christian family conversions.
    If baptism is a Christian version of circumcision (Colossians 2:11), and Christians rejected circumcision, it is valid to ask whether baptism was applied to children or not (Aland 1961, p. 33). Jeremiahs, in his 1958 edition, finds a change of baptismal practice in the mid fifties (Aland 1961, p. 33-34). Before this time, the consensus was to not baptize children.
    Jeremias' 1960 edition did not identify baptism, but rather the descent of children from a Christian parent was taken to place people into the protection of God.
    Jeremias takes there to be an abrupt change in A.D. 55. Before that time he finds less evidence for infant baptism, but after then there is a greater bulk of information about the makeup of families who convert to Christianity.
    From the middle of the first century to the end of the third century, there is considerably more evidence for baptism, though not in all regions (Aland 1961, p. 37). Origen's report, which may be influenced by the testimony of his grandfather and father, suggests a habit of baptizing infants at an early time in the Christian period (Aland 1961, p. 38). The second century testimony of Tertullian is more difficult, as it makes arguments for cases in which a delay of baptism would be appropriate (Aland 1961, p. 40).

​
0 Comments

Instruction and Baptism in Matthew, James, and the Didache

8/29/2023

0 Comments

 
8/29/23
Scholarly Reflections
Stewart-Sykes, Alistair. "Chapter Fifteen: Ἀποκύησις λόγῳ ἀληθείας: Paraenesis and Baptism in Matthew, James, and the Didache." in Van de Sandt, Huub & Zangenberg, Jürgen K. (editors). Matthew, James, and Didache: Three Related Documents in their Jewish and Christian Settings." Atlanta, GA: Society of Biblical Literature, 2008, 341-359.

Stewart-Sykes considers the paraenetic content of Matthew, James, and the Didache as regards baptism (Stewart-Sykes 2008, 341). He is particularly interested in the specific pre-baptismal instruction specified in the Didache. Following Pseudo-Isocrates (Ad Demonicum), Stewart-Sykes suggests a distinction between paraenesis, or ethical advice, and exhortation (Stewart-Sykes 2008, 342). There is certainly an element of exhortation, but the primary goal is giving advice. Stewart-Sykes goes on to cite a variety of scholarly opinions further identifying what would be meant by paraenesis (Stewart-Sykes 2008, 343-345).

The Two Ways material in the Didache, taken in context, is ethical instruction intended to prepare one for baptism (Stewart-Sykes 2008, 345). Matthew 5-7 is another example of paraenesis. Stewart- Sykes considers that, in light of the command to baptize and teach, from Matthew 28, that the instruction in chapters 5-7 should be viewed in light of pre-baptismal instruction (Stewart-Sykes 2008, 345-346). James, as a whole, can readily be understood as paraenetic in nature (Stewart-Sykes 2008, 346). It is marked by extensive ethical content. The context, however, is not that of prebaptismal instruction.

Stewart-Sykes begins an analysis of the meaning of baptism with James, who views baptism as the point of rebirth, a gift of God (Stewart-Sykes 2008, 348). This is accompanied by a "word of truth," which would likely be either words spoken at the baptism or as teaching beforehand. Matthew's Gospel ties baptism to an eschatological hope. The baptized person has an immediate hope in Christ as well as a hope at the end of the world (Stewart-Sykes 2008, 349).

Stewart-Sykes discusses the understanding of baptism as either in the name of the Trinity (Matthew and Didache) or in the name of Jesus (James) (Stewart-Sykes 2008, 350ff). By the early third century we have more extensive baptismal rites, though without a specific formula spoken. There are some assumptions that a development in thought occurred, resulting in a clear Trinitarian confession and act, but this is nowhere clearly stated in antiquity (Stewart-Sykes 2008, 351).

Stewart-Sykes returns to the question of pre-baptismal instruction in James. The concept is not stated clearly in James, but there may be allusions to it (Stewart-Sykes 2008, 353). He finds this to be the case in James 1:19-21, where there is exhortation, apparently repeated for those who have already been taught, to pursue life consistent with that in Matthew 5:21-23 and in the Didache's Way of Life (Stewart-Sykes 2008, 354). Stewart-Sykes goes on to identify a number of instances where James calls readers to a life consistent with the Didache's Way of Life.

In conclusion, Stewart-Sykes finds the three documents all speak to the reality of pre-baptismal instruction, and that those instructions guide the candidate for baptism into a particular mode of life which also includes an eschatological hope (Stewart-Sykes 2008, 356-357).

​
0 Comments

Baptismal Anointing Prayer

1/20/2023

0 Comments

 
1/20/23
Scholarly Reflections

Voöbus, Arthur. "Part 1: On the Rite of Baptism." "Chapter Four: Prehistory of the Ointment Prayer." Liturgical Traditions in the Didache. Stockholm: ETSE, 1968, 51-60.

In this chapter Voöbus asks whether it is possible to trace an older form of the ointment prayer in the Coptic fragment of the Didache. E. Peterson proposed a reconstruction, strongly influenced by the Apostolic Constitutions. Voöbus considers the dependence  proposed by Peterson to be too great Voöbus51). The Coptic papyrus itself is deserving of consideration. Voöbus thinks the recension of the Apostolic Constitutions represents an explication of the Coptic prayer (Voöbus 1968, 52). Yet this does not necessarily confirm that the Coptic version is the original. Nor does it confirm that the prayer was originally part of the Didache.

If the ointment prayer is an original part of the Didache, Voöbus considers how it would fit in (Voöbus 1968, 54). The form is very like a eucharistic prayer. Omission itself seems surprising. Some have suggested it was antiquated and no longer served a liturgical purpose. This could result in its suppression (Voöbus 1968, 55). Yet it would have made more sense for a redactor to simply edit the prayer to be in harmony with current practice.

Voöbus notesthat the prayer is introduced with, "thus as we say" (Voöbus 1968, 56). This suggests the prayer, already in existence, was inserted here. The wording of the prayer is relatively awkward. Yet in its words it clearly states the availability of a number of sacramental gifts. These gifts are given to the people of early Christianity as something precious (Voöbus 1968, 57). The prayer is located in a group of topically related prayers identified as eucharistia (Voöbus 1968, 58). This, to Voöbus, does not seem entirely consistent with the pattern of the rest of the Didache. He considers it may not have been original, or that it could have been moved for some reason in the editorial process. This process is largely invisible to us. However, Voöbus considers the various statements about baptism, from chapter seven, to be evidence of layers of editorial work (Voöbus 1968, 59). In Voöbus' view, as the rituals grew and changed, statements which acknowledged those practices were added. He sees this as following different patterns in different locations (Voöbus 1968, 60). 

​
0 Comments

Prayer for Baptismal Anointing

1/19/2023

0 Comments

 
1/19/23
Scholarly Reflections

Voöbus, Arthur. "Part 1: On the Rite of Baptism." "Chapter Three: The Ointment Prayer." Liturgical Traditions in the Didache. Stockholm: ETSE, 1968, 41-50.

Voöbus observes that, in conjunction with the baptismal ritual, an anointing with oil appears in the Apostolic Constitutions (Voöbus 1968, 41). This is also reflected in a Coptic papyrus fragment of the Didache, where a prayer for anointing appears appended to chapters 9-10. In both instances the prayer is associated with allowing prophets to pray as they wish.

The prayer is associated with an aromatic ointment or a perfume (Voöbus 1968, 42). The interpretation is not clear, according to Voöbus, expect that the text of the Apostolic Constitutions identifies it as a prayer associated with the aroma. The question of what specific use of ointment is meant is more difficult (Voöbus 1968, 43). Voöbus discusses the common use of anointing and praying for the sick. This would not intuitively be connected with the Eucharist, where the passage appears. However, ointment was also associated with baptism. Voöbus finds such an association in Jewish baptismal practice, as well as in Jewish ceremonial meal practices (Voöbus 1968, 44). Unfortunately, this fails to create clarity in the view.

A search for the function of the anointing is not immediately rewarding. Voöbus finds that the Apostolic Constitutions makes mention of "the immortal eon" (Voöbus 1968, 45). This does suggest the dichotomy between the present, fallen age and that of immortality. From this foundation, Voöbus is able to move to the concept of baptism, where one moves from the former to the latter (Voöbus 1968, 46). When asking about a reason for the choice of a word related to fragrance, Voöbus finds more associations. A Syriac version of Acts describes a fragrance along with the coming of the Holy Spirit at Pentecost (Voöbus 1968, 46). Paradise is regularly described in terms of aromatic plants. Voöbus thus finds good smells as related to moving into the heavenly realms as one does in baptism (Voöbus 1968, 47). Fragrance therefore can be well seen as a concomitant with baptism. Voöbus notes that the ointment prayer was grouped with various prayers of thanksgiving, the meaning of εὐχαριστία (Voöbus 1968, 49). When used in later documents, "oil of the eucharistia" is descriptive of anointing at baptism. 

​
0 Comments

Baptismal Ritual

1/18/2023

0 Comments

 
1/18/23
Scholarly Reflections

Voöbus, Arthur. "Part 1: On the Rite of Baptism." "Chapter Two: Prehistory of the Tradition." Liturgical Traditions in the Didache. Stockholm: ETSE, 1968, 29-39.

Voöbus opens this chapter with the question of a Jewish origin for Didache chapter seven. He calls in the view of E. Peterson, who "contends that the discussion on various kinds of water has nothing to do with baptism at all but with the washings for purification" (Voöbus 1968, 29). It is possible that the formulaic patterns for ceremonial washings could be borrowed from Judaism. The case may further be made for a relationship to Jewish baptism of proselytes (Voöbus 1968, 30). On the other hand, Voöbus does suggest that making the compiler of the Didache dependent on sources for all his specific wording is an insult to his abilities as an author.

Peterson had further suggested that Didache chapter seven was a revision instilling a particular dogmatic change, by which an anointing with oil was removed from the chapter (Voöbus 1968, 31). Voöbus observes that Peterson considered the concession of baptism by affusion to be introduced in an illogical way. In comparison with the Apostolic Constitutions, we see the Constitutions speaking of two different ointments. This is in contrast to the Didache's use of two types of water for baptism. Yet Voöbus does not consider it necessary to make a claim that Apostolic Constitutions contains everything that the Didache once held (Voöbus 1968, 32). The simple fact is that we don't have adequate information to make such a claim.

Because redaction history is arelatively controversial topic, Voöbus proposes further study, but in the realm of comparative analysis of the process in similar documents for which some of the redactional details can be identified (Voöbus 1968, 33). This would allow scholars to evaluate existing texts without calling them into undue question. In particular, Voöbus considers it unlikely that additions or omissions would be carried on in a haphazard manner. Redactors should be assumed to be competent and thoughtful.

Even as we question the type of redaction which may have taken place, it is necessary to recognize that the very nature of a liturgical manual suggests redaction. Voöbus does not in any way suggest the materials were invented for use in the Didache (Voöbus 1968, 34). The problem he sees is application of adequate tools to identify various layers. The concession of baptism by affusion may or may no tbe a later interpolation.

The Trinitarian formula of baptism may shed light on the redaction history. Voöbus note that outside of Matthew's Gospel, the New Testament does not reflect a specific instance of the Trinitarian formula in use for baptism (Voöbus 1968, 35). Evidence of the Didache's dependence on Matthew for the formula is inconclusive. Voöbus would prefer to view the record in the Didache as influenced by actual ritual practice rather than Scriptural statements (Voöbus 1968, 36). Underlying the formulaic wording Voöbus finds an alternate wording which is well represented in Scripture. Didache 9.5 identifies people as "baptized into the name of the Lord" (Voöbus 1968, 38). Voöbus recognizes that the statement of 9.5 is likely older and is certainly simpler. It describes the exact same action. Further, it appears in Paul and in Acts. The Lord is identified clearly with Jesus, and, provided the understanding of a Trinity is present, the natural conclusion one would make is that the referent is identical (Voöbus 1968, 39). This fits with our understanding of the liturgucal practice and the theology it represents. An addition of a Trinitarian statement would represent a clarification, not a theological change.

​
0 Comments

Baptismal Tradition and the Didache

1/17/2023

0 Comments

 
1/17/23
Scholarly Reflections

Voöbus, Arthur. "Part 1: On the Rite of Baptism." "Chapter One: Tradition Regarding Baptism." Liturgical Traditions in the Didache. Stockholm: ETSE, 1968, 17-27.

Voöbus notes that the Didache's chapter pertaining to baptism (chapter seven) is relatively short, and, further, it gives relatively little indication of the nature of catechesis preparatory for baptism (Voöbus 1968, 17).  While there is a statement about speaking the materials from chapters 1-6, it is unclear whether that is a part of the baptismal ceremony or an outline for prior catechesis. Voöbus takes the command as an indication of catechetical instruction (Voöbus 1968, 18). This would be consistent with what we know from other sources about catechesis in Jewish proselyte baptism or Jewish Christianity. Of note to Voöbus is that the material content of the catechesis is moral in nature, not dealing with Christ and the atonement or other highly theological elements (Voöbus 1968, 19).

The purpose of a fast prior to baptism is not made clear, but the duration of one or two days is, as well as the call for as many involved in the baptism as can participate in the fast. This is more clear guidance than is found in other sources(Voöbus 1968, 20-21).

In the baptism itself, the candidate is baptized "into the name" of the Lord. Voöbus sees this as indicating a transfer into the service of the Lord (Voöbus 1968, 21). If possible, the baptism is to use "living water." Voöbus interprets this as being either water from a stream or from a well (Voöbus 1968, 22). If living water is not available, it is possible to use other water, whether cold or warm. Voöbus notes that some scholarship suggests it is warmed for children or the sick (Voöbus 1968, 23). However, he finds a prevailing pattern within Judaism to refer to water which has lost its original temperature as "warm." This would apply to water in a reservoir or a cistern (Voöbus 1968, 24). A mode of baptism, such as immersion, is not specified. However, if no adequate supply of water is present, water may be poured over the head three times (Voöbus 1968, 26).

Voöbus observes that we are not told who would perform a baptism, or whether there was a consecration of the water (Voöbus 1968, 26). We are also not told what to expect as far as the meaning of baptism. Though it is a prerequisite for communion, we are not given any additional expectations (Voöbus 1968, 27). 

​
0 Comments

Baptism as Entry into God's Kingdom

10/18/2021

0 Comments

 
10/18/21
Scholarly Reflections

Daniélou, Jean, S.J. "Chapter Two: The Baptismal Rite." The Bible and the Liturgy." Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1956, pp. 35-53.

Daniélou observe that the catechetical preparation, though very important, is done for those who are still outside the Church. It is not until the baptism itself that the person actually enters the church body (Daniélou 1956, 35). Cyril of Jerusalem described it as an entrance from the vestibule into the king's palace (Procatechesis XXXIII, 333A). Daniélou notes that we have at least one third century baptistry which features artistic depictions of the Fall on one side and Christ welcoming his people on the other side (Daniélou 1956, 36). The shape was often an octagon, with the number eight serving as a symbol of the resurrection (Daniélou 1956, 37).

The candidate, led into the baptistry, is stripped of his clothing, symbolic of taking off the old man (Daniélou 1956, 37). It may also serve as a symbolic identification with Christ, who was stripped before being crucified. Both symbols are used by Cyril (Daniélou 1956, 38). Gregory of Nyssa compares the stripping to the covering given to Adam, garments of skin, which required death. Again, it is a return to the nakedness of creation (Daniélou 1956, 39). Theodore of Mopsuestia further compares it to a removal of the fig leaves which Adam and Eve used to cover themselves.

Following the removal of the clothes, there is anointing with oil, symbolic of the richness of God and the power of Christ's purity (Daniélou 1956, 40). It is also considered a sign of God's healing and strengthening power. The metaphor of struggle and battle is carried out through the Easter vigil, as it has been in progress throughout Lent (Daniélou 1956, 41).

In some places, the water used for the baptism itself would be blessed, indicating that water by itself would not cleanse from sin (Daniélou 1956, 42). The old man would enter the water and the new man would emerge. Again, Cyril finds a parallel to Christ, this time in his death and resurrection (Daniélou 1956, 43). The theme of death, burial, and resurrection is very common in early Christian understanding of baptism. Daniélou discusses and illustrates this at some length.

An additional piece of symbolism in baptism is that of birth. Daniélou notes that this theme, of the Church as mother giving birth to children, was most likely developed in African thought (Daniélou 1956, 47-48).

After the baptism, the believer is clothed with a pure white garment (Daniélou 1956, 49). This symbolizes the new, the pure, and God's grace. Again we see echoes of Adam's purity having been stripped away and then his being clothed by God's hand. The clothing is seen as a robe of glory, provided by God (Daniélou 1956, 51).

​
0 Comments

    ​Help Fuel This Ministry by Clicking Here!

    All the work of Wittenberg Door Campus Ministry, including this blog, is supported by the generosity of people like you. Please consider joining our team of prayer and financial supporters. Read more here!
    Please Note: The opinions presented in blog posts are not necessarily those of Wittenberg Door Campus Ministry. Frequently we report on contrary views, often without comment. Please chime in on the discussion.

    About Throwing Inkwells

    When Martin Luther was dealing with struggles in his life he once saw what appeared to be an angelic being. Not trusting that he was going to be informed by someone other than the God revealed in Scripture, he took the appearance to be untrustworthy and hurled his inkwell at it. The chipped place in the plaster wall is still visible at the Wartburg Castle, though apparently the ink stain on the wall has been refreshed periodically by the caretaker.

    Blog Feeds

    RSS Feed

    Want to keep up with what's happening at Wittenberg Door? Subscribe to our mailing list!

    Categories

    All
    1 Chronicles
    1 Corinthians
    1 John
    1 Kings
    1 Peter
    1 Samuel
    1 Thessalonians
    1 Timothy
    2019-02-feb
    2 Chronicles
    2 Corinthians
    2-john
    2 Kings
    2 Peter
    2 Samuel
    2 Thessalonians
    2 Timothy
    3-john
    Abortion
    Academic-success
    Acts
    Advent 1
    Advent-1-a
    Advent-1b
    Advent-1c
    Advent 2
    Advent-2-a
    Advent-2b
    Advent-2c
    Advent 3
    Advent-3-a
    Advent-3b
    Advent-3c
    Advent 4
    Advent-4-a
    Advent-4b
    Advent-4c
    Akagi 2016
    Aland 1961
    Alesso-2009
    Alexander 1999
    Allegory
    Allitt-2010
    All Saints' Day
    Alon 1996
    Amos
    Anaphora
    Anointing
    Antioch
    Anunciation
    Apollinaris Of Hierapolis
    Apologetics
    Apostles' Creed
    Apostolical Constitutions
    Apostolic Fathers
    Applied Theology
    Aristides Of Athens
    Aristotle
    Aryeh 2021
    Ascension Day
    Ash Wednesday
    Athenagoras Of Athens
    Audet 1996
    Augustine
    Bakker-1993
    Balabanski-1997
    Bammel-1996
    Baptism
    Baptism-of-christ
    Baptism-of-the-lord-b
    Bardy-1938
    Baron-2019
    Baron-maponya-2020
    Bauckham-1984
    Bauckham-2006
    Bauckham-2007
    Beale-1984
    Belief
    Belonging
    Benamos-1999
    Betz-1996
    Biesenthal-1893
    Bigg-1904
    Bigg-1905
    Blogcation
    Blomberg-1984
    Boehme2010
    Botha-1967
    Botha-1993
    Botha-2013
    Braaten-2007
    Bradshaw 2002
    Bruce-1988
    Bruce-1988
    Bryennios
    Butler-1960
    Caneday-2017
    Canonicity
    Capon-1998
    Capon1998
    Carr-2010
    Carson-1991
    Carson-moo-2005
    Catechesis
    Catholicism
    Cerfaux-1959
    Chilton-1984
    Chrismation
    Christmas-1b
    Christmas-1c
    Christmas-dawn
    Christmas-day
    Christmas Eve
    Christmas Midnight
    Chronicles
    Church History
    Church Order
    Circumcision And Naming Of Christ
    Cody 1995
    Colossians
    Conditions
    Confession Of Peter
    Confessions
    Connolly 1932
    Connolly 1933
    Connolly 1934
    Constantine
    Constanza-2013
    Cooper & Lioy 2018
    Costa 2021
    Court 1981
    Creeds
    Culley 1986
    Cyprian
    Daly 1978
    Daniel
    Danielou 1956
    Davids 1984
    Davis 1995
    DeHalleux 1996
    Dehandschutter 1995
    Denominations
    Deuteronomy
    Didache
    Diversity
    Divine Fellowship
    Dix 1933
    Dix-2005
    Dix2005
    Doane 1994
    Draper
    Draper 1984
    Draper 1989
    Draper 1995
    Draper-1996
    Draper-1997
    Draper-2000
    Draper 2005
    Draper-2006
    Draper 2008
    Dube 2016
    Due 2003
    Early Christian Functionaries
    Easter-2
    Easter-2a
    Easter2b
    Easter-2c
    Easter-3
    Easter-3a
    Easter-3b
    Easter-3c
    Easter-4
    Easter-4a
    Easter-4b
    Easter-4c
    Easter-5
    Easter-5a
    Easter-5b
    Easter-6
    Easter-6a
    Easter-6b
    Easter-6c
    Easter-7
    Easter-7a
    Easter-7b
    Easter-7c
    Easter-b
    Easter-day
    Easter-monday
    Easter-sunday-a
    Easter-sunday-c
    Easter-sunrise
    Easter-tuesday
    Easter-wednesday
    Ecclesiastes
    Eleutheria2014
    Elman-1999
    Ephesians
    Epiphany
    Epiphany-1c
    Epiphany-2-a
    Epiphany-2c
    Epiphany-3-a
    Epiphany-3b
    Epiphany-3c
    Epiphany-4-a
    Epiphany-4b
    Epiphany-4c
    Epiphany-5-a
    Epiphany-5b
    Epiphany-5c
    Epiphany-6-a
    Epiphany-6c
    Epiphany-7-a
    Epiphany-c
    Epistle Of Barnabas
    Epistles
    Eschatology
    Esther
    Ethics
    Eucharist
    Evangelism
    Eve-of-the-circumcision-of-christ
    Exodus
    Exodus-20
    Experiential Reading
    Eybers 1975
    Ezekiel
    Ezra
    Fagerberg-1988
    Fagerberg1988
    Fall Of Jerusalem
    Farrell-1987
    Flew-2007
    Flusser-1996
    Forde-2007
    Fraade-1999
    France-2007
    Galatians
    Garrow 2004
    Gender
    Genesis
    Gero 1977
    Gibbins 1935
    Gibbs 2006
    Gibbs 2010
    Gibbs 2018
    Glover-1958
    Goga & Popa 2019
    Gonzalez-2010
    Good-friday
    Gospels
    Greek
    Grosvener-schaff-1885
    Grosvenor-1884
    Guardian-of-jesus
    Habakkuk
    Haggai
    Hagner 1984
    Harnack-1884
    Harrington 2008
    Harris 1887
    Harris 1984
    Hartin 2008
    Hasitschka 2008
    Hearon 2004
    Hearon 2010
    Hebrews
    Heilmann 2018
    Henderson-1992
    Henderson1992
    Henderson 1995
    Hezser 2010
    History
    Hoffman-1986
    Holy Cross Day
    Holy-innocents
    Holy-saturday
    Horsley 2010
    Hosea
    Hutchens2013
    Hymes-1994
    Ignatius Of Antioch
    Incarnation
    Infertility
    Isaiah
    Jaffee-1999
    James
    James Of Jerusalem
    James The Elder
    Jefford 1989
    Jefford 1995
    Jefford 2005
    Jefford 2019
    Jeffreys-1986
    Jeremiah
    Jerome
    Jesus
    Jewish Christianity
    Job
    Joel
    John
    Jonah
    Jones & Mirecki 1995
    Joseph
    Joshua
    Judaism
    Jude
    Judges
    Julian The Apostate
    Jungmann-1959
    Justinian
    Justin Martyr
    Kelber-1987
    Kelber-1995
    Kelber 2002
    Kelber 2010
    Kelber & Sanders 2010
    Kelly 1978
    Kevil
    Kings
    Kleinig-2013
    Kloppenborg 1979
    Kloppenborg 1995
    Kloppenborg 2005
    Kloppenborg 2008
    Koch2010
    Kok 2015
    Kolb-2000
    Kolb2000
    Kolb-arand-2008
    Kolbarand2008
    Konradt 2008
    Koukl 2019
    Kurekchomycz2009
    Lake 1905
    Lamentations
    Last-sunday-of-the-church-year
    Last-sunday-of-the-church-year-a
    Last-sunday-of-the-church-year-b
    Last-sunday-of-the-church-year-c
    Last Supper
    LaVerdiere 1996
    Law
    Layton 1968
    Lectionary
    Lent-1
    Lent-1-a
    Lent-1b
    Lent-1c
    Lent-2
    Lent-2-a
    Lent-2b
    Lent-2c
    Lent-3
    Lent-3-a
    Lent-3b
    Lent-3c
    Lent-4
    Lent-4-a
    Lent-4b
    Lent-4c
    Lent-5
    Lent-5-a
    Lent-5b
    Lent-5c
    Lessing-2014
    Lessing2014
    Lessing & Steinmann 2014
    Leviticus
    LGBTQ
    Lincoln-1885
    Lindemann 1997
    Literacy
    Literary Character
    Liturgy
    Livesey 2012
    Long-2009
    Lord-1986
    Lord-1987
    Lord's Prayer
    Love
    Luke
    Luther
    Lutheran Confessions
    Lutheran Distinctives
    Maas-2014
    Maccoull-1999
    Maier-1984
    Malachi
    Manuscripts
    Marcion
    Mark
    Marty-2016
    Martyrdom-of-john-the-baptist
    Martyrs
    Mary-magdalene
    Mary-mother-of-our-lord
    Mason-1998
    Massaux-1993-1950
    Matthew
    Matthias
    Mazza-1995
    Mazza-1996
    Mazza-1999
    Mbamalu-2014
    Mcdonald-1980
    Mcdonnell-montague-1991
    Mckean-2003
    Mcknight-2014
    Micah
    Middleton-1935
    Milavec-1995
    Milavec-2003
    Milavec-2005
    Milavec2012
    Miller-2019
    Missional
    Mitch-2010
    Mitchell-1995
    Molina-evers-1998
    Monasticism
    Monday-in-holy-week
    Montenyohl-1993
    Morris-1992
    Motyer-1993
    Mueller-2006
    Muilenburg-1929
    Music
    Nahum
    Nehemiah
    Neufeld-1999
    Newsletter
    New Testament
    New-testament
    Niditch-1995
    Niditch-2003
    Niebuhr-1956
    Niederwimmer-1982
    Niederwimmer-1995
    Niederwimmer-1996
    Niederwimmer 1998
    Numbers
    Oaths
    Obadiah
    Old Testament
    Old-testament
    Olsen-1986
    Ong-1987
    Ong-1988
    Ong-1995
    Oralit
    Orality
    Ordination
    Orphan-hosting
    Osborne-2002
    Osborne-2013
    Overman-2008
    Ozment-1980
    Ozment1980
    Painter-2008
    Palm-sunday
    Palm-sunday-a
    Palm-sunday-c
    Pardee-1995
    Pardee-2012
    Parks-1986
    Passionb
    Pastoral-office
    Pastors
    Patterson-1995
    Paul
    Pearce-1993
    Pentateuch
    Pentecost-10a
    Pentecost-10b
    Pentecost-10c
    Pentecost-11a
    Pentecost-11b
    Pentecost-11c
    Pentecost-12a
    Pentecost-12b
    Pentecost-12c
    Pentecost-13a
    Pentecost-13b
    Pentecost-13c
    Pentecost13c
    Pentecost-14a
    Pentecost-14b
    Pentecost14c
    Pentecost-15
    Pentecost-15a
    Pentecost-15b
    Pentecost15c
    Pentecost-16
    Pentecost-16a
    Pentecost-16b
    Pentecost-16c
    Pentecost-17a
    Pentecost-17b
    Pentecost-17c
    Pentecost-18a
    Pentecost-18b
    Pentecost-18-c
    Pentecost-19a
    Pentecost-19b
    Pentecost-19-c
    Pentecost-1a
    Pentecost-20a
    Pentecost-20b
    Pentecost-20-c
    Pentecost-21a
    Pentecost-21b
    Pentecost-21-c
    Pentecost-22a
    Pentecost-22b
    Pentecost-22-c
    Pentecost-23a
    Pentecost-23b
    Pentecost-23-c
    Pentecost-24a
    Pentecost-24b
    Pentecost-24-c
    Pentecost-25b
    Pentecost-25-c
    Pentecost-26b
    Pentecost-26-c
    Pentecost-2a
    Pentecost-2b
    Pentecost-2c
    Pentecost-3a
    Pentecost-3b
    Pentecost-3c
    Pentecost-4a
    Pentecost-4b
    Pentecost-4c
    Pentecost-5a
    Pentecost-5b
    Pentecost-5c
    Pentecost-6a
    Pentecost-6b
    Pentecost-6c
    Pentecost-7a
    Pentecost-7b
    Pentecost-7c
    Pentecost-8a
    Pentecost-8b
    Pentecost-8c
    Pentecost-9a
    Pentecost-9b
    Pentecost-9c
    Pentecost-b
    Pentecost-c
    Pentecost-eve
    Pentecost-monday
    Pentecost-sunday
    Pentecost-tuesday
    Petersen-1994
    Peterson-2010
    Peterson2010
    Philemon
    Philippians
    Philosophy
    Picirilli-1988
    Pick-1908
    Pieper-1924
    Pieper1924
    Pieper-1968
    Piper-1947
    Pluralism
    Pope Leo I
    Post-70
    Powell-2000
    Prayer
    Preaching
    Presentation-of-our-lord
    Proctor-2019
    Proper19c
    Proper20c
    Proper-21c
    Proper-22c
    Proper-23c
    Proper-24c
    Proper-25c
    Proper-26c
    Proper-27c
    Proper-28c
    Prophecy
    Prophets
    Proverbs
    Psalm
    Psalms
    Purity
    Quinquagesima
    Quintilian
    Rabbinic-character
    Real-presence
    Receptivity
    Reed-1995
    Reformation
    Reformation-day
    Reinhartz-2018
    Reproof
    Repschinski-2008
    Resurrection
    Revelation
    Rhetoric
    Rhoads-2010
    Richardson-gooch-1984
    Riggs-1995
    Ritual-meal
    Romans
    Romeny-2005
    Rordorf-1996
    Rosenberg-1986
    Rosenberg-1987
    Rosenfeldlevene2012
    Rouwhorst-2005
    Rueger-2016
    Russo-1994
    Ruth
    Sacrament
    Sacrifice
    Saenger-1999
    Sailhamer-1992
    Sailhamer1992
    Sale-1996
    Samuel
    Scaer-2004
    Scaer2004
    Schaff-1886
    Schaff-1888
    Schaff-1889
    Schaff 2014
    Schaff2014
    Schollgen
    Schroter-2008
    Schwarz-2005
    Scriptural-usage
    Seeliger-1996
    Senn-1997
    Septuagesima
    Sermon
    Sexagesima
    Sim-2008
    Simon-and-jude
    Smith-2009
    Smith-2018
    Sommerville-2006
    Song-of-songs
    Songofsongs
    St-andrew
    Stark 1997
    St-barnabas
    St-bartholomew
    Stewart-Sykes 2008
    St-john
    St-john-the-baptist
    St-luke
    St-mark
    St-matthew
    St-matthias
    St-michael-and-all-angels
    St-paul
    St-peter-and-paul
    St Philip And St James
    Strawbridge 2017
    St. Stephen
    St. Thomas
    St. Titus
    Sunday Of The Passion
    Svartvik 2008
    Syreeni 2005
    Syria
    Tatian
    Taylor 1888
    TDNT
    Teaching
    Telfer 1939
    Tertullian
    Textual Comparison
    Textual Integrity
    Theological Development
    Theophilos 2018
    Theophilus Of Antioch
    Thielman 2010
    Thursday-in-holy-week
    Timothy
    Titus
    Tomson-2005
    Tomson-2008
    Tradition
    Transfiguration
    Transfiguration-a
    Transfigurationb
    Transfiguration-c
    Trinity-1
    Trinity-10
    Trinity-11
    Trinity-12
    Trinity-13
    Trinity-14
    Trinity-15
    Trinity-16
    Trinity-17
    Trinity 18
    Trinity 19
    Trinity 2
    Trinity 20
    Trinity 21
    Trinity 22
    Trinity 23
    Trinity 3
    Trinity-4
    Trinity-5
    Trinity-6
    Trinity-7
    Trinity-8
    Trinity-9
    Trinity-a
    Trinity-b
    Trinity-c
    Trinity-sunday
    Tsang-2009
    Tuckett
    Tuesday-in-holy-week
    Tuilier-1995
    Tuilier-2005
    Twelftree-1984
    Two-ways
    Ty-19
    Vahrenhurst-2008
    Van-der-merwe-2017
    Van-der-merwe-2019
    Van-der-watt-2008
    Van-de-sandt-2002
    Van-de-sandt-2007
    Van-de-sandt-2008
    Vandesandt2010
    Vandesandt2011
    Van-de-sandt-flusser-2002
    Van-deventer-2021
    Varner-2005
    Vatican-ii
    Veith-1993
    Veith1993
    Veith-sutton-2017
    Verheyden-2005
    Verheyden-2008
    Vikisfreibergs-1997
    Visitation
    Voobus-1968
    Voobus-1969
    Vows
    Warfield-1886
    Wasson-toelken-1998
    Wednesday-in-holy-week
    Wegman 1985
    Wenham-1984
    Wenham-1992
    Weren-2005
    Weren-2008
    Weston-2009
    Wilhite-2019
    Wilson-2011
    Wilson2011
    Wilson20113470b5cf10
    Winger-2014
    Wischmeyer-2008
    Wolmarans-2005
    Wright-1984
    Young-2011
    Ysebaert2002
    Zangenberg-2008
    Zechariah
    Zephaniah
    Zetterholm-2008

Proudly powered by Weebly