Wittenberg Door Campus Ministry
  • Home
  • Calendar
    • Calendar
    • Events
  • Blog
  • Recording Archives
  • Resources
    • Bible Study - John's Gospel
    • Greek Tutorials
  • About
    • About Wittenberg CoMo
    • Support Us
    • Contact Us
  • Position Papers
  • Sandbox

Too Much Freedom?

3/9/2016

0 Comments

 
Wednesdays are for Bits and Pieces  3/9/16
Forde, Gerhard O. The Preached God: Proclamation in Word and Sacrament. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2007. Kindle Electronic Edition.
Chapter 15, “Called to Freedom” Loc. 3494-3696.

Forde notes that the Reformation’s recognition of freedom was revolutionary in his time and in ours. He says, “Luther is usually charged with ‘heresy’ on two counts: too much bondage on the one hand and too much freedom on the other!” (Loc. 3501). The discussion of freedom shifted at the time of the Reformation to “actual liberation, not as a covert enslavement of the self” (Forde 2007, Loc. 3512). Using an argument of free will to explain sin results in guilt on our part (Forde 2007, Loc. 3517) On the contrary, Forde notes, the freedom of the gospel is freedom from the crushing power of the law (Forde 2007, Loc. 3526).

Forde then notes that the world around us does not think of the inner freedom from the law as adequate or practical (Forde 2007, Loc. 3546). Because we are uncomfortable with this freedom we turn to the law again (Forde 2007, Loc. 3551). Yet Forde reminds us of the very Pauline view that Christ has completed the law, leaving his people free to depend on him (Forde 2007, Loc. 3569). In Luther, the gulf between law and freedom is immense (Forde 2007, Loc. 3584). In the end, “Faith in the promises of God is itself the greatest obedience” (Forde 2007, Loc. 3594). This is the ultimate freedom. The result is a life in which we freely live out what God has created us for (Forde 2007, Loc. 3608). As to the claim that freedom might not work, Forde with Luther says we continue proclaiming freedom (Forde 2007, Loc. 3646). Freedom, after all, is never by compulsion.

0 Comments

Doctrinal Unity

3/2/2016

0 Comments

 
Wednesdays are for Bits and Pieces  3/2/16
Forde, Gerhard O. The Preached God: Proclamation in Word and Sacrament. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2007. Kindle Electronic Edition.
Chapter 14, “Reflections on the Fries-Rahner Proposal; Thesis I” Loc. 3374-3493.

“Thesis I: The fundamental truths of Christianity, as they are expressed in Holy Scripture, in the Apostles’ Creed, and in that of Nicea and Constantinople are binding on all partner churches on the one Church to be.” (Forde 2007, Loc. 3374).

Forde discusses this proposal on the dogmatic level as well as on “the level of the hermeneutics of dogma” before trying to revise the thesis (Forde 2007, Loc. 3377). From a standpoint of dogma, as one Church it is necessary to have one confession. The Scriptures and the creeds have not been overturned or replaced (Forde 2007, Loc. 3381) so the statement could well be affirmed.

The hermeneutic of the statement requires careful analysis. Forde suggests that the parties on opposite ends of theological spectrums would view the statement’s motives with suspicion, but a different suspicion from one another (Forde 2007, Loc. 3390). Discussions justifying theological arguments have always been made. The first question in this dogma is the meaning of “binding” (Forde 2007, Loc. 3408). One might question how some doctrines are more or less binding and what that implies (Forde 2007, Loc. 3412). Forde asks, in response, why the question is about dogma being binding rather than liberating (Forde 2007, Loc. 3425). This question completely redefines the entire thesis. On one end of the spectrum, to be free there must be no requirements (Forde 2007, Loc. 3439). On the other end of the spectrum it is the requirement which moves us to the proclamation of freedom (Forde 2007, Loc. 3448). The question may be better asked in terms of what the dogma contributes to gospel preaching (Forde 2007, Loc. 3457). The dogma therefore provides us with a law which directs us to reception of the gospel (Forde 2007, Loc. 3470). Forde’s alternative thesis points to the regulation of the Scripture and Creeds to move toward gospel proclamation (Forde 2007, Loc. 3484).

0 Comments

Justification and Sanctification

2/24/2016

0 Comments

 
Wednesdays are for Bits and Pieces  2/24/16
Forde, Gerhard O. The Preached God: Proclamation in Word and Sacrament. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2007. Kindle Electronic Edition.
Chapter 13, “The Lutheran View of Sanctification” Loc. 3090-3373.

Forde begins this chapter with a very striking statement. “Sanctification, if it is to be spoken of as something other than justification, is perhaps best defined as the art of getting used to the unconditional justification wrought by the grace of God for Jesus’ sake” (Forde 2007, Loc. 3090). In effect, “It is the justified life” (Forde 2007, Loc. 3094). This is not a moral or ethical change so much as it is the lifestyle of a new creation in Christ (Forde 2007, Loc. 3103). The problem Forde sees with our typical attitudes about sanctification is that we take it as our work to guard our justification (Forde 2007, Loc. 3117). This leaves us working out our holiness rather than trusting God’s ability to do so. Forde prefers that we keep our consideration of sanctification, as is done in Scripture, very closely linked to justification (Forde 2007, Loc. 3139). It is possibly more like different facets of the same gem of salvation (Forde 2007, Loc. 3143).

Forde therefore sees the starting point for sanctification to be “justification by faith alone, without the deeds of the law” (Forde 2007, Loc. 3152). This overturns our preconceptions about how life works. The conditional promises of the sinful world are gone. They must be replaced by the unconditional salvation in Christ (Forde 2007, Loc. 3184). In Romans 6:1-11 the way sin is conquered is through death. We do not overcome through the work of life but by being joined to Christ’s death (Forde 2007, Loc. 3198). This is entirely passive.

Forde next addresses the difficulty that we remain at once both a saint and a sinner (Forde 2007, Loc. 3232). The unconditional grace of God shows us that we are sinners even as it makes us saints. Again, if our understanding is based on the old conditionality the whole of salvation collapses (Forde 2007, Loc. 3241). It must be all of grace. However, rather than depend on free grace to make us holy, we seek conditional activity, trying to repent enough, change our attitudes, or doing some other pious work (Forde 2007, Loc. 3265). Rather, we need to trust that God in his grace has accomplished salvation and will complete his work in us (Forde 2007, Loc. 3275).

Forde then asks if there is growth in holiness in the Christian life (Forde 2007, Loc. 3298). “There is a kind of growth and progress, it is to be hoped, but it is growth in grace - a growth in coming to be captivated more and more, if we can so speak, by the totality, the unconditionality, of the grace of God” (Forde 2007, Loc. 3302). Sanctification, then, is learning to live in God’s grace rather than our works. The result of this dependence on God’s grace is that we finally become the humans God made us to be (Forde 2007, Loc. 3336). Then we are able to do good spontaneously (Forde 2007, Loc. 3345). We can care for others genuinely (Forde 2007, Loc. 3349). We are free to carry out our vocation before God and man (Forde 2007, Loc. 3353). We are more ready to be truthful (Forde 2007, Loc. 3361). In short, we are ready to depend on God’s grace.

0 Comments

Rejections of God's Law

2/17/2016

0 Comments

 
Wednesdays are for Bits and Pieces  2/17/16
Forde, Gerhard O. The Preached God: Proclamation in Word and Sacrament. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2007. Kindle Electronic Edition.
Chapter 12, “Fake Theology: Reflections on Antinomianism Past and Present” Loc. 2934-3089.

Forde observes that antinomianism, a denial of God’s law, seems the default reaction to legalism, absolutism, and other rigid norms (Forde 2007, Loc. 2938). He reflects that though Luther battled legalism he also battled antinomianism. In essence, antinomianism attempts to remove the law through denial or accommodation (Frode 2007, Loc. 2942). It “is a complex and interesting phenomenon theologically, because it is the attempt to correct one mistake by another” (Forde 2007, Loc. 2956). It ends the law, but by our decree rather than Jesus’ action.

To clarify the situation, Forde makes a distinction between “overt” and “covert” antinomianism. “Overt antinomianism simply asserts that since Christ is the end of the law, law is no longer of theological import and should be removed from the preaching of the church” (Forde 2007, Loc. 2968). At least this view generally directs people to the gospel. However, it often leaves faith out of the equation (Forde 2007, Loc. 2977). The result is that the eschatological hope is gone, replaced by a pre-emptive attempt to devise some other hope (Forde 2007, Loc. 3003). In covert antinomianism the law is changed in content or function (Forde 2007, Loc. 3011). This results from an underestimation of the gospel, in effect denying that the gospel is able to accomplish such a great salvation. It makes the law seem like gospel (Forde 2007, Loc. 3015).

Forde concludes that every form of antinomianism is destructive (Forde 2007, Loc. 3048). It rearranges the entire locus of our theology, drawing attention away from Jesus (Forde 2007, Loc. 3069). “[Here] we simply have to face the fact that there is no cure other than a more radical proclamation of Christ as the end of the law who because he is the end establishes the law prior to the end” (Forde 2007, Loc. 3083). Jesus alone is our answer.
0 Comments

Letting the Bible Interpret Us

2/10/2016

0 Comments

 
Wednesdays are for Bits and Pieces  2/10/16
Forde, Gerhard O. The Preached God: Proclamation in Word and Sacrament. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2007. Kindle Electronic Edition.
Chapter 11, “Human Sexuality and Romans, Chapter One” Loc. 2803-2934.

This essay begins with an extended passage from Romans chapter one. “It may just be that hearing it will go a long way toward answering our question, just as Paul intended so long ago” (Forde 2007, Loc. 2803). Forde goes on to ask if it is appropriate for us to interpret the passage or possibly for it to interpret us (Forde 2007, Loc. 2811). He then considers two different models of interpretation of scripture. “In the first and perhaps most universally assumed model, the exegete as ‘subject’ stands over against the text as the ‘object’ to be interpreted” (Forde 2007, Loc. 2816). This method always leaves some level of subjectivity. The other model is “that sacred Scripture interprets itself” (Forde 2007, Loc. 2824). Here, “the Scripture comes to interpret the exegete” (Forde 2007, Loc. 2829).

In Romans chapter 1, given this principle that Scripture exegetes us, we find our question is who can rescue us (Forde 2007, Loc. 2842). The Scripture does its work to point us to Jesus. The law of God is affirmed as it convicts of sin and authoritatively sends sinners to Jesus for forgiveness (Forde 2007, Loc. 2862). “It is because Christ and Christ alone is the end [of the law] that I can let the law stand just as it is” (Forde 2007, Loc. 2867). The concept of Jesus as the fulfiller of Scripture is paramount.

Forde goes on to study the outcome of a theology which allows Scripture to interpret us (Forde 2007, Loc. 2888). The texts which we might question in terms of human sexuality finally are questions of authority and of sin and grace (Forde 2007, Loc. 2900).

0 Comments

True Freedom

2/3/2016

0 Comments

 
Wednesdays are for Bits and Pieces  2/3/16
Forde, Gerhard O. The Preached God: Proclamation in Word and Sacrament. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2007. Kindle Electronic Edition.
Chapter 10, “Lutheran Faith and American Freedom” Loc. 2671-2803.

Forde considers the contemporary view of freedom in America as opposed to a biblical view, saying, “what most Americans call freedom today is what theology - particularly Lutheran theology - would call bondage” (Forde 2007, Loc. 2671). Historically, freedom has always needed restraints, preferably voluntary restraints, to prevent it from running wild (Forde 2007, Loc. 2676). It was through religious values that the American founding fathers found this restraint. Forde argues that Christianity has been removed from the equation, resulting in political and social decline (Forde 2007, Loc. 2680). Lutheran theology has always promoted freedom (Forde 2007, Loc. 2693), but this does not require assimilation to the broader culture. The voice of the gospel is essential in all our work (Forde 2007, Loc. 2707). Forde asserts that this will happen only when God’s law is seen in its power (Forde 2007, Loc. 2712). Further, “much of the theology of the cross today seems to lack or at least ignore the resurrection” (Forde 2007, Loc. 275e). Despite our rejection of Jesus, God raised him from the dead for us. The work was accomplished.

The devaluation of the gospel is not a new problem (Forde 2007, Loc. 2745). Classical Protestant faith has shown that Christians are chosen by God, therefore live out God’s law (Forde 2007, Loc. 2750). Shifting the burden to the obligation for us to have faith erodes the strength of God’s salvation (Forde 2007, Loc. 2760). It results in making qualitative judgments about Christians. The result lies not in law-based standards, but in genuine gospel (Forde 2007, Loc. 2782). The law needs to be preached to reveal sin, but then the gospel, with so much force as to create a new being, must come (Forde 2007, Loc. 2795).
0 Comments

Powerful Gospel

1/27/2016

0 Comments

 
Wednesdays are for Bits and Pieces  1/27/16
Forde, Gerhard O. The Preached God: Proclamation in Word and Sacrament. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2007. Kindle Electronic Edition.
​
Chapter 9, “Speaking the Gospel Today” Loc. 2230-2670.

It is common to hear calls for relevance in preaching. Forde cites numerous commentators who suggest the world is a dynamic being which changes before we have time to make analysis (Forde 2007, 2230). Finding the cause of a situation cannot reverse the situation. Often, Forde says, we are attempting to resolve a problem of the kingdom of the left (civil authority) using means of the kingdom of the right (churchly authority) (Forde 2007, Loc. 2243). Being grasped by the gospel from outside of ourselves is central to our identity as Christians. This is what makes us Christians (Forde 2007, Loc. 2257). The gospel is in direct contradiction to a theology of glory which tries to claim credit for salvation (Forde 2007, Loc. 2278). Looking at the world and the church as a theologian of the cross we find that where we have gone astray has been in our attempts at living by a theology of glory (Forde 2007, Loc. 2316). Our normal reaction to these problems is to strive harder rather than to trust more (Forde 2007, Loc. 2326). A greater striving for the Law may result in our undoing (Forde 2007, Loc. 2349). The alternative gospels that we have created need to be rejected in favor of a true biblical gospel (Forde 2007, Loc. 2404). To return to the original issue, then, Forde observes the quest for relevance is one for law rather than gospel. Churches which accept that mission always end up in decline (Forde 2007, Loc. 2430). Forde traces that decline as it springs from a sentimental pietism which finally denies the need to trust God and live a holy life (Forde 2007, Loc. 2463).

Forde goes on to apply these cautions and analyses to preaching (Forde 2007, Loc. 2487). looking within results in an interpretation of God’s Word lacking in power. Both law and gospel become ineffective. Yet objectively the offense of sin does not go away (Forde 2007, Loc. 2500). The cure for this problem is a recovery of “the proper preaching and distinction between law and gospel (Forde 2007, Loc. 2517). To recover this strength of the law and gospel, Forde affirms we must not only explain God’s Word but finally “do” it (Forde 2007, Loc. 2544). To reach that point we find the root issues behind the text (Forde 2007, Loc. 2548). The Word of God is then understood in terms of its function, for instance, attacking or giving life (Forde 2007, Loc. 2581). The hearer, also, must be recognized as one who suffers from a will bound to sin (Forde 2007, Loc. 2611). The preaching brings resolution to the entire plight of man, releasing us from sin and from bondage to try harder (Forde 2007, Loc. 2615).

0 Comments

The Power of Forgiveness

1/20/2016

0 Comments

 
Wednesdays are for Bits and Pieces  1/20/16
Forde, Gerhard O. The Preached God: Proclamation in Word and Sacrament. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2007. Kindle Electronic Edition.
Chapter 8, “Absolution: Systematic Considerations” Loc. 2067-2229.

In absolution God promises forgiveness of sins, which Forde asserts does actually imply that God forgets our sins (Forde 2007, Loc. 2072). This is critical to the Christian life. Forde continues that “absolution, the concrete act of forgiving sin, from me to you in the name of the crucified and risen Jesus Christ here in the living present, is the only solution to the systematic problem of the absoluteness of God” (Ford 2007, Loc. 2076).

As the “absolute” God is the one who is entirely free in and of himself (Forde 2007, Loc. 2081). This is a situation which should bind our wills and consciences, though God does not seem to restrict us very actively (Forde 2007, Loc. 2094). This, Forde says with Luther, applies to things “below us” - those mundane affairs of life (Forde 2007, Loc. 2099). When we come up against the absolute God, though, we are driven to try to rescue ourselves. We necessarily fall into sin (Forde 2007, Loc. 2110). We elevate our desires to the level of divinity. The solution Forde sees to this is only receiving forgiveness (Forde 2007, Loc. 2120). This is counter to our established intuition of using correct theology to make change. It cannot establish forgiveness in place of absolution.

As forgiveness is undervalued, Forde alleges that theology can become increasingly abstract and separate from actual life and pastoral care (Forde 2007, Loc. 1264). Counter to this, in Christ God has had mercy on his people (Forde 2007, Loc. 2157). This counter-intuitive move disrupts all our plans by showing God as the one who forgives without conditions (Forde 2007, Loc. 2171). What does Forde view as the effect of absolution of the believer? For some reason Christians have often wished to limit forgiveness of sin (Forde 2007, Loc. 2194). The forgiveness of the gospel is liberating and powerful. Luther strove to make that absolution as full and free as possible (Forde 2007, Loc. 2198). This absolution in effect puts the sinner to death in order to make him new (Forde 2007, Loc. 2220).

0 Comments

The Gift of Communion

1/13/2016

0 Comments

 
Wednesdays are for Bits and Pieces  1/13/16
Forde, Gerhard O. The Preached God: Proclamation in Word and Sacrament. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2007. Kindle Electronic Edition.
Chapter 7, “The Lord’s Supper as the Testament of Jesus” Loc. 1999-2066.

Because justification is by grace through faith, Forde asserts “that the Lord’s Supper is properly understood and used only when it is administered and received as gospel - as sheer, unmerited gift” (Forde 2007, Loc. 1999). Regardless of the type of meal, Passover or not, the context is that of Jesus’ approach to his betrayal (Forde 2007, Loc. 2006). By Jesus’ own words, he gives his body and blood over for his disciples (Forde 2007, Loc. 2011). In doing so, Jesus names his disciples as his heirs (Forde 2007, Loc. 2020).

Forde observes that the understanding of communion as a re-enactment reverses the entire meaning (Forde 2007, Loc. 2032). In this view we are presenting the body and blood to God rather than seeing that he presents himself to us. This robs the sacrament of the gospel.

As a systematic consideration Forde holds that the term “testament” rather than “covenant” rightly expresses the inheritance coming from Jesus to his people (Forde 2007, oc. 2036). Further, the sacrament is a real event, not a representation (Forde 2007, Loc. 2044). The repetition is held to be a repetition of Jesus’ giving himself for his people, nothing less (Forde 2007, Loc. 2050). The event is as real for our time as for the apostles.
0 Comments

The Gift of Infant Baptism

1/6/2016

0 Comments

 
Wednesdays are for Bits and Pieces  1/6/16
Forde, Gerhard O. The Preached God: Proclamation in Word and Sacrament. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2007. Kindle Electronic Edition.
Chapter 6, “Something to Believe: A Theological Perspective on Infant Baptism” Loc. 1798-1998.

Forde cites the current dispute between those who assert baptism as a work which cannot contribute to salvation and those who assert it as a gift of grace which imparts saving faith (Forde 2007, Loc. 1798). He speculates that some would even need to remove children from all means of grace to be consistent (Forde 2007, Loc. 1806). Forde attempts to frame the question in terms of a need for infants to be included in baptism (Forde 2007, Loc. 1814). He compares Barth’s explanation of baptism, which has a great deal of influence. At the heart of the question is whether baptism is best seen as law or gospel (Forde 2007, Loc. 1828). Forde views baptism as a matter of gospel, thus the questions about it from a standpoint of law are often intended to entrap (Forde 2007, Loc. 1837). If baptism is a gift, then, we ask not who must be baptized but if there is a compelling reason to exclude someone (Forde 2007, Loc. 1856). Forde agrees with Barth that the answer of whether baptism is for children is not specific in the Bible. He therefore looks for an answer based on the meaning and purpose of baptism (Forde 2007, Loc. 1860). If, in fact, baptism is an external thing which directs our faith to the work of God for us (Forde 2007, Loc. 1870), God’s grace alone is recognized and we are genuinely passive recipients of mercy (Forde 2007, Loc. 1879). Baptism thus defends us from claims that we did anything worthy of salvation. It is grace (Forde 2007, Loc. 1888). Any claims that baptism does not save then deny the power of God’s grace. It is a gift which is received by faith in the concrete promise of God (Forde 2007, Loc. 1902). Biblically, faith always receives something outside itself which existed first. Faith does not create reality, but receives it (Forde 2007, Loc. 1912). Forde concludes, “There is, therefore, no overriding theological reason for withholding baptism from infants” (Forde 2007, Loc. 1924).

Forde goes on to discuss how baptism is emblematic for our understanding of how theology in general works (Forde 2007, Loc. 1938). Theology which turns to the inner life, faith, or belief ultimately claims that man is responsible for his salvation and preservation (Forde 2007, Loc. 1946). Forde suggests the cure for this in demonstration of God’s free grace (Forde 2007, Loc. 1960).

0 Comments

Boundaries of Ministry

12/30/2015

0 Comments

 
Wednesdays are for Bits and Pieces  12/30/15
Forde, Gerhard O. The Preached God: Proclamation in Word and Sacrament. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2007. Kindle Electronic Edition.
Chapter 5, “Public Ministry and Its Limits” Loc. 1610-1797.

The public ministry to which Forde refers in this chapter is that ministry of the one ordained to serve in Word and Sacrament (Forde 2007, Loc. 1610). This ministry is limited in its scope, as it cannot reach beyond the biblical bounds of the Gospel (Forde 2007, Loc. 1613). Forde first considers the various rankings which are often identified in ministry and concludes that a distinction of deacon, pastor, and bishop is normally unwarranted (Forde 2007, Loc. 1623).

The ministry “is the actual doing of the divine election in the living present by setting bound sinners free through the Word of the cross” (Forde 2007, Loc. 1632). God simply works through the minister to do His will. This is contradicted by Rome’s view of a priest or Protestantism’s view of a teacher (Forde 2007, Loc. 1642). Within Forde’s view of public ministry, the ordination appoints the follower of Christ to a role of ministry which is public, rather than private (Forde 2007, Loc. 1651). This is borne out by articles 5 and 14 of the Augsburg Confession, as well as article 28 (Forde 2007, Loc. 1661). Forde discusses the rather terse wording of Augsburg Confession article 14, where the term “rite vocatus”  is used for the call to public ministry (Forde 2007, Loc. 1676). This is God’s call but administered through God’s people (Forde 2007, Loc. 1681). The means of administration is purposely vague.

In discussing the public ministry, Forde considers it very important to find the biblical boundaries of the office (Forde 2007, Loc. 1714). Overstepping the limits of the office leads to abuse and tyranny (Forde 2007, Loc. 1728). The great task of the minister is delivering the gospel, serving rather than ruling. The Reformation clarified that. “The only authority bishops can wield by divine right is identical to that of an evangelical pastor: to preach the gospel, to forgive sins, judge doctrine, condemn doctrine contrary to the gospel, and exclude the ungodly from the Christian community” (Forde 2007, Loc. 1752). Forde concludes that the bishop has no other authority, regardless of the history of the office. It must be a biblical authority (Forde 2007, Loc. 1761).

0 Comments

Sacramental Preaching

12/23/2015

0 Comments

 
Wednesdays are for Bits and Pieces  12/23/15
Forde, Gerhard O. The Preached God: Proclamation in Word and Sacrament. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2007. Kindle Electronic Edition.
Chapter 4, “Preaching the Sacraments” Loc. 1183-1609.

Forde begins this portion of his discussion by considering a way in which preaching may be a sacrament. In preaching the pastor behaves in a sacramental way by doing something to give Christ to the congregation (Forde 2007, Loc. 1183). Unfortunately, many times preaching gives grace then takes it back again (Forde 2007, Loc. 1186). People therefore often value the sacraments as they are purely gospel. Those who do not value them may well not have heard them preached (Forde 2007, Loc. 1197). “Preaching in a sacramental fashion is doing to the hearers what the text authorizes you to do to them” (Forde 2007, Loc. 1223). The text itself is in charge of the preaching situation,never our experience (Forde 2007, Loc. 1233).

Rather than try to explain the task of sacramental preaching Forde illustrates it with several texts. In Matthew 13:44 (Forde 2007, Loc. 1283), the theologian of the law might encourage seeking out hidden treasure or giving all to buy the good treasure. The gospel points out that in the parable the man did nothing to find the treasure. It was gift. The preacher’s action is to tell the hearers they have the treasure of Jesus’ death (Forde 2007, Loc. 1315). Likewise in the parable of the laborers in the vineyard those who are late receive a great gift (Forde 2007, Loc. 1325).

Forde next discusses preaching the sacraments in particular (Forde 2007, Loc. 1351). This is the way people will grasp and value the sacraments. Preaching the sacraments is not merely teaching about them (Forde 2007, Loc. 1370). It is difficult as it involves delivering the significance of an action by using words (Forde 2007, Loc. 1375). Yet Forde illustrates that it is God’s Word that empowers the Sacraments. It cannot be turned back (Forde 2007, Loc. 1414). The preaching, like the Sacraments, serves to deliver faith (Forde 2007, Loc. 1452). It is all finally a matter of killing and bringing to life. The power, as Forde illustrates, is in the Word. He goes on to give an example of a sermon for a baptism, showing the free grace of the sacrament (Forde 2007, Loc. 1523). After this explanation, Forde gives several short chapel sermons on the sacraments (Forde 2007, Loc. 1554).

0 Comments

Concrete Views of Christ

12/16/2015

0 Comments

 
Wednesdays are for Bits and Pieces  12/16/15
Forde, Gerhard O. The Preached God: Proclamation in Word and Sacrament. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2007. Kindle Electronic Edition.
Chapter 3, “Karl Barth on the consequences of Lutheran Christology” Loc. 958-1182

Forde considers Karl Barth a an example of a Reformed theologian who had considered Lutheran theology carefully. Barth saw Lutheran Christology as problematic because it could have led to a view of anthropology as more important than theology (Forde 2007, Loc. 961). In this chapter, Forde’s purpose is “to look at two particular doctrinal issues in the argument between Barth and the Lutherans as a kind of exercise in the consequences of Christology “ (Forde 2007, Loc. 966). Barth’s specific targets are “the genus maiestaticum, the doctrine that the risen Christ is everywhere present in his human nature…[and] that the communication of divine attributes to the human nature of the exalted Christ seems to leave the door open to the idea that all humans could become divine” (Forde 2007, Loc. 976).

Barth’s consideration of the issue is in his Church Dogmatics IV/2 (Forde 2007, Loc. 978). His initial objection has to do with the subjectivity of interpretation, as hard data on internal attributes is elusive. Barth’s view of the discussion is that Lutheran arguments were not convincing and that the Reformed failed to persuade the Lutherans of error (Forde 2007, Loc. 992).

The classic Reformed emphasis was on Jesus as true man and true God, while the Lutheran explanation, Barth considered, could lead to a preoccupation with the explanation of attributes rather than reflection on Jesus’ power to save (Forde 2007, Loc. 1006). More seriously, Barth was concerned that the idea of divinization of Christ left the door open to every person becoming divine as well (Forde 2007, Loc. 1011). Yet, Forde says, Barth does not make his case using historical evidence but with rhetorical questions (Forde 2007, Loc. 1016). Forde illustrates with quotes from Barth.

Forde’s answer to the situation is, first, to observe that Regin Prenter and Gerhard Ebeling have already answered the charges very thoroughly (Forde 2007, Loc. 1041). Yet Lutherans also have a tendency to subjectivize and make an abstraction of Jesus (Forde 2007, Loc. 1050). Forde affirms that dogmatic theology cannot effectively guard against this (Forde 2007, Loc. 1058). Theology in the end is an abstraction. The cure, says Forde, is in proclamation of the truth (Forde 2007, Loc. 1060). Barth, on the other hand, will say that systematic theology is not adequate to create change, but he does not say what is effective (Forde 2007, Loc. 1074). Lutheran Pietists have attempted to find a solution in Heilsgeschichte, the history of our salvation. Yet this is also unsatisfactory (Forde 2007, Loc. 1098). Barth’s attempt to refute Lutheran Christology may finally result in separating the humanity and deity of Christ (Forde 2007, Loc. 1121).

Forde concludes then that theologizing eventually becomes abstract (Forde 2007, Loc. 1126). The best use of theology should, to be effective, lead to proclamation in Word and sacraments rather than to further doctrinal exploration (Forde 2007, Loc. 1147). The result of proclamation is faith in Jesus (Forde 2007, Loc. 1161).

0 Comments

Mysticism and Revelation

12/9/2015

0 Comments

 
Wednesdays are for Bits and Pieces  12/9/15
Forde, Gerhard O. The Preached God: Proclamation in Word and Sacrament. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2007. Kindle Electronic Edition.
Chapter 2, “When the Old Gods Fail: Martin Luther’s Critique of Mysticism” Loc. 783-957.

Luther’s view of revelation was that Jesus was revealed adequately in Scripture (Forde 2007, Loc. 787). Additional visions were very likely temptations of the devil. At the same time, though, Luther testifies to having seen visions while praying fervently and meditating on the work of Christ (Forde 2007, Loc. 796). While Luther will use mystical language he rejects much of the mystical experience.

Forde observes that defining mysticism adequately is often a problem (Forde 2007, Loc. 81). Thus he looks rather for conditions in which mysticism arises, when “the abyss, the distance, between God and humans has become apparent (Forde 2007, Loc. 814). The mystic tries to take old concepts and make them work anew. This is often done by seeking unmediated, personal spiritual contact (Forde 2007, Loc. 824).

This situation is paralleled in Luther, who sought a way to deal with the scholastic tradition which had mediated Christian life up to his time (Forde 2007, Loc. 833). The experience he sought would be found in the Scripture (Forde 2007, Loc. 843). The work of the Christian then includes an individual appropriation of the concepts of Scripture (Forde 2007, Loc. 852). Further, often Christians look at mystical signs, such as liturgical actions and see both the sign and the reality to which it points (Forde 2007, Loc. 865). Thus there are different levels or styles of mysticism. In Luther, the text of Scripture is itself active in the believer (Forde 2007, Loc. 879). Forde explains Luther’s objection to the mysticism of his day by observing “that for Luther the text actually does what the mystic says it only signifies (Forde 2007, Loc. 905). The goal of godliness is the same but the mysticism grounded in something other than the text is futile. Finally, we all depend on words, whether those of God or our own words (Forde 2007, Loc. 941). Luther would urge dependence on God’s Word.

0 Comments

The Invisible God

12/2/2015

0 Comments

 
Wednesdays are for Bits and Pieces  12/2/15
Forde, Gerhard O. The Preached God: Proclamation in Word and Sacrament. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2007. Kindle Electronic Edition.
Chapter 1, “Whatever Happened to God? God Not Preached” Loc. 481-782.

Forde opens by responding to a campaign in American popular Christianity, “Jesus is the answer.” “The question...has gradually become more clear to me: Whatever happened to God?” (Forde 2007, 481). The answer Forde reaches is Jesus. Many people know of Luther’s distinction between God hidden apart from his works and revealed through his works. Luther linked this concept to preaching in the Bondage of the Will (Forde 2007, Loc. 484). The speaking we do about God in preaching is different from that of everyday communication. Forde illustrates the difference between proclamation of God’s truth, which shows the Gospel, and explanation of God’s truth, which attempts to save by means of good doctrine (Forde 2007, Loc. 493).

Forde point out a result of this theologizing is a form of pietism that can do without God at all. We simply need to be good (Forde 2007, Loc. 507). This domesticated God is nothing like the wild and untamed God of the Bible. “Whatever happened to God? God has fallen victim to explanations, to theology itself - theology about God-not-preached. Explanation replaces proclamation” (Forde 2007, Loc. 541). Forde ties this idea with the concept that God somehow finds his identity in our love, making God need us (Forde 2007, Loc. 563). This is not what the invisible God is like.

Forde next questions whether the work of systematic theologians has gone astray by not pursuing the true gospel (Forde 2007, Loc. 577). In Jesus’ victory over death, we are not given a lesson but a proclamation (Forde 2007, Loc. 585). “Proclamation means finally to stop talking about it, and actually give it. It means not talking about God, but speaking for God” (Forde 2007, Loc. 604). Proclamation, then, is more specific and targeted than preaching. It is not didactic in nature (Forde 207, Loc. 623). It declares God’s will and delivers the gift. Forde illustrates the point where explanation must leave off and declaration take place in vivid terms.

So what has happened to God? We have forgotten to proclaim him (Forde 2007, Loc. 680). What is the answer is Jesus. At the end of all we cannot explain faith and forgiveness. We proclaim it and let God work it out (Forde 2007, Loc. 713).
0 Comments

    ​Help Fuel This Ministry by Clicking Here!

    All the work of Wittenberg Door Campus Ministry, including this blog, is supported by the generosity of people like you. Please consider joining our team of prayer and financial supporters. Read more here!
    Please Note: The opinions presented in blog posts are not necessarily those of Wittenberg Door Campus Ministry. Frequently we report on contrary views, often without comment. Please chime in on the discussion.

    About Throwing Inkwells

    When Martin Luther was dealing with struggles in his life he once saw what appeared to be an angelic being. Not trusting that he was going to be informed by someone other than the God revealed in Scripture, he took the appearance to be untrustworthy and hurled his inkwell at it. The chipped place in the plaster wall is still visible at the Wartburg Castle, though apparently the ink stain on the wall has been refreshed periodically by the caretaker.

    Blog Feeds

    RSS Feed

    Want to keep up with what's happening at Wittenberg Door? Subscribe to our mailing list!

    Categories

    All
    1 Corinthians
    1 John
    1 Kings
    1 Peter
    1 Samuel
    1 Thessalonians
    1 Timothy
    2019-02-feb
    2 Chronicles
    2 Corinthians
    2-john
    2 Kings
    2 Peter
    2 Samuel
    2 Thessalonians
    2 Timothy
    3-john
    Academic-success
    Acts
    Advent 1
    Advent-1-a
    Advent-1b
    Advent-1c
    Advent 2
    Advent-2-a
    Advent-2b
    Advent-2c
    Advent 3
    Advent-3-a
    Advent-3b
    Advent-3c
    Advent 4
    Advent-4-a
    Advent-4b
    Advent-4c
    Akagi 2016
    Alesso-2009
    Alexander 1999
    Allegory
    Allitt-2010
    All Saints' Day
    Alon 1996
    Amos
    Anaphora
    Anointing
    Anunciation
    Apollinaris Of Hierapolis
    Apostolical Constitutions
    Aristides Of Athens
    Aristotle
    Aryeh 2021
    Ascension Day
    Ash Wednesday
    Athenagoras Of Athens
    Audet 1996
    Augustine
    Bakker 1993
    Balabanski 1997
    Bammel 1996
    Baptism
    Baptism Of Christ
    Baptism-of-the-lord-b
    Bardy 1938
    Baron 2019
    Baron & Maponya 2020
    Bauckham 1984
    Bauckham 2006
    Bauckham 2007
    Beale 1984
    Belief
    Belonging
    Ben-Amos 1999
    Betz 1996
    Biesenthal 1893
    Bigg 1904
    Bigg 1905
    Blogcation
    Blomberg 1984
    Boehme-2010
    Botha 1967
    Botha 1993
    Braaten 2007
    Bruce1988
    Bruce-1988
    Bryennios
    Butler 1960
    Caneday 2017
    Canonicity
    Capon1998
    Capon-1998
    Carr 2010
    Carson-1991
    Carson-moo-2005
    Catholicism
    Cerfaux 1959
    Chilton 1984
    Chrismation
    Christmas-1b
    Christmas-1c
    Christmas Dawn
    Christmas-day
    Christmas Eve
    Christmas Midnight
    Chronicles
    Circumcision And Naming Of Christ
    Cody 1995
    Colossians
    Conditions
    Confession Of Peter
    Confessions
    Connolly 1932
    Connolly 1933
    Connolly 1934
    Constanza-2013
    Cooper & Lioy 2018
    Costa 2021
    Court 1981
    Culley 1986
    Cyprian
    Daly 1978
    Daniel
    Danielou 1956
    Davids 1984
    Davis 1995
    DeHalleux 1996
    Dehandschutter 1995
    Deuteronomy
    Didache
    Diversity
    Divine Fellowship
    Dix 1933
    Dix2005
    Dix-2005
    Doane 1994
    Draper
    Draper 1984
    Draper 1989
    Draper 1995
    Draper-1996
    Draper-1997
    Draper-2000
    Draper-2006
    Dube 2016
    Due 2003
    Easter-2
    Easter-2a
    Easter2b
    Easter-2c
    Easter-3
    Easter-3a
    Easter-3b
    Easter-3c
    Easter-4
    Easter-4a
    Easter-4b
    Easter-4c
    Easter-5
    Easter-5a
    Easter-5b
    Easter-6
    Easter-6a
    Easter-6b
    Easter-6c
    Easter-7
    Easter-7a
    Easter-7b
    Easter-7c
    Easter-b
    Easter-day
    Easter-monday
    Easter-sunday-a
    Easter-sunday-c
    Easter-sunrise
    Easter-tuesday
    Easter-wednesday
    Ecclesiastes
    Eleutheria2014
    Elman-1999
    Ephesians
    Epiphany
    Epiphany-1c
    Epiphany-2-a
    Epiphany-2c
    Epiphany-3-a
    Epiphany-3b
    Epiphany-3c
    Epiphany-4-a
    Epiphany-4b
    Epiphany-4c
    Epiphany-5-a
    Epiphany-5b
    Epiphany-5c
    Epiphany-6-a
    Epiphany-6c
    Epiphany-7-a
    Epiphany-c
    Epistle Of Barnabas
    Esther
    Eucharist
    Eve-of-the-circumcision-of-christ
    Exodus
    Exodus-20
    Experiential Reading
    Eybers 1975
    Ezekiel
    Ezra
    Fagerberg1988
    Fagerberg-1988
    Farrell-1987
    Flew-2007
    Flusser-1996
    Forde-2007
    Fraade-1999
    France-2007
    Galatians
    Garrow 2004
    Gender
    Genesis
    Gero 1977
    Gibbins 1935
    Gibbs 2006
    Glover-1958
    Goga & Popa 2019
    Gonzalez-2010
    Good-friday
    Gospels
    Grosvener-schaff-1885
    Grosvenor-1884
    Guardian-of-jesus
    Habakkuk
    Haggai
    Hagner 1984
    Harnack-1884
    Harris 1887
    Harris 1984
    Hearon 2004
    Hearon 2010
    Hebrews
    Heilmann 2018
    Henderson1992
    Henderson-1992
    Henderson 1995
    Hezser 2010
    History
    Hoffman-1986
    Holy Cross Day
    Holy-innocents
    Holy-saturday
    Horsley 2010
    Hosea
    Hutchens2013
    Hymes-1994
    Ignatius Of Antioch
    Infertility
    Isaiah
    Jaffee-1999
    James
    James Of Jerusalem
    James The Elder
    Jefford 1989
    Jefford 1995
    Jeffreys-1986
    Jeremiah
    Jerome
    Job
    Joel
    John
    Jonah
    Jones & Mirecki 1995
    Joseph
    Joshua
    Jude
    Judges
    Jungmann-1959
    Justin Martyr
    Kelber-1987
    Kelber-1995
    Kelber 2002
    Kelber 2010
    Kelber & Sanders 2010
    Kevil
    Kings
    Kleinig-2013
    Kloppenborg 1979
    Kloppenborg 1995
    Koch2010
    Kok 2015
    Kolb2000
    Kolb-2000
    Kolbarand2008
    Kolb-arand-2008
    Kurekchomycz2009
    Lake 1905
    Lamentations
    Last-sunday-of-the-church-year
    Last-sunday-of-the-church-year-a
    Last-sunday-of-the-church-year-b
    Last-sunday-of-the-church-year-c
    LaVerdiere 1996
    Layton 1968
    Lectionary
    Lent-1
    Lent-1-a
    Lent-1b
    Lent-1c
    Lent-2
    Lent-2-a
    Lent-2b
    Lent-2c
    Lent-3
    Lent-3-a
    Lent-3b
    Lent-3c
    Lent-4
    Lent-4-a
    Lent-4b
    Lent-4c
    Lent-5
    Lent-5-a
    Lent-5b
    Lent-5c
    Lessing2014
    Lessing-2014
    Leviticus
    Lincoln-1885
    Lindemann 1997
    Literary Character
    Liturgy
    Livesey 2012
    Long-2009
    Lord-1986
    Lord-1987
    Lord's Prayer
    Luke
    Luther
    Maas-2014
    Maccoull-1999
    Maier 1984
    Malachi
    Manuscripts
    Mark
    Marty-2016
    Martyrdom Of John The Baptist
    Martyrs
    Mary Magdalene
    Mary Mother Of Our Lord
    Mason-1998
    Massaux 1993 (1950)
    Matthew
    Matthias
    Mazza 1995
    Mazza-1996
    Mazza 1999
    Mbamalu 2014
    McDonald 1980
    McDonnell & Montague 1991
    McKean 2003
    Mcknight-2014
    Micah
    Middleton 1935
    Milavec 1995
    Milavec-2003
    Milavec2012
    Miller 2019
    Missional
    Mitch-2010
    Mitchell 1995
    Molina-evers-1998
    Monday-in-holy-week
    Montenyohl-1993
    Morris-1992
    Motyer-1993
    Mueller-2006
    Muilenburg 1929
    Music
    Nahum
    Nehemiah
    Neufeld-1999
    Newsletter
    Newtestament
    New Testament
    Niditch-1995
    Niditch 2003
    Niebuhr 1956
    Niederwimmer-1982
    Niederwimmer 1995
    Niederwimmer-1996
    Numbers
    Obadiah
    Oldtestament
    Old Testament
    Olsen-1986
    Ong-1987
    Ong-1988
    Ong-1995
    Oralit
    Orality
    Ordination
    Orphan-hosting
    Osborne-2002
    Osborne-2013
    Ozment1980
    Ozment-1980
    Palm-sunday
    Palm-sunday-a
    Palm-sunday-c
    Pardee 1995
    Parks-1986
    Passionb
    Patterson 1995
    Pearce-1993
    Pentateuch
    Pentecost-10a
    Pentecost-10b
    Pentecost-10c
    Pentecost-11a
    Pentecost-11b
    Pentecost-11c
    Pentecost-12a
    Pentecost-12b
    Pentecost-12c
    Pentecost-13a
    Pentecost-13b
    Pentecost13c
    Pentecost-13c
    Pentecost-14a
    Pentecost-14b
    Pentecost-14c
    Pentecost-15
    Pentecost-15a
    Pentecost-15b
    Pentecost-15c
    Pentecost-16
    Pentecost-16a
    Pentecost-16b
    Pentecost-16c
    Pentecost-17a
    Pentecost-17b
    Pentecost 17C
    Pentecost-18a
    Pentecost-18b
    Pentecost 18 C
    Pentecost-19a
    Pentecost-19b
    Pentecost 19 C
    Pentecost-1a
    Pentecost-20a
    Pentecost-20b
    Pentecost 20 C
    Pentecost-21a
    Pentecost-21b
    Pentecost 21 C
    Pentecost-22a
    Pentecost-22b
    Pentecost 22 C
    Pentecost-23a
    Pentecost-23b
    Pentecost 23 C
    Pentecost-24a
    Pentecost-24b
    Pentecost-24-c
    Pentecost-25b
    Pentecost-25-c
    Pentecost-26b
    Pentecost-26-c
    Pentecost-2a
    Pentecost-2b
    Pentecost-2c
    Pentecost-3a
    Pentecost-3b
    Pentecost-3c
    Pentecost-4a
    Pentecost-4b
    Pentecost-4c
    Pentecost-5a
    Pentecost-5b
    Pentecost-5c
    Pentecost-6a
    Pentecost-6b
    Pentecost-6c
    Pentecost-7a
    Pentecost-7b
    Pentecost-7c
    Pentecost-8a
    Pentecost-8b
    Pentecost-8c
    Pentecost-9a
    Pentecost-9b
    Pentecost-9c
    Pentecost-b
    Pentecost-c
    Pentecost Eve
    Pentecost Monday
    Pentecost Sunday
    Pentecost Tuesday
    Petersen 1994
    Peterson2010
    Peterson 2010
    Philemon
    Philippians
    Philosophy
    Picirilli 1988
    Pick 1908
    Pieper1924
    Pieper 1924
    Pieper 1968
    Piper 1947
    Powell 2000
    Prayer
    Preaching
    Presentation Of Our Lord
    Proctor 2019
    Proper-19c
    Proper-20c
    Proper 21C
    Proper 22C
    Proper 23C
    Proper 24C
    Proper 25C
    Proper 26C
    Proper 27C
    Proper 28C
    Prophets
    Proverbs
    Psalm
    Psalms
    Quinquagesima
    Quintilian
    Rabbinic Character
    Real Presence
    Receptivity
    Reed 1995
    Reformation
    Reformation Day
    Reinhartz 2018
    Resurrection
    Revelation
    Rhetoric
    Rhoads 2010
    Richardson & Gooch 1984
    Riggs 1995
    Ritual Meal
    Romans
    Rordorf 1996
    Rosenberg 1986
    Rosenberg 1987
    Rosenfeld-levene-2012
    Rueger-2016
    Russo 1994
    Ruth
    Sacrament
    Sacrifice
    Saenger 1999
    Sailhamer1992
    Sailhamer-1992
    Sale 1996
    Samuel
    Scaer2004
    Scaer-2004
    Schaff 1886
    Schaff 1888
    Schaff 1889
    Schaff 2014
    Schaff-2014
    Schollgen
    Schwarz 2005
    Scriptural Usage
    Seeliger 1996
    Septuagesima
    Sermon
    Sexagesima
    Simon And Jude
    Smith-2009
    Smith 2018
    Sommerville-2006
    Songofsongs
    St. Andrew
    Stark 1997
    St. Barnabas
    St. Bartholomew
    St. John
    St. John The Baptist
    St Luke
    St Mark
    St Matthew
    St. Matthias
    St Michael And All Angels
    St. Paul
    St. Peter And Paul
    St Philip And St James
    Strawbridge 2017
    St. Stephen
    St. Thomas
    St. Titus
    Sunday Of The Passion
    Tatian
    Taylor 1888
    TDNT
    Teaching
    Telfer 1939
    Tertullian
    Textual Comparison
    Textual Integrity
    Theophilos 2018
    Theophilus Of Antioch
    Thielman 2010
    Thursday In Holy Week
    Timothy
    Titus
    Transfiguration
    Transfiguration-a
    Transfigurationb
    Transfiguration-c
    Trinity 1
    Trinity 10
    Trinity 11
    Trinity 12
    Trinity 13
    Trinity 14
    Trinity 15
    Trinity 16
    Trinity 17
    Trinity 18
    Trinity 19
    Trinity 2
    Trinity 20
    Trinity 21
    Trinity 22
    Trinity 23
    Trinity 3
    Trinity 4
    Trinity 5
    Trinity 6
    Trinity 7
    Trinity 8
    Trinity 9
    Trinity-a
    Trinity-b
    Trinity-c
    Trinity Sunday
    Tsang 2009
    Tuckett
    Tuesday In Holy Week
    Tuilier 1995
    Twelftree 1984
    Two Ways
    Ty 19
    Van Der Merwe 2017
    Van Der Merwe 2019
    Van Der Watt 2008
    Van De Sandt 2002
    Van De Sandt 2007
    Van-de-sandt-2010
    Van-de-sandt-2011
    Van De Sandt & Flusser 2002
    Van Deventer 2021
    Varner 2005
    Vatican II
    Veith1993
    Veith-1993
    Veith-sutton-2017
    Vikis-Freibergs 1997
    Visitation
    Voobus 1968
    Voobus 1969
    Warfield 1886
    Wasson & Toelken 1998
    Wednesday In Holy Week
    Wenham 1984
    Wenham 1992
    Weston-2009
    Wilson2011
    Wilson-2011
    Wilson20113470b5cf10
    Wolmarans 2005
    Wright 1984
    Young 2011
    Ysebaert-2002
    Zechariah
    Zephaniah

Proudly powered by Weebly