Wittenberg Door Campus Ministry
  • Home
  • Calendar
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Recording Archives
  • Resources
    • Bible Study - John's Gospel
    • Bible Study - Ephesians
    • Greek Tutorials
  • About
    • About Wittenberg CoMo
    • Support Us
    • Contact Us
  • Position Papers
  • Sandbox

Why God Reveals Mysteries

5/24/2023

0 Comments

 
5/24/23
Scholarly Reflections

Winger, Thomas M. "Intercession and Doxology: The Revelation of the Mystery Is for Their Strengthening and to God's Glory 3:14-21." Ephesians. St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 2014, 389-423.

Winger reminds his readers that in Ephesians 3:14 Paul takes up the sentence he had begun in 3:1 but interrupted (Winger 2014, 389). Paul is continuing to give praise to God because not only has he reconciled Jew and Gentile, but he has done it by the revelation of the mystery of redemption in Christ. Though Jews would normally stand while praying, here Paul bends his knee in reverence before God (Winger 2014, 390).

Ephesians 3:15, with its use of "family" derived from "father" in 3:14, ties the concept of the family to God. Winger observes that the identity of the Christian family is bound up with the realization of God as the father of all (Winger 2014, 391). When God gives his name to us we are part of His family.

Ephesians 3:16 goes on with the start of the content of Paul's prayer. Winger points out that in the conception of prayer found here, the strength of the prayer depends on God to whom we pray rather than on any quality of those who pray (Winger 2014, 392-393). The Holy Spirit, who is emphasized in Ephesians, is the agent of God for the strengthening and encouragement of the Christians. Winger also notes the Trinitarian emphasis in verses 14-19, with the Father on both ends of the prayer, the Spirig in verse 16, and Crhsit in verse 16 (Winger 2014, 394). Additionally, the prayer is that God would strengthen "the inner man" (v. 16)., a place which only God can reach. Change in the inner man is change of the whole of the person (Winger 2014, 394).

Ephesians 3:17 then prays that Christ would dwell in the hearts of the Ephesians. Winger notes a parallelism between the phrases with infinitives in verses 16 and 17 (Winger 2014, 394) while I note the start of a tricolon crescendo, with the statements becoming longer step by step. Though Winger does not explicitly deal with the crescendo, he does briefly note the fact that the second statement is expanded with two prepositional phrases.

Winger considers the petition of Ephesians 3:18 to be subordinated to the previous petitions (Winger 2014, 396). The goal ἵνα) is that the Ephesians may comprehend the enormity of God's salvation. They, with all Christians, have received baptism and are redeemed people of Christ (Winger 2014, 397). Winger observes that the reference to "width, length, height and depth" makes us ask, "of what?" However, Paul doesn't answer that question. Winger concludes based on other context that it probably refers to Christ's love (Winger 2014, 398). 

Ephesians 3:19 does draw a conclusion. Paul's prayer includes the Ephesians knowing the astounding love of Christ (Winger 2014, 398). Winger views Paul's use of language not merely as parallel. In verse 19 they should "comprehend" and in verse 19 they should "know." "Paul moves from intellectual apprehension to the deeper, experiential knowledge that is implied by γινώσκω" (Winger 2014, 399). Winger takes the next ἵνα clause, "that you may be filled," as "subordinate to the previous two ἵνα clauses and the clauses that modify them" (Winger 2014, 399). God fills the Ephesians by the Holy Spirit.

In Ephesians 3:20-21, Paul moves into a doxological statement. Winger observes here that Paul's doxologies fall into somewhat predictable verbal patterns (Winger 2014, 400). This one is no exception, as Winger illustrates with references to other doxologies. Of note is Paul's use of what I would characterize as a "pile" of characteristics, not showing much grammatical or logical progression, but rather emphasizing the overwhelming majesty of God. Winger notes the lack of a verb in verse 21. His interruption is that, though we are naturally likely to mentally supply a verb of being, it would be appropriate for that verb to express either that God possesses glory or that he should receive glory. The absence of the actual verb may suggest that both are the case (Winger 2014, 402).

Winger observes from a structural and rhetorical perspective that the prayer in Ephesians 3:14-21 has parallel elements to that of 1:15-23, but that while earlier it was Paul's own prayer, here he is speaking more as someone leading the Ephesians' prayer. It is more like a liturgical unit in this way (Winger 2014, 405). The prayer also divides into a section of intercession and one of doxology. Both elements are prayer. Winger outlines the structure of the prayer in considerable detail (Winger 2014, 405-406). He then notes that the prayer as a whole has a structure not unlike that of a collect, as used to this day. It begins with an address to God, a rationale based on God's character or work, a petition, a desired result of the petition, and a doxology (Winger 2014, 407).

Paul's prayer in Ephesians 3:14-21 is not a theoretical response to a theoretical revelation. Winger sees Paul as someone with a pastoral concern for the well being of the Ephesians (Winger 2014, 40-7). To this end, his desire is to direct them to God, rather than to the idea of the Gospel or to himself as an apostle. He shows this desire by stating the posture of kneeling before the Father (3:14) (Winger 2014, 408). Though it is not clear whether kneeling for prayer to God was considered normal in the early first century, it was by the end of the century. Winger cites numerous examples of kneeling as the custom for prayer among early Christians (Winger 2014, 409). He continues with a discussion of the history of kneeling not only for prayer but also when receiving communion (Winger 2014, 409ff).

Winger again observes the rich Trinitarian theology expressed in the prayer of Ephesians 3:14-17, where all the persons of the Godhead are present - the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit (Winger 2014, 413). Here, God is not only the Father in the Godhead, but of all creation. He has further created families to find their identity in him as their true father. As elsewhere, here also the Ephesians receive God in their inner selves, with a result which is external (Winger 2014, 414).

With this result in mind, Winger notes that Ephesians 3:18-19 speak of the magnitude of "Christ's love for us, not our love for him" (Winger 2014, 415). This is the means by which God has imparted the fulfillment of the mystery of his redemption to the Ephesians. 

The structure of the doxology in Ephesians 3:20-21 is relatively simple. Winger boils it down to an object of praise (God), a statement of praise or glory, an expression of eternity, and an amen (Winger 2014, 416). The rest of the doxology consists of illustrative statements which put meat on those bones. Winger identifies three basic forms of doxologies found in Scripture, and describes them in brief. He concludes that in all his doxologies Paul uses a pattern which can be identified elsewhere. "He does not invent his own worship, but receives and joins in the way his people were given to glorify God" (Winger 2014, 418). Winger then lays out a chart of Paul's doxologies throughout his writings, showing the rhetorical and pastoral use of each (Winger 2014, 418-419). Wnger rejects the idea that a doxology is necessarily a sign of transition from theological to ethical teaching (Winger 2014, 420). Doxologies may serve this function, but there are many other functions as well.

​
0 Comments

The Gospel as Mystery

5/23/2023

0 Comments

 
5/23/23
Scholarly Reflections

Winger, Thomas M. "The Mystery of Paul's Apostolic Mandate: The Gospel of Christ for the Gentiles 3:1-13." Ephesians. St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 2014, 352-388.

Ephesians 3:1 opens with a causal statement, "for this reason.' Winger questions what the antecedent reason is, and finds that the thought which consumed part or all of chapter two is interrupted logically by 3:1-13. The thought is then completed in verse 14 - God's reconciliation of Gentiles, Jews, and Himself is the reason which moves Paul to prayer (Winger 2014, 352). Meanwhile, he has digressed in 3:2-13.

In Ephesians 3:1 we read for the first time about Paul's state as a prisoner (Winger 2014, 353). Winger references Colossians 1:24 to describe Paul as continuing in Christ' sufferings. Rather than suffering pointlessly, Paul asserts that there is a benefit to the Gentiles found in his suffering (Winger 2014, 354).

In Ephesians 3:2, Winger takes Paul to be asserting that the Ephesians have certainly heard of God's grace given to Paul on behalf of the Ephesians (Winger 2014, 354). Winger takes the grace given to be the apostolic office which Paul then administers for the benefit of the Ephesians. The concept of the apostolic office as a grace appears three times in this pericope (Winger 2014, 355).

Ephesians 3:3 speaks of the mystery revealed to Paul. Winger considers this mystery to consist not only of the revelation of the Holy Spirit, but also what Paul has recognized through study of Scripture (Winger 2014, 356). Paul's realization is that God has provided salvation for Gentiles as well as Jews. 

Ephesias 3:4 is grammatically slightly opaque, with an unexpected prepositional phrase. Winger considers the thrust to be that of a need for reading the writings of Paul (and others) when assembled (Winger 2014, 357). This will assist the whole church in understanding the mystery of the Gospel. According to verse five, the mystery was not made known for other generations. Paul considers this a realization which was not available apart from the coming of Christ as the Messiah (Winger 2014, 359). It has especially been revealed "to His holy apostles and prophets." Winger observes that the word "now" indicates Paul is thinking not of Old Testament prophets, but of those in Paul's own time (Winger 2014, 360). 

Ephesians 3:6 points out that part and parcel of the mystery revealed is that the Gentiles share in blessings with the Jews. Winger describes implications of their being "fellow heirs . . . members of a body . . . (and) partakers" of salvation (Winger 2014, 362). Verse seven notes that Paul's role is as a "servant" of the Gospel. Winger notes that the term διάκονος doesn't indicate a particular type of concern, but merely the role as someone carrying out duties for someone else (Winger 2014, 363). The work of Paul is by God's appointment, as a gift given by grace. It was given to him by God's power, which Winger notes also makes Paul able to perform his work (Winger 2014, 365). 

In Ephesians 3:8, Paul refers to himself as the "least" of the holy ones. Winger notes that the term he uses literally says he is small, which is also the meaning of his name, Paulus, in Latin (Winger 2014, 365). He himself is not the focus. He is simply being obedient to Christ. His work, and his prayer for the Ephesians, in verse nine, is that the Lord would bring sight to all, particularly about this mystery of the Gospel. Winger connects this statement with Acts 26:18, where Paul was to be used to open people's eyes (Winger 2014, 367). Paul seems to have a fairly simple view of eschatology in this instance. The mystery was hidden before and is now revealed. Winger sees just two periods in Paul's conception of the history of the Gospel (Winger 2014, 368).

Ephesians 3:10 makes it clear that the spiritual forces seen as arrayed against the Ephesians (cf. 1:21) have been defeated and that God has overcome all (Winger 2014, 369). It is completed now, though chapter six emphasizes that there will be ongoing instances of strife until Christ comes again. This work is carried out "through the Church." Winger observes that Paul has just spoken of the importance of apostles and prophets. Therefore, he takes this statement to be instrumental in nature (Winger 2014, 370). God brings the Gospel of Christ by the hands of the apostles and prophets, delivering it to the world through the church. The church receives and transmits the gifts. Verse eleven again asserts that God's wisdom has not changed, but that the way it is understood has (Winger 2014, 371).

Ephesians 3:12 moves on to emphasize that we have been incorporated into Christ (Winger 2014, 372). This creates a confidence that we have access to God. Verse 13 then speaks to prayers not to lose heart. Winger notes that the person who should not lose heart is not stated. However, it is more characteristic for Paul to state a prayer for the Ephesians (you) than for himself (I) (Winger 2014, 373). Even in sufferings, Paul reminds the Ephesians that they possess God's glory (Winger 2014, 374).

From a rhetorical standpoint, Winger notes that in Ephesians 3:1-13, the revelation of God leads to a desire to thank him (Winger 2014, 375). The great prayer will come in 3:14-21. But meanwhile, verses 2-13 seem to be a digression. Winger suggests that we understand the first three chapters of Ephesians not as an extended prayer, but a cycle of "revelation-teaching-prayer-doxology" (Winger 2014, 376). Though there is a grammatical interruption at verse two, Winger does not find a digression in content. He considers the verses to be consistent with Paul's earlier statements and that they serve to close ideas Paul has opened earlier (Winger 2014, 377). 

From a structural standpoint, Winger finds Ephesians 3:1-13 less clearly structured than the earlier passages. However, there is still evidence of care in design. Winger notes the signs of inclusio which define both the boundaries and the purpose of the passage. Verses 5-6, in the center of the passage, state the central idea of God's mystery now revealed. The passage also contains two main sentences, one about revelation, the other about proclamation, corresponding to the main points of Paul's argument.

Paul brackets this passage with statements about being a prisoner, in Ephesians 3:1 and 13. Winger takes his status as a prisoner to be an element which could be used against him, to suggest his message is wrong (Winger 2014, 380). Paul's statements about the reliability of the Gospel point up that, rather than being imprisoned for any other cause, it is precisely the truth of the Gospel which is the offense to his enemies. Suffering was to be understood not in terms of failure, but as a mark of being a Christian. The end goal, being a partaker of the resurrection, remained in view.

When Paul emphasizes the nature of his apostolic office in Ephesians 3:2, Winger observes that the expectation of classical rhetoric would be that an author or speaker would establish his credibility through truth claims. Further, "the office of preacher could not be separated from the message itself" (Winger 2014, 382). Testimony to the resurrection was an integral part of the message. Through Paul's message to the Ephesians, he is saying they are bound to Christ as he is (Winger 2014, 383).

The mystery of Christ, then, becomes the topic of Ephesians 3:3-7 (Winger 2014, 383). Paul alleges that in the current age the mystery has been disclosed. One rightly asks what this new content could be. Winger notes a strong parallel between the vocabulary here and in Colossians 1:26-27. In colossians the mystery is the presence of Christ in the Colossians (Winger 2014, 384). The very presence of the Colossians or the Ephesians in the body of Christ is this mystery. Winger asks whether God really didn't reveal his plan to draw Gentiles into the kingdom in the Old Testament (Winger 2014, 385). Though there are many Old Testament statements about the inclusion of the Gentiles, the prophets were lacking an understanding of how God would accomplish it. This may serve as at least a partial explanation of what Paul had in mind. A more thorough explanation may be rooted in the fact that the means is specifically Christ's death and resurrection. This was not clearly revealed until it was completed by Christ (Winger 2014, 386).

The riches of Christ, in Ephesians 3:8-12, have not only been revealed to Paul, but have been delivered to the Ephesians. They have been made partakers in Christ (Winger 2014, 387). The mystery delivered is for the gentiles. God has made them heirs of His promise.

​
0 Comments

Reconciliation in Christ

5/15/2023

0 Comments

 
5/15/23
Scholarly Reflections

Winger, Thomas M. "Reconciled in One Body through the Cross 2:11-22." Ephesians. St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 2014, 309-351.

Winger finds a shift in emphasis starting at Ephesians 2:11. The presentation of the Gospel was general in nature through verse ten (Winger 2014, 310). The Ephesians are to remember the Gospel and the way Paul and they would live as part of their heritage in Christ. The past and present stand in sharp contrast (Winger 2014, 310). The Ephesians are no longer Gentiles "in the flesh." By saying this, Winger observes that circumcision and uncircumcision are not the defining characteristic that matters (Winger 2014, 311). The grace of God is received by grace, through faith. This is what defines the Ephesians. In Ephesians 2:12, they were alienated from Israel. Winger takes this to mean they were separated "from the privileges and way of life of God's chosen people under his covenant" (Winger 2014, 313). The citizenship to which Paul refers is not an earthly, localized right, but something eternal.

Winger observes that the term Paul uses for a "covenant" in Ephesians 2:12 is significant. Rather than a συνθήκη, which indicates a bilateral agreement, he uses the word διαθήκη, a unilateral declaration (Winger 2014, 314). God is the one who set the terms and conditions of the covenant. Ultimately he is the one who keeps the covenant. The covenant of God would then change the Ephesians from being people without hope. In Christ, they do have hope (Winger 2014, 314). 

The ground shift Winger observes in Ephesians 2:12 and following, then, is a shift from being "in the world" to being "in Christ" in verse 13 (Winger 2014, 315). The Ephesians who, as Gentiles, had been scattered and "far off"  now as Christians are "brought near."  Winger notes this was typical language used for conversion to Judaism, but here it is applied to conversion to Christ (Winger 2014, 316).

In Ephesians 2:14, Christ is described as "our peace." Winger notes this is repeated in verse 15, making a bracket around a central idea (Winger 2014, 317). He further notes that Paul associates Christ with "the God of peace," thus making a claim to Christ's divinity (Winger 2014, 318). Jesus' work of "breaking down every wall" may refer to several different impediments. Winger discusses evil forces (Winger 2014, 318), the curtain in the temple, God's law, and hostility of Jewish authorities (Winger 2014, 319).

Winger further notes the forceful nature of Ephesians 2:15. Here, all the Law is oppressive, breeding hostility (Winger 2014, 323). While God's Word, frequently translated as "law" is good, at this point Paul's classification of "the commands" excludes what Lutherans would understand as Gospel. He is here speaking of the demands of God's law, which we cannot keep. This is what Christ took care of, through the Gospel.

Verse 16 makes it clear that the work of Christ is to create unity, gathering different people and making them one, specifically in Christ (Winger 2014, 324). It is only through Christ that this can happen, and that one body is made only by means of Christ being crucified (Winger 2014, 325). 

In Ephesians 2:16 Winger takes the aorist participle ἀποκτείνας not to show temporality, but means, "by killing" (Winger 2014, 325). I question this and wish to investigate further. It would not be normal to use a nominative case to show means.

Verse 17 restates the work of Christ as making peace. Winger observes not only that the peace is both for people far and near, but that Paul makes allusions and near quotations of numerous Old Testament passages, applying them to Christ (Winger 2014, 326-327). In Christ Jew and Gentile are together reconciled. Winger particularly notes that in Ephesians 2:18 this is "through him" (Christ), "in one spirit" (the Holy Spirit), "with the Father," a clear Trinitarian statement (Winger 2014, 327). The theme returns in Ephesians 4:1-6.

Ephesians 2:19 returns to the concept of the Ephesian Gentile unbelievers as strangers. They are no longer in their former condition, alienated from God (Winger 2014, 328). Winger speaks to the fact that the Ephesians are counted on an equal footing with all the Christians.

Winger observes that in Ephesians 2:20, the reference to the Christians being built on "the apostles and prophets" seems to be in conflict with Paul's normal emphasis on Christ alone. Here Paul sees Christ and the church as incorporated in building God's temple (Winger 2014, 331). Paul frequently includes teachings which include the apostles as a part of God's work, not only here in Ephesians, but also elsewhere in his letters. Specifically, here, Christ is the cornerstone, which determines the level and direction of the rest of the building. The apostles and prophets, as other parts of the foundation, are dependent on his governance (Winger 2014, 334).

Paul's emphasis in verse 21 is that the entire church is one entity, joined together as a coherent whole (Winger 2014, 336). Winger notes that it grows, not necessarily in number, but in some vital aspect as one organism. He takes this to be a growth in many facets, mentioned in other Scriptures, in its appearance in the world (Winger 2014, 337). Of critical importance to Paul is the fact that in Ephesians 2:22, the Ephesian gentiles have been incorporated in God's building.

Winger finds the divisions in Ephesians, particularly in chapter two, to be very clear-cut. There are distinctive markers of change of topic at each of the modern chapter divisions. Further, there is a clear contrast at Ephesians 2:1 and another at 2:11, suggesting that verses 1-10 go together as one unit. Verses 11 and following shift from a distinction of Jew and Gentile to a distinction between "then" and "now" (Winger 2014, 339). Winger notes that Ephesians 2:11-22 also form a chiastic structure, based on the concepts of "then" and "now" (Winger 2014, 341). The central thought is that of God making peace through the unity found in reconciliation. 

In terms of the rhetorical structure of Ephesians, Winger takes 2:11-22 to be "the second major proof for Paul's contention that we are baptismally united in Christ (Winger 2014, 343). The fact of Christ's passion has a natural result, which is unity. Here Winger acknowledges a distinction between his understanding and that of scholars who view chapters 4-6 as exhortation to live out a new life in light of what Christ has done in chapters 1-3.

The division between Jews and Gentiles was addressed by Paul in the Berakah prayer of Ephesians 1:3-14. In 2:11-22 he returns to the theme of God's work to break down division (Winger 2014, 343). Because God has united people to himself, their divisions have naturally been broken down. God's relationship with Israel, as his special covenant people, has not ended (Winger 2014, 345). However, the same relationship has been extended to all nations in Christ. They no longer live as hopeless people (Winger 2014, 346). The division of 2:14 may well represent not only the divide between God and man, but also that between hopelessness and hope. 

​
0 Comments

Alive Together - Ephesians 2:1-10

5/5/2023

0 Comments

 
5/5/23
Scholarly Reflections

Winger, Thomas M. "Made Alive Together in Christ 2:1-10." Ephesians. St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 2014, 279-308.

Winger comments on the suspense created in Ephesians chapter two, where Paul begins by describing "you," the direct object of the sentence (Winger 2014, 279). He distinguishes between you (Gentiles) and we (Jews) in verse three. Then in verse four he presents God as the subject and continues with the main verbs of the sentence (Winger 2014, 280).

Paul's description of the Ephesians as dead before Christ gave them life is unqualified. They were dead in an entirely literal manner, as Paul would describe them (Winger 2014, 280). Winger notes this leaves no room for any type of Pelagian thought. He ties this thought to Romans 6 and Colossians 2, where it is baptism which brings life from death. Winger therefore considers the passage in Ephesians 2 to identify baptism as the start of walking with God (Winger 2014, 282). A key element to Paul is the shift from walking according to the authority of evil spirits and to walking according to God in Christ (Winger 2014, 283).

Ephesians 2:2-3 speaks plainly of the hopeless state of the Ephesians as dead without Christ, but that the spirit of God moves in them to bring them life. Verse three identifies the Ephesian Gentiles with Paul and the Jewish Christians, who also were without hope (Winger 2014, 283). The root of the condition was identical. Both groups were united by sin before they became united by Christ (Winger 2014, 284). The life in sin was driven by sinful desires which pushed us toward our unbelieving goals. Winger observes the language of "flesh" and how it could be related to a distinction of what unifies us. With that in mind he briefly speaks sacramentally about baptism leading to desiring the flesh of Christ in the eucharist (Winger 2014, 284-285). All this, in verse four, is a result of God's love which moves him to mercy (Winger 2014, 286-287).

The theme of unity returns in Ephesians 2:5, where Winger observes there are three compound verbs which use the prepositional prefix "with" (Winger 2014, 28). Unity will remain a major theme throughout Ephesians.

Winger proposes a chiastic structure for Ephesians 2:1-10. The mid-point, in 2:5, is "by grace you have been saved" (Winger 2014, 288). Winger further thinks this statement may be a brief liturgical quotation, as a doxological statement at the focal point of the chiasm.

Walking back through the steps of the chiasm, Winger notes the quick return of the "with" verb, here sitting down with Christ (Winger 2014, 289). This takes place in the heavenly places, an expression of Jesus' power. Winger does point out that Jesus doesn't have a restricted local dwelling, but that his heavenly throne serves as a sign of power. Verse seven states a purpose of Christ's work, that he can show his overwhelming grace (Winger 2014, 290). His show of grace entails the salvation of the Ephesians, the major topic of verses 8-9. Paul emphasizes that the salvation was completed in the past and remains a reality in the present (Winger 2014, 291). 

Winger discusses "by grace through faith" as he considers whose faith the passage might refer to. He considers it not to be Christ's faith, but rather, "it is fides qua creditur, subjective faith. The preposition διά subtly distinguishes the role of the Christian's faith from God's grace. While grace is the efficient cause, faith is merely the receiving instrument of the gift of salvation" (Winger 2014, 292). When the passage goes on to say, "this is not from yourselves," Winger notes that some commentators have understood the antecedent of "this" to be "faith." However, the gender difference makes this unlikely. Winger takes the neuter "this" as a reference to the entire clause which immediately precedes it (Winger 2014, 293).

Paul is quite emphatic in Ephesians 2:9 that grace is different from works. Being saved by grace is diametrically opposed to being saved by works (Winger 2014, 293). Winger sees Paul as clear that it is only God's works which save, not ours. The theme continues with forceful statements into verse ten. Good works, rather than bringing salvation, are the result of salvation (Winger 2014, 296).

Winger continues to emphasize the combination of eloquent expression and artful structure in Ephesians chapter two. Here Paul has not only used three clear sentences with a strong logical flow, but he has created a chiasm of ten verses, drawing the reader's focus to the grace of God. Winger provides a chart of the structure and then discusses the elements in turn (Winger 2014, 297-298). The plight described is all of man's making, while the rescue is entirely the work of God.

The overall motion of Ephesians 2:1-10 is from death to life. Winger notes the parallel to Jesus' death and resurrection. The blessing of the Christian is a resurrection, but not only in the future. Paul sees the Ephesians as experiencing the life of resurrection already (Winger 2014, 300). Winger notes that Paul uses the image of death in three different ways, which must be distinguished by context. There is the deadness of sin apart from Christ. There is also the putting to death of the old life in baptism. Third, in living the baptismal life, the old life is being put to death (Winger 2014, 301). Likewise, resurrection has a present element and an eschatological element (Winger 2014, 302-303).

Winger finally reflects on the Ephesians' unity with each other and their exaltation with Christ. He finds that this unity comes from the fact that the Christians are partakers of baptism (Winger 2014, 304ff). They have received the Gospel and have been cleansed from sin. Their unity with one another is significant, but Paul sees their unity with Christ as the important point of salvation (Winger 2014, 305). The present serves as a foretaste of what is to come.

​
0 Comments

Ephesians 1:15-23

4/28/2023

0 Comments

 
4/28/23
Scholarly Notes


Winger, Thomas M. "Exordium: Hodayah Prayer: Thanksgiving: 1:15-23." Ephesians. St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 2014, 234-276.

Following his normal pattern, after Winger gives a translation of Ephesians 1:15-23, he proceeds to analyze textual matters (Winger 2014, 234ff) before making his general commentary.

The transition, "for this reason," is slightly oblique. It doesn't clearly refer back to any one reason. Winger leaves it uncertain whether it refers to the baptismal state or is merely a rhetorical transition (Winger 2014, 234). Verse 15 further states that Paul has heard about the Ephesians' faith. This doesn't indicate that he would have no first-hand knowledge, but that he has been brought up to date with a report (Winger 2014, 235). The Christian faith is theirs. They are rooted in Christ, evidenced by love. Winger observes that the "in Christ" is not the normal object for "believing." Rather, he views "in Christ" "as the location of the believers" (Winger 2014, 236).

Paul's response to the Ephesians' love for all is to give thanks, a habitual activity (Winger 2014, 237). Winger notes the theological nature of "remembrance," which is not merely knowledge, but indicates thought with care or concern. Paul's remembering of the Ephesians is a matter of his care for them.

In Ephesians 1:17, Paul's prayers for the Ephesians are described. He prays the God who gives glory would give His Holy Spirit, related to wisdom, revelation, and knowledge, all related to God's presence (Winger 2014, 239). In verse 18 the entire idea is summed up as an enlightening of the eyes which the Ephesians should receive (Winger 2014, 240). The reality of this enlightenment is the hope which the Ephesians have in Christ. Winger notes the thematic use of "hope" in Ephesians (Winger 2014, 241). It is a confidence we have in Christ. Paul ties the hope of the Ephesians to a wealth (a word only in Ephesians in the New Testament) of God's glory (Winger 2014, 242). The impression is of a great gift which cannot be exhausted. Yet Winger notes the implications of the pronouns in verse 19, "his" and "to us" are that God is personally granting a gift based on his limitless power and that it is to all of us, Jew and Gentile (Winger 2014, 243). Paul's description of God's power appears to Winger very much like a liturgical doxology.

Ephesians 1:20 begins with a relative pronoun referring back to verse 19, then a cognate verb. For this reason, Winger takes the clause to be a continuation of the same sentence, counter to the NA27 edition (Winger 2014, 244). The emphasis here remains on the power of God which He uses according to His grace. By God's power, Winger notes, God raised Christ from the dead, seated him in a position of authority (v. 20), made all things subject to him, and placed him as head of the church (v. 22) (Winger 2014, 244). Christ is therefore seen as the one who has all power and authority (v. 21). Winger discusses the significance of Jesus being placed above all names at some length. He observes that while magical texts attempt to claim authority through the use of a name, the name of God is not subject to domination. His name has sovereign power (Winger 2014, 247-248). Winger finds that in Ephesians Paul is emphasizing the present reality of Jesus' effectual exaltation. This contrasts with the view in 1 Corinthians 15, where we look to a future fulfillment of the work of Christ (Winger 2014, 248-249). In verse 22 the work of Christ is completed and his reign has begun.

The reign of Christ is not only over all creation, but particularly for the Church, His body (vv. 22-23). Winger notes that Paul here emphasizes the unity of a body, rather than the diversity of its parts (Winger 2014, 250). There is a unity created in the "filling" which happens as a result of the presence of Christ with the Church.

Winger notes that immediately after the longest sentence in the New Testament, the second longest sentence, at 169 words, starts in Ephesians 1:15 (Winger 2014, 252). It serves as a formal thanksgiving, which seems redundant, since Paul has already given a Berakah prayer. Winger sees this as possibly a liturgical element, essentially with a wo-fold prayer (Winger 2014, 254). After detailing some of the normal features of an epistolary thanksgiving, Winger notes that Paul uses the form but is free to alter  the details according to his desires (Winger 2014, 256). The thanksgiving in Ephesians is evidence of his erudition and flexibility. 

In good epistolary style, the thanksgiving serves "to exercise the personal relationship that was strained by absence" (Winger 2014, 257). Winger finds this as a significant element in Ephesians 1:15-23. Paul's thanksgiving is aimed at strengthening his relationship with the whole congregation.

From a liturgical standpoint, Winger notes that Paul uses multiple thanksgivings in several of his letters. This is consistent with evidence of Jewish and early Christian practices of having multiple different prayers, one after another (Winger 2014, 259). Here there is a general thanksgiving followed by supplication for particular needs. The locus of God's power to supply the needs of the Ephesians is not in creation but in Christ's resurrection (Winger 2014, 260). This results in a hymn of praise in verses 20-23. Winger observes that scholars have not found a source for this hymn, and that it may be of Paul's own composition (Winger 2014, 261).

From a rhetorical standpoint, Ephesians 1:15-23 serves as a proem, introducing key elements and seeking to gain favor from the listeners. Winger provides a list of the many elements which appear in the passage and will arise again later (Winger 2014, 262-263). 

Three major themes appear in Ephesians 1:18-23, which will play out throughout Ephesians. In verse 18, Paul prays that God will bring light to the eyes of the Ephesians' heart (Winger 2014, 264). The theme of enlightenment is frequently used in patristic literature for those who are being baptized. That will serve as a foundation for our understanding. Second, the ascension of Christ is featured in verses 20-23 (Winger 2014, 265). This draws Winger into an extended discussion of Luther and the nature of Jesus' physical presence in the resurrection. He returns to the Ephesians as he observes that Christ's victory rescues them from demonic forces and the gods of paganism (Winger 2014, 268). Third, Christ is presented in verses 22-23 as the head, and the church as Christ's body (Winger 2014, 269). Winger notes the importance in Paul's thought of God being one and the Church being one. This is not one head with many bodies, but one head and one body (Winger 2014, 270). Here the body is one unit, while elsewhere it is seen as consisting of many members. The emphasis in Ephesians is on the unity of the body. Winger describes the philosophical precept of a head and body as a social structure familiar to Greek philosophy as well as Judaism (Winger 2014, 271ff). Though Winger explores the issue at length, he has no conclusive reason for Paul's choice of the image of head and body rather than some other arrangement. Yet we are left with this to build upon as we understand Christ and the Church. 


​
0 Comments

Ephesians 1:3-14

4/27/2023

0 Comments

 
4/27/23
Scholarly Notes


Winger, Thomas M. "Proem: Berakah Prayer: Election and Unity in Christ: 1:3-14." Ephesians. St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 2014, 182-233.

After providing a translation of Ephesians 1:3-14, Winger moves immediately into notes about the words and phrases used in the passage (Winger 2014, 182). The term used for "blessed" is generally used to describe the blessed state of God as opposed to that of humans. The identification of "the God and father of our Lord Jesus Christ" is commonly enough in use that Winger takes it as a liturgical formula (Winger 2014, 183). Winger notes particularly that the Father is Jesus' God and ours as well. The saving action, God's blessing in verse three, is a typical feature of the Berakah prayer. Winger notes that God is the subject of almost all verbs in 1:3-14 (Winger 2014, 183). He is the one on display. The reference to God being "in the heavenlies" suggests to Winger that Paul wants the Ephesians to view God as the one who exercises dominion over all (Winger 2014, 184). This rule of God extends to the Ephesian Christians. Winger observes it is not deferred until later, but in Ephesians 2:6 is the possession of the Ephesians already (Winger 2014, 185). Further, central to the argument of Ephesians, it is "in Christ," a phrase which appears nine times in Ephesians, plus four more times with a definite article. This emphasizes that our identity is wrapped up in the person of Jesus, the one who exercises God's dominion (Winger 2014, 186). 

Ephesians 1:4 moves on to describe the way God has blessed his people in Christ (Winger 2014, 187). God's act of choosing his people speaks to his merciful initiative. Winger sees the language of choosing as really God's words at the Transfiguration, which may recall Jesus' baptism. At that time, Jesus is called the "beloved," a term Paul uses in Ephesians 1:6 (Winger 2014, 187). This leads Winger to understand Paul's emphasis to be on the choice of God revealed as we receive baptism. This is the means by which the Church as a whole, and individual Christians, are presented as "holy and blameless." Christ, the holy and blameless one, chose us to be like himself (Winger 2014, 189). It is important that we understand this holiness "before him," a position used in the NewTestament and early Christian literature only of standing before God. It is in His sight we are declared holy. Our appearance to others does not actually matter.

Ephesians 1:4 specifies "in love." Winger questions whether it modifies what precedes or follows it (Winger 2014, 190). He also questions whether the phrase refers to God's love or our love. Though it is a bit unusual to begin a thought with a prepositional phrase, Winger notes it is done twice before aorist participles in verse 13. Here, he  thinks it forms an inclusio of verses 4c-6, and that it refers to God's love, not ours.

Ephesians 1:5 then goes on to speak of the way God has chosen us. We have been selected for adoption as a son. Winger understands this adoption to be foreshadowed in Israel's adoption by God. Through baptism we are made sons of God (Winger 2014, 191). This, again, is only through Christ.

Ephesians 1:6 makes the first of three statements in the prayer, "to the praise of (His) glory." Winger notes this as a typical element in the Berakah prayer, but that Paul, using it three times, makes the prayer specifically Trinitarian in nature (Winger 2014, 192-193). Winger notes the similar threefold doxologies in the eucharistic prayers of the Didache.

Winger makes a further stylistic observation at this point. In Ephesians Paul tends to make what may best be described as piles of genitives. The antecedent subject is not always clear, nor the specific genitive function. They seem to be used for emphasis, as is Paul's use of multiple cognate words (blessing with which He blesses us…) (Winger 2014, 193) This is peculiar to Ephesians.

Ephesians 1:7 introduces what we have - redemption as the blessing of God (Winger 2014, 195). Winger observes that this Christological center of the prayer consists of verses 7-12. All of it points explicitly to Christ. The emphasis here, with the present tense "we have" is on Christ's redemption now, rather than at some indefinite time in the future. The blood of Christ, and thus redemption, is present here and now. It works forgiveness. Winger observes the connection between Christ's blood, forgiveness, and the Lord's Supper (Winger 2014, 196).

Winger notes that in Ephesians 1:8 the magnitude of the gift of God's grace is limited not by the receiver, but by the giver who pours it out like a "thundering waterfall" which we may try to catch in a pitcher (Winger 2014, 197). Again, baptismal imagery is present with the idea of pouring. Here' the wisdom and understanding given by God make Him known to us (Winger 2014, 198).

Winger questions whether Ephesians 1:9-10 might be Paul's overall thesis statement. He hesitates in this because it is in a prayer so would not be expected as a logical thesis statement (Winger 2014, 198). The thrust is that the Ephesians should know the mystery of Christ in them. Winger observes the use of "mystery" and its Latin translation, "sacramentum" here, but considers it anachronistic to say Paul is referring to baptism and communion as the "mystery" (Winger 2014, 199). Regardless, it is by God's good pleasure that he has redeemed his people, that they believe, and have been baptized into Christ (Winger 2014, 200). The grand plan of God, in verse 10, has to do with his administration of a planned time, a fulfillment. Winger finds the focus in the summing up of all things in Christ (Winger 2014, 201). Again, Winger emphasizes that the summation is possible because of reconciliation in Christ.

Ephesians 1:11 speaks of God's selection of his people, using terminology of casting lots. Winger is clear that, though we would consider the process a matter of random chance, the opinion in antiquity, and certainly in Paul's world, was that by casting lots, God would take our preference out of the decision and choose according to his will (Winger 2014, 202). Of significance is the fact that God chose the Ephesians. It is important to Paul's argument that God's choice was a matter of foreordination (Winger 2014, 203). The Ephesian Christians were recognized in baptism, but had been chosen by God according to His purpose from all eternity. In verse 12, the goal is that the Ephesians would be to the praise of God's glory. 

The concept of some "who hoped before in Christ" appears in Ephesians 1:12. Winger asks what the "before" could refer to (Winger 2014, 204). He concludes that, though it is not entirely clear from a grammatical standpoint, the verb probably refers to Jews hearing of a Christ before the Gentiles did. Verse 13 continues the thought, by bringing in "you," i.e., the Ephesian Gentiles (Winger 2014, 205). They have also been sealed, set apart, as God's people.

How does this salvation happen? Winger notes that in verse 13 the Gospel brings salvation, and it is received by hearing, which, biblically speaking, is accompanied by faith (Winger 2014, 206). Hearing the Gospe=l, then, results not only in baptism and a giving of the Holy Spirit, but also an identifying seal for an eternal inheritance. This is the enormous good news received by the Ephesians (Winger 2014, 207). In response to the news of inheritance, the third doxology is present, but with a slight change in rhythm, signaling the end of the series (Winger 2014, 209). 

Having discussed vocabulary and grammar, Winger turns to the structure and rhetoric of Ephesians 1:3-14 (Winger 2014, 210ff). Winger considers the very long (204 word) sentence of Ephesians 1:3-14 to be not only evidence of an interest in rhetoric among Ephesians, but also as evidence of a particular, elevated liturgical style (Winger 2014, 210). The periodic formation interferes with haste and utility.

The prayer of Ephesians 1:3-14 is typical of Paul's letters, and fits the pattern of a Jewish Berakah prayer (Winger 2014, 211). It speaks of God and his mighty acts in the third person, then makes no petitions. The focus is on God rather than any human audience. Winger gives numerous examples of Berakoth. In particular, Winger adduces the eucharistic prayer of Didache 9, which is clearly a Berakah (Winger 2014, 213-214).

Winger is hesitant to assign a clear and definitive structure to the Berakah in Ephesians 1 (Winger 2014, 216). It is clearly rhythmic in nature, but not clearly conforming to a known meter. It may be divided into three portions, though most schemes don't divide it very evenly. However, Winger, following John Coutts, finds a Trinitarian pattern to be plausible (Winger 2014, 217). Verses 4-6 refer to the Father, 7-12 focus on the Son, and 13-14 refer to the Spirit. The refrain "to the praise of his (gracious) glory" serves both as praise to God and also to mark the segments of the prayer (Winger 2014, 219).

Rhetorically, theBerakah prayer of Ephesians 1:3-14 serves as a prologue. Winger notes the proem would normally provide "a narratio of the history thus far and perhaps a thesis statement" (Winger 2014, 220)/ The themes of being "in Christ" and of baptism are fairly clear. However, Winger finds a mention of no less than 13 additional concepts in these 12 verses, all of which are developed later in Ephesians (Winger 2014, 221).

Winger hesitates to say the baptism of Christ is strongly present in Ephesians 1:3-14. However, there are several verbal similarities to the Gospel accounts and to other baptismal themes (Winger 2014, 222). These strongly suggest that Paul is thinking of Christ's baptism. Winger discusses in some detail the allusive nature of liturgical statements about baptism, and especially Christ's baptism to "fulfill righteousness" (Winger 2014, 223-226). However we interpret it, though, Winger is clear that in Ephesians 1:13 baptism is what unites Christians in one body (Winger 2014, 226).

Predestination and Election are prominent features in Ephesians 1:3-14. Winger notes its use in the Formula of Concord, article 11 (Winger 2014, 227). God does not predestine evil, but the choosing of people to His kingdom. The emphasis in Ephesians 1 is that God called and you who believe came and saw you were chosen. This is an act of God's love.

Finally, the Ephesians have been sealed with the Holy Spirit (Winger 2014, 228ff). Winger sees the sealing as a mark of God's ownership and, therefore, of his protection (Winger 2014, 229). Winger provides a number of biblical examples of people being identified by a seal of some sort. Again, Winger sees baptism as the seal the Ephesians received (Winger 2014, 232). 

​
0 Comments

Ephesians 1:1-2

4/26/2023

0 Comments

 
4/26/23
Scholarly Notes


Winger, Thomas M. "Epistolary Salutation: 1:1-2." Ephesians. St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 2014, 167-181.

Winger treats Ephesians 1:1-2 as a salutation. Of note to him is the innovative use Christians made of the noun apostolos, as in earlier usage it would not regularly refer to the person placed in a position of authority (Winger 2014, 167). Within Jewish thought the concept of a messenger sent with authority was relatively common. By the claim to apostolic authority Paul ties himself to Christ. He does not act on his own, but on the authority of Jesus, who is able to do all things (Winger 2014, 168).

Winger discusses the clause, τοῖς ἁγίοις οὖσιν ἐν Ἐφέσῳ καὶ ποστοῖς ἐν Χρθστῷ Ἰησοῦ in some detail (Winger 2014, 169). While his diagram of the grammatical elements fails to demonstrate a clear structural parallelism, a count of syllables does sort the clause into two groups of eight syllables, dividing conceptually at καὶ. The text also sorts into dactyls and spondees, which would break down if τοῖς οὖσιν were absent. The exception to the pattern is the movable nu which prevents the expected elision. Additionally not only are there two groups of eight syllabus, but they make up eight feet. The ictus, sadly, is in the fifth food, not the fourth.

Winger creates possible rearrangements of the wording, which does, incidentally, retain the scansion. However, the revisions could lead to incorrect assumptions about the recipients (Winger 2014, 170-171).

Winger makes a point to associate the holiness of the Ephesians with their association "in Christ" (Winger 2014, 172). He observes that ἅγιος is used more frequently in Ephesians than anywhere else in the New Testament. Paul's address in this manner specifically to Gentiles makes a radical statement about their identity in Christ, which makes them just as holy as Jews.

In Ephesians 1:2, Paul greets the Ephesians. Winger observes that ten of his thirteen letters use the exact same wording: "grace to you and peace" (Winger 2014, 173). Terms of grace and peace quickly became standard in greetings of Christian letters. Winger notes that Paul carefully denotes the source of grace and peace (Winger 2014, 174). The identity of the one God, here with two persons (Father and Son) represented, is important to Christian teaching of Christology and the source of our hope.

From a rhetorical and epistolary standpoint, Winger observes that the introduction is on the inside of the scroll. It does not function as a title but serves to begin the conversation (Winger 2014, 175). It states the relationships of the author, the recipients, and, for that matter, God. Here Winger notes there is no co-author. Ephesians is presented as a letter specifically from Paul. Winger sees this as a move on Paul's part to speak clearly as the former pastor in Ephesus (Winger 2014, 176). 

Winger closes this section of his commentary by observing that the claim to apostleship found in the New Testament departed from its use in secular literature. The apostles are understood as those sent by God, with God's message, carrying out their work using God's authority (Winger 2014, 179). They expect God's presence is with them. Winger does note that, "When 'apostle' is used in this narrow sense, the number is usually twelve" (Winger 2014, 180). The move in Acts 1:15-26 was to restore the number of apostles to twelve. The role of eyewitness testimony was very important in early Christianity. Paul's self-identification as an apostle is interesting, as we don't have evidence that Paul was present as an eyewitness. He affirms the importance of apostleship, and the way God speaks "through the Son to his church through the mouth of the prophets and apostles" (Winger 2014, 181). Paul is passing on God's Word to the Ephesians as an apostle.

​
0 Comments

Structure and Rhetoric of Ephesians

4/10/2023

0 Comments

 
4/10/23
Scholarly Notes


Winger, Thomas M. "Introduction: Structure and Rhetoric." Ephesians. St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 2014, 148-163.

Winger provides a brief format of standard epistolary structure at the time of Paul (Winger 2014, 148-149). Paul's letter to the Ephesians, along with his other letters, follow the standard style rather closely. Paul's thanksgiving and prayers for the recipients, found in the introduction, tend to be more theologically oriented and elaborate than those of the average writer. Winger notes that Ephesians contains both a Berakah prayer (1:3-14) according to a traditional Jewish model, and also a normal thanksgiving (1:15-23) (Winger 2014, 149).

The conclusion of Paul's letters normally follows a pattern as well, with a request for prayer, a commendation of the one who is to deliver the letter, a greeting of peace, and a message of grace and fellowship. These elements, again, are relatively common elements, especially in Christian letters (Winger 2014, 150).

The body of the letter, found between the greeting and conclusion, is also according to a fairly standard period structure, but Paul has customized it to fulfill his epistolary purposes. He devotes the first portion of the body to what Winger describes as "doctrinal," "kerygmatic," or "indicative." He describes the doctrinal view he has in mind. In the second portion, he provides what Winger describes as "ethical," "didactic," or "imperative." He tells the recipients how to live (Winger 2014, 1521). There is normally a substantial doxology at the end of the first section. Winger does observe that the placement and use of doxologies, and even the broad categories of the material in the pattern is not necessarily reflective of the intricate ways Paul approaches his material (Winger 2014, 152).

From a rhetorical standpoint, Winger takes all of Paul's epistles to fit the category of a "sermon" or a "liturgical proclamation" (Winger 2014, 153). The message is intended as a persuasive argument to be delivered orally, though by reading aloud as opposed to being a speech delivered by the author. Winger provides a brief summary of the steps any author, including Paul, would go through in the process of developing a clear case (Winger 2014, 154ff). He suggests that, for the most part, Ephesians fits a pattern of epideictic rhetoric, "appealing to the crowd to hold or reaffirm a point of view" (Winger 2014, 156). Chapters 1-3 fit this pattern well, though chapters 4-6 may move to a more deliberative mode, urging future action. However, at some point, Winger observes, the categorization breaks down, especially as we consider that the Gospel is primarily a matter of proclamation as opposed to prescription of behaviors (Winger 2014, 157). The overall structure of Ephesians consists of an exordium and narratio, in which Paul lays out the essential arguments, using some typical Jewish patterns (Winger 2014, 150). All the arguments in Ephesians are related to the unity the body of Christ has in relation to the baptismal life. He then moves into an argumentio, which provides proofs of unity and refutations of the efficacy of the old, unregenerate lifestyle (Winger 2014, 160). He then moves to his peroratio, a conclusion of his argumentation (Winger 2014, 161). The conclusion he makes is that as the Christians put on the armor of God they are equipped to live the baptismal life of unity in Christ.

​
0 Comments

Purpose and Themes of Ephesians

4/7/2023

0 Comments

 
4/7/23
Scholarly Notes


Winger, Thomas M. "Introduction: Purpose and Themes." Ephesians. St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 2014, 138-148.

Winger observes that among commentators, most, especially those who take Ephesians as a circular letter, also miss elements of pragmatic purposes which Winger finds clearly present (Winger 2014, 138-139). Specifically, Winger finds a strong emphasis on rejecting false teachers, though the letter does not mention any specific false teachers (Winger 2014, 139). The theme of false teaching is present in Acts 18-20. It does not seem to Winger that this was a warning about a hypothetical situation which could some day arise. It is rather a present threat. Winger identifies the teaching as a syncretistic faith in which Judaism and Gnosticism were combined with Christianity (Winger 2014, 140). The faith in Jesus was easily replaced by a faith in knowledge.

Winger sees the distinction between "us" and "you" in Ephesians as quite important (Winger 2014, 141). While this may simply signify a difference between newer and older converts, Winger takes the intended contrast to be that of Jewish Chrsitians and Gentile Christians. This distinction is made relatively clear in Ephesians 2:11-12, where "you" refers to gentiles (Winger 2014, 142). The strong warning is to not return to a futile life, but to remain in Christ.

Baptism, in Ephesians, serves as the theme which unifies all the works of God in His church (Winger 2014, 144). Winger sees this as a sacrament which is intended to create unity. Winger sees baptism as the premise on which all the work of Christ in believers is done, described in Ephesians 1:13-14 (Winger 2014, 145). Winger notes that authors in antiquity were typically willing to admit baptism as a central theme, while modern commentators are less so (Winger 2014, 145).

Winger notes briefly that ecclesiology, christology, love and marriage provide us with categories for most of the distinctives of Ephesians aside from the Jew/Gentile relationships and the baptismal life (Winger 2014, 147). The letter describes all our baptismal relationships happening in the context of the Church.

​
0 Comments

Ephesians and Colossians

4/6/2023

0 Comments

 
4/6/23
Scholarly Notes


Winger, Thomas M. "Introduction: Relationship to Colossians." Ephesians. St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 2014, 130-138.

Ephesians and Colossians are easily considered as twin epistles, with a common origin, messenger, and concepts (Winger 2014, 130). Winger observes that the marginalia of the Nestle-Aland Greek New Testament do point up the parallel verses and concepts (Winger 2014, 131).

Winger points out some of the passages in which strong parallels appear (Winger 2014, 131-133). He finds the word choice and grammatical differences between the two writings interesting, considering that there are signs of careful and purposeful thought about nuanced differences in the two communities (Winger 2014, 133).

Winger further finds that the places where themes appear in both letters are not presented in the same order. The thematic arrangement is different in each letter. Again, he sees this as a very purposeful decision (Winger 2014, 134).

Winger provides a catalog list of material which is common to both letters, unique to Colossians, and unique to Ephesians (Winger 2014, 135). The common material does remind us that the churches were in proximity to one another, likely facing similar challenges. The unique material acknowledges that the communities were not identical.

The differences in material, organization, and length suggest that Colossians may have been written first, and that Ephesians is a version customized to the specific needs in Ephesus (Winger 2014, 136). Winger describes the pre-Gutenberg composition process, which includes extensive mental arrangement then dictation of a letter. This explains many of the featured differences in the texts of the two letters (Winger 2014, 137). 

​
0 Comments

Location and Date of Ephesians

4/5/2023

0 Comments

 
4/5/23
Scholarly Notes


Winger, Thomas M. "Introduction: Location and Date of Writing." Ephesians. St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 2014, 122-130.

In Ephesians 6:20, Paul states that he is a prisoner. Winger briefly discusses the significance of the imprisonment of an ambassador. Though all creation recognizes the Creator, the earthly kingdoms may not, and feel free to mistreat God's ambassadors (Winger 2014, 122). Winger observes that five letters of Paul are identified as Prison Epistles: Ephesians, Colossians, Philemon, Philippians, and 2 Timothy. "The first three are united, first, by geographical proximity of their destinations in the Lycus-Meander Valley and, second, by their letter carrier" (Winger 2014, 122). Colossians and Philemon both mention Archippus and Epaphras, along with Tychicus, who accompanies Onesimus to Philemon. Paul tells Timothy (2 Tim. 4:12) that he sent Tychicus to Ephesus. Winger takes this as a reference to the delivery of letters, including Ephesians (Winger 2014, 123).

Winger finds strong arguments that Paul's imprisonment while writing the Prison Epistles was in Rome. By the 4th Century, major manuscripts add that the letter is "from Rome" (Winger 2014, 123). Paul's relative freedom described in Acts 28 would have allowed for letter writing as well as receiving and sending people.

There is some speculation that Paul was actually imprisoned in Ephesus at the time of writing (Winger 2014, 124). Though this is possible, Winger doubts whether Onesimus could have hoped to disappear in Ephesus. Mark and Luke are also not known to have been with Paul at Ephesus (Winger 2014, 125). 

Paul was known to be imprisoned in Caesarea for two years (Winger 2014, 125). There may be reasonable chances that Onesimus would flee there. The imprisonment in Caesarea apparently involved some level of freedom (Winger 2014, 126). Paul's desire (Philemon 23) to visit Philemon on the way to Rome and Spain makes geographical sense. Further, some of the claims which led to Paul's imprisonment in Caesarea stemmed from conflicts in Ephesus, which had followed him to Caesarea. This could reasonably spur an encouraging and clarifying letter from Paul to Ephesus (Winger 2014, 127). Caesarea, at the time, like Ephesus, was experiencing significant turmoil between Jewish and Gentile factions (Winger 2014, 128).

Winger continues to discuss the time period of the Caesarean imprisonment as a time which fits the issues raised in Ephesians. Not only do matters of Jewish and Gentile background fit the timing, but also issues of citizenship were at the center of debate (Winger 2014, 128). Paul's concern with the feast of Pentecost also suggests his deliberate timing when he went to Jerusalem and was arrested. Winger notes that in the probably thinking of Paul, Pentecost would be connected to the giving of the Mosaic Law, suggestive of Ephesians 4:25-29, 6:2,, 4:7-16, 1:20-23, 2:6, 4:7-16, and 1:20-22 (Winger 2014, 129). Pentecost was also seen as the occasion of Israel's marriage with God through the Law, suggesting a tie to Ephesians 5:21-33. Finally, the work of the Holy Spirit is related, suggesting Ephesians 5:18.

Winger thus concludes that Ephesians was probably written from prison in Caesarea, early in his time there, probably around A.D. 52, based on the Gallio Inscription and Acts 18:12 (Winger 2014, 129). However, Winger does not consider the Roman imprisonment to be impossible, and his commentary allows for such a scenario (Winger 2014, 130). 

​
0 Comments

Ephesus in Paul's Time

4/4/2023

0 Comments

 
4/4/23
Scholarly Notes


Winger, Thomas M. "Introduction: The City of Ephesus and Paul's Relationship to It." Ephesians. St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 2014, 97-122.

The city of Ephesus, or its approximate site, has been occupied since approximately 1400 B.C. It has a history of being severely damaged by conquests and earthquakes. Of greatest interest to New Testament studies is the history since it was reconstructed shortly after Alexander the Great took control in 334 B.C. (Winger 2014, 97). The city was declared the capital of Asia by Augustus in 27 B.C. This created a new prosperity. The harbor access and the city's location on a major roadway combined to give the city significant economic advantages (Winger 2014, 98). It was one of the largest cities in the empire when Paul lived there, though the number of people is unknown. Winger estimates it at perhaps about 100,000 (Winger 2014, 100).

Ephesus at the time of Paul had significant religious diversity. Winger notes a large Jewish population, which was relatively free to keep their customs, so tended to flourish (Winger 2014, 100). There were multiple pagan temples as well, and we have "documentary evidence of the worship of up to fifty gods, including Greek, Egyptian, and local gods" (Winger 2014, 101). The most noteworthy was the temple of Artemis Ephesia, one of the seven wonders of the world. The temple was ruined in 262 A.D. by "Gothic plunder and Christian looting" (Winger 2014, 102).

The cult of Artemis has been difficult to describe in detail. Winger notes there was a month of festivities, probably in the spring, which featured competitions and processions (Winger 2014, 103). Winger sees this as a likely association with Cybele, the mother-earth goddess in Anatolian tradition. In short, the Ephesian version of Artemis is not necessarily the same as a Greek mythological version (Winger 2014, 104). Artemis was understood as a protector of chastity, especially in everyday behavior. Yet Winger observes that, though there is no direct evidence for ritual prostitution at Ephesus, the practice was normal in other goddess cults so probably was active in Ephesus as well (Winger 2014, 105). Winger certainly finds evidence in statuary and other depictions of Artemis serving as a fertility goddess (Winger 2014, 106-107). The cult of Artemis was associated with healing, rescue from death, and other magical powers (Winger 2014, 108-109).

Winger strongly recommends a close reading of Acts 18-20 so as to prepare to read Ephesians (Winger 2014, 110). Paul was present in Ephesus longer than in any other place he ministered, watching the church grow and thrive. When Paul went to Ephesus in Acts 19, it was on the heels of the ill-informed efforts of Apollos. Paul's question to the Ephesians was whether they received the Holy Spirit and were baptized rightly (Winger 2014, 111). This cryptic passage has proven a difficulty in many church circles. Winger unpacks the challenges with a brief exegesis (Winger 2014, 112-114).

During Paul's time in Ephesus, the account in Acts 19 details numerous conflicts (Winger 2014, 114ff). The Jews, by and large, did not receive the Christian message. Acts 19:11-20 describes incidents involving exorcists and magicians. Winger observes that the demons were more powerful than the exorcists but that God showed himself to be the most powerful (Winger 2014, 115). Paul's work also disrupted the work of money changes and idol makers (Winger 2014, 116-117). 

While in Ephesus, Paul wrote his first letter to the Corinthians, which he sent to them with Timothy (Acts 19:22, 1 Corinthians 4:17). Winger also observes that the letters to Timothy address him as being in Ephesus (Winger 2014, 118). The church was apparently in a state of difficulty. In Acts 20:1, Paul left for Macedonia due to the civil unrest. 1 Timothy speaks of caution and dealing with false teachers (Winger 2014, 119). As Paul went from Corinth to Jerusalem, he bypassed Ephesus but did pause to visit with the elders (Winger 2014, 120). The sermon recorded in Acts 20:18-35 urges the pastors to remain faithful no matter what. Winger describes it as very much like an ordination sermon.

Winger notes that upon Paul's return to Jerusalem in Acts 21, the accusations made against him had a relation to the presence of Trophimus, from Ephesus (Winger 2014, 121). The negative attitude of Jews in Jerusalem toward Ephesus may have served as a cause of Paul's encouraging words in Ephesians 3:1 and 13. Winger emphasizes that Paul's imprisonment is not the Ephesians' fault, but is for their benefit (Winger 2014, 121). 

​
0 Comments

Who Are the Ephesians?

4/3/2023

0 Comments

 
4/3/23
Scholarly Notes

Winger, Thomas M. "Introduction: Addressees." Ephesians. St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 2014, 77-96.

Not only the authorship, but also the recipients of Ephesians, has been called into question. Winger notes that some manuscript evidence omits "in Ephesus" from Ephesians 1:1 (Winger 2014, 77). The addressees are important in our attempts to interpret the letter, since we normally understand it in the context of other knowledge we have about Ephesus and Paul's work there.

The oldest extant portion, P46, omits "in Ephesus" but bears a header, "To the Ephesians" (Winger 2014, 78-79). Codex Sinaiticus and Vaticanus omit "in Ephesus" but have the words inserted in another hand (Winger 2014, 80). The scholarly debate has led to some uncertainty about the authenticity of the reading. However, Winger finds the sentence to be "nonsensical" (I would suggest merely clumsy and out of character) without "in Ephesus" (Winger 2014, 81).

Winger briefly reviews patristic evidence, noting that while Origen took the manuscript available to him to have an omission, Marcion affirmed the letter was really to the Laodiceans. Tertullian complained that Marcion falsified the title. Irenaeus, the Muratorian Canon, and Clement of Alexandria agreed with Tertullian. Of significance to Winger is that they didn't object on the grounds of the text, but the title, which suggests their texts didn't contain "in Ephesus" in verse one (Winger 2014, 84).

Winger describes several means by which "in Ephesus" could have dropped out of the text (Winger 2014, 85ff). Accidental inattention would have been very unlikely in the first sentence of a letter. A scribal change due to the impression that it was not meant for Ephesus is also highly unlikely. The omission of a place name in a copy of a circular letter going to a different place is much more likely. However, this theory has a number of problems as well, particularly as it violates the way circular letters were presented as a rule in antiquity (Winger 2014, 86). A theory that it was created on the basis of Colossians but assigned to Ephesus by a later disciple also breaks down rather easily (Winger 2014, 87), as does the idea that the text was used as a selection in a lectionary, so lost its personalization (Winger 2014, 88-89).

As to internal evidence for the addressees of Ephesians, Winger notes that there is no direct statement of a problem in Ephesus, that there are no greetings by name, and that Paul does not always seem to have personal knowledge which we would expect due to his time in Ephesus (Winger 2014, 91). Yet Winger observes a time of turmoil in Ephesus which may have prevented Paul from knowing the current situation (Winger 2014, 92).

Winger finally ties Paul's letter writing to that of John in Revelation and to the letters of Ignatius (Winger 2014, 93). Ignatius' letter to the Ephesians has numerous parallels, particularly in style, to Paul's letter. Winger details numerous parallels in content as well, illustrating that Ignatius apparently considered Ephesians to be written to Ephesus (Winger 2014, 94-96). 

​
0 Comments

Authorship of Ephesians

3/31/2023

0 Comments

 
3/31/23
Scholarly Notes


Winger, Thomas M. "Introduction: Authorship." Ephesians. St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 2014, 21-77.

Since the 18th century, scholarship has brought Ephesians from universal acceptance as a Pauline letter onto a battleground where the authorship is disputed (Winger 2014, 22). Winger does not consider questions of authorship problematic by nature. However, as the apostolic authors sought to identify themselves to the recipients of their writings, it is important that we pursue the correct understanding of who the author was and what his concerns were (Winger 2014, 23). Interpretation is thus bound to the question of authorship.

Winger moves on to consider the case for Pauline authorship of Ephesians (Winger 2014, 25). The self-identification in the opening is in accord with the usage which is agreed to be Pauline. He identifies himself again in 3:1 as a "prisoner" in accord with Acts 21:27-28. His presentation of himself and of the Ephesians is consistent with other information we know. Other early Christian works uniformly identified Ephesians as a work of Paul (Winger 2014, 26). Further, early writings used the concepts and even wording of Ephesians as authoritative text, as illustrated on pp. 28-31 with extensive parallel quotations.

Winger next turns to the case against Pauline authorship (Winger 2014, 33). The move against Pauline authorship began in the very late 1700s and early 1800s. The arguments are admittedly piecemeal and work out only based on a cumulative effect. According to Winger, critics of Pauline authorship resist evaluation of their arguments one point at a time (Winger 2014, 33).

The style of writing in Ephesians is more ponderous than that of Galatians and Romans. There is a high frequency of long sentences, often characterized by lengthy periodic elements (Winger 2014, 34).

The vocabulary of Ephesians, while it is different from that of the New Testament as a whole, is also significantly different from the undisputed letters of Paul (Winger 2014, 37-38). The vocabulary is more similar to that of the Pastorals. Since those are considered to be of doubtful authorship by some in the scholarly community, Ephesians is as well. Winger considers this "a fragile house of cards" (Winger 2014, 37).

The thought and theology of Ephesians are also considered suspect by some. Ephesians takes a high view of the work of apostles (2:20) while 1 Corinthians makes a point of exalting Christ rather than his apostles and prophets (Winger 2014, 38). As to ecclesiology, Ephesians tends to focus on the church rather than Christ as the head. The relationship of Jews and Gentiles seems well settled. References to "church" are to the universal body, as opposed to a local instance, as we find in the other letters (Winger 2014, 39). As to Christology Ephesians typically looks not to justification and the cross but rather to the glorification of Christ and the resurrection to come (Winger 2014, 40). Baur and some others have suggested Ephesians in use of language about "mystery" places it as post-apostolic and a product of early Gnostic belief. Winger does not consider this to be a significant current trend (Winger 2014, 40). The expectation of a life of good works shown in Ephesians may be seen as contrasting to Paul's position of salvation by grace alone in Romans (Winger 2014, 41). Christ's nullification of the Law (2:15) is in tension with Romans 3:31, where Paul affirms the Law. Paul often speaks of salvation in the future, while in Ephesians it is a present reality. Some scholars take Ephesians' creedal formula (4:4-6) and view of baptism as a development too late for Paul (Winger 2014, 42). Rather than a sharp dividing line of tension between the present and future aspect of salvation, Ephesians may take less of an interest in immediate eschatological hope. This is normally viewed as a later theological development. The overall picture is that of the beginning of a broad, catholic understanding of the Christian life, which may have been a development later than Paul (Winger 2014, 42-43). Finally, both the distinctive nature of Ephesians and its striking similarity to Colossians have cast doubt on the authorship (Winger 2014, 44-45).

Winger steps through the arguments of the case against Paul one at a time, raising challenges (Winger 2014, 47ff). In terms of style and vocabulary, the structure is very like the acknowledged letters of Paul, though the sentence structure is more intricate than we normally see. There is not enough Pauline material to evaluate the matter scientifically (Winger 2014, 48). The specific vocabulary is not highly unusual. Winger further notes that within about 50 years we see other examples of the same words in use. This is not long enough to assume major changes in regional vocabulary usage (Winger 2014, 49). The relatively complex style of Ephesians suggests a "liturgical" concern to Winger. The stress on prayer, the doxologies, and the creedal statements lend themselves to a context in which the more elevated language is appropriate (Winger 2014, 53). The rhetorical elements used may also have been related to the known audience and their customs. Winger notes that Ephesus had its own dialectic customs, that Paul had been in Ephesus for several years, and that the rhetorical style matches that of 1 Timothy, addressed to the pastor at Ephesus (Winger 2014, 54-55_. As to doctrine and thought, Winger observes that Schnackenburg argues for much of the New Testament to be relatively late due to time needed for development of theological concepts (Winger 2014, 55). Winger addresses these distinctives in some detail. Each decreases or disappears in its significance under scrutiny. We leave to the student the detailed evaluations (Winger 2014, 55-68 passim). They serve not only to address the issues at hand, but also as an example of fair scholarly interaction with sources and ideas.

Winger freely admits the close relationship between Ephesians and "its fraternal twin, Colossians" (Winger 2014, 68). There is some question about whether the two letters use the concepts of headship (Winger 2014, 68), mystery, and stewardship in the same way (Winger 2014, 69). Winger examines the terms as used in context, concluding that the concepts in the two letters are managed in similar ways. The differences are primarily required by the variety of referents elsewhere in the sentences.

The final issue Winger considers in terms of authorship is whether Ephesians would be an example of pseudepigraphy (Winger 2014, 71). Writings claiming authorship by a respected master in a field were not uncommon in late antiquity, and Winger observes that the practice was not necessarily looked down upon (Winger 2014, 72). However, for the most part, pseudonymity was recognized and not considered to have the authority of a work by the actual named author. Ephesians makes a clear claim to be written by Paul himself. Paul does warn (2 Thessalonians 2:2) against letters claiming to be by Paul (Winger 2014, 74). However, Ephesians was weighed by the same early Christians who were warned against and effectively rejected some writings. It is reasonable to believe the evaluation was done with care (Winger 2014, 75). Ephesians was early and consistently recognized to bear the authority of Paul the apostle.

​
0 Comments

Orality and Pauline Epistles

3/30/2023

0 Comments

 
3/30/23
Scholarly Notes


Winger, Thomas M. "Introduction: Orality and the Interpretation of the Epistles: A Brief Introduction." Ephesians. St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 2014, 3-20.

Winger introduces the New Testament Epistles in terms of orality. In his estimation, the adaptation of oral sources into written documents was part of the process of creating the Gospels (Winger 2014, 4). Winger suggests that the written Epistles should best be understood as "a script for an oral production" (Winger 2014, 5). The habit in antiquity of reading aloud is an indicator of the importance of orality. Winger does briefly consider that writing was considered from Plato through Papias as inferior as a means of gaining information, an interpretation I would dispute (Winger 2014, 6). Yet it is clear, as winger affirms, that proclamation, oral delivery of a word, is considered the superior means of receiving testimony (Winger 2014, 8).

The Epistles of Paul were likely expected to be read in their entirety at worship gatherings. Winger notes Justin Martyr saying that reading lasts "as long as time permits" (Winger 2014, 10, quote of Justin's First Apology, 67). Most of Paul's letters require no more than 15 minutes to read. There are, additionally, liturgical features present, most notably invocations and benedictions. Winter notes comparisons here between the end of 1 Corinthians and the end of the Communion rite in Didache 14 (Winger 2014, 11). 

Winger briefly details the use of a variety of oral patterns to be found in Paul's Epistles, and especially Ephesians. Some features of rhetoric common to Aristotle and others are evident (Winger 2014, 13). Paul uses a number of commonplaces, such as lists of virtues and vices. He is fond of alliteration, not always as word choice for meaning, but sometimes for sound. Rhythmic speech is also evident, along with repetition of elements to emphasize or order concepts (Winger 2014, 14). Paul uses parallelism frequently for emphasis (Winger 2014, 16). Winger also provides examples of chiasm in Paul, as well as inclusio, which he uses more as a tactic for paragraphing (Winger 2014, 17). Winger particularly illustrates this sort of construction with a chart based on Ephesians 2:1010, then one based on Ephesians 5:21-33 and, within that, on 5:21-24 (Winger 2014, 19). Paul also uses lists, often marked with conjunctions or other formulaic word patterns. All these are aids to organization and flow of ideas (Winger 2014, 19-21).

​
0 Comments

    ​Help Fuel This Ministry by Clicking Here!

    All the work of Wittenberg Door Campus Ministry, including this blog, is supported by the generosity of people like you. Please consider joining our team of prayer and financial supporters. Read more here!
    Please Note: The opinions presented in blog posts are not necessarily those of Wittenberg Door Campus Ministry. Frequently we report on contrary views, often without comment. Please chime in on the discussion.

    About Throwing Inkwells

    When Martin Luther was dealing with struggles in his life he once saw what appeared to be an angelic being. Not trusting that he was going to be informed by someone other than the God revealed in Scripture, he took the appearance to be untrustworthy and hurled his inkwell at it. The chipped place in the plaster wall is still visible at the Wartburg Castle, though apparently the ink stain on the wall has been refreshed periodically by the caretaker.

    Blog Feeds

    RSS Feed

    Want to keep up with what's happening at Wittenberg Door? Subscribe to our mailing list!

    Categories

    All
    1 Corinthians
    1 John
    1 Kings
    1 Peter
    1 Samuel
    1 Thessalonians
    1 Timothy
    2019-02-feb
    2 Chronicles
    2 Corinthians
    2-john
    2 Kings
    2 Peter
    2 Samuel
    2 Thessalonians
    2 Timothy
    3-john
    Academic-success
    Acts
    Advent 1
    Advent-1-a
    Advent-1b
    Advent-1c
    Advent 2
    Advent-2-a
    Advent-2b
    Advent-2c
    Advent 3
    Advent-3-a
    Advent-3b
    Advent-3c
    Advent 4
    Advent-4-a
    Advent-4b
    Advent-4c
    Akagi 2016
    Alesso-2009
    Alexander 1999
    Allegory
    Allitt-2010
    All Saints' Day
    Alon 1996
    Amos
    Anaphora
    Anointing
    Anunciation
    Apollinaris Of Hierapolis
    Apostolical Constitutions
    Aristides Of Athens
    Aristotle
    Aryeh 2021
    Ascension Day
    Ash Wednesday
    Athenagoras Of Athens
    Audet 1996
    Augustine
    Bakker 1993
    Balabanski 1997
    Bammel 1996
    Baptism
    Baptism Of Christ
    Baptism-of-the-lord-b
    Bardy 1938
    Baron 2019
    Baron & Maponya 2020
    Bauckham 1984
    Bauckham 2006
    Bauckham 2007
    Beale 1984
    Belief
    Belonging
    Ben-Amos 1999
    Betz 1996
    Biesenthal 1893
    Bigg 1904
    Bigg 1905
    Blogcation
    Blomberg 1984
    Boehme-2010
    Botha 1967
    Botha 1993
    Braaten 2007
    Bruce1988
    Bruce-1988
    Bryennios
    Butler 1960
    Caneday 2017
    Canonicity
    Capon1998
    Capon-1998
    Carr 2010
    Carson-1991
    Carson-moo-2005
    Catholicism
    Cerfaux 1959
    Chilton 1984
    Chrismation
    Christmas-1b
    Christmas-1c
    Christmas Dawn
    Christmas-day
    Christmas Eve
    Christmas Midnight
    Chronicles
    Circumcision And Naming Of Christ
    Cody 1995
    Colossians
    Conditions
    Confession Of Peter
    Confessions
    Connolly 1932
    Connolly 1933
    Connolly 1934
    Constanza-2013
    Cooper & Lioy 2018
    Costa 2021
    Court 1981
    Culley 1986
    Cyprian
    Daly 1978
    Daniel
    Danielou 1956
    Davids 1984
    Davis 1995
    DeHalleux 1996
    Dehandschutter 1995
    Deuteronomy
    Didache
    Diversity
    Divine Fellowship
    Dix 1933
    Dix2005
    Dix-2005
    Doane 1994
    Draper
    Draper 1984
    Draper 1989
    Draper 1995
    Draper-1996
    Draper-1997
    Draper-2000
    Draper-2006
    Dube 2016
    Due 2003
    Easter-2
    Easter-2a
    Easter2b
    Easter-2c
    Easter-3
    Easter-3a
    Easter-3b
    Easter-3c
    Easter-4
    Easter-4a
    Easter-4b
    Easter-4c
    Easter-5
    Easter-5a
    Easter-5b
    Easter-6
    Easter-6a
    Easter-6b
    Easter-6c
    Easter-7
    Easter-7a
    Easter-7b
    Easter-7c
    Easter-b
    Easter-day
    Easter-monday
    Easter-sunday-a
    Easter-sunday-c
    Easter-sunrise
    Easter-tuesday
    Easter-wednesday
    Ecclesiastes
    Eleutheria2014
    Elman-1999
    Ephesians
    Epiphany
    Epiphany-1c
    Epiphany-2-a
    Epiphany-2c
    Epiphany-3-a
    Epiphany-3b
    Epiphany-3c
    Epiphany-4-a
    Epiphany-4b
    Epiphany-4c
    Epiphany-5-a
    Epiphany-5b
    Epiphany-5c
    Epiphany-6-a
    Epiphany-6c
    Epiphany-7-a
    Epiphany-c
    Epistle Of Barnabas
    Esther
    Eucharist
    Eve-of-the-circumcision-of-christ
    Exodus
    Exodus-20
    Experiential Reading
    Eybers 1975
    Ezekiel
    Ezra
    Fagerberg1988
    Fagerberg-1988
    Farrell-1987
    Flew-2007
    Flusser-1996
    Forde-2007
    Fraade-1999
    France-2007
    Galatians
    Garrow 2004
    Gender
    Genesis
    Gero 1977
    Gibbins 1935
    Gibbs 2006
    Glover-1958
    Goga & Popa 2019
    Gonzalez-2010
    Good-friday
    Gospels
    Greek
    Grosvener-schaff-1885
    Grosvenor-1884
    Guardian-of-jesus
    Habakkuk
    Haggai
    Hagner 1984
    Harnack-1884
    Harris 1887
    Harris 1984
    Hearon 2004
    Hearon 2010
    Hebrews
    Heilmann 2018
    Henderson1992
    Henderson-1992
    Henderson 1995
    Hezser 2010
    History
    Hoffman-1986
    Holy Cross Day
    Holy-innocents
    Holy-saturday
    Horsley 2010
    Hosea
    Hutchens2013
    Hymes-1994
    Ignatius Of Antioch
    Infertility
    Isaiah
    Jaffee-1999
    James
    James Of Jerusalem
    James The Elder
    Jefford 1989
    Jefford 1995
    Jeffreys-1986
    Jeremiah
    Jerome
    Job
    Joel
    John
    Jonah
    Jones & Mirecki 1995
    Joseph
    Joshua
    Jude
    Judges
    Jungmann-1959
    Justin Martyr
    Kelber-1987
    Kelber-1995
    Kelber 2002
    Kelber 2010
    Kelber & Sanders 2010
    Kevil
    Kings
    Kleinig-2013
    Kloppenborg 1979
    Kloppenborg 1995
    Koch2010
    Kok 2015
    Kolb2000
    Kolb-2000
    Kolbarand2008
    Kolb-arand-2008
    Kurekchomycz2009
    Lake 1905
    Lamentations
    Last-sunday-of-the-church-year
    Last-sunday-of-the-church-year-a
    Last-sunday-of-the-church-year-b
    Last-sunday-of-the-church-year-c
    Last Supper
    LaVerdiere 1996
    Layton 1968
    Lectionary
    Lent-1
    Lent-1-a
    Lent-1b
    Lent-1c
    Lent-2
    Lent-2-a
    Lent-2b
    Lent-2c
    Lent-3
    Lent-3-a
    Lent-3b
    Lent-3c
    Lent-4
    Lent-4-a
    Lent-4b
    Lent-4c
    Lent-5
    Lent-5-a
    Lent-5b
    Lent-5c
    Lessing2014
    Lessing-2014
    Leviticus
    Lincoln-1885
    Lindemann 1997
    Literary Character
    Liturgy
    Livesey 2012
    Long-2009
    Lord-1986
    Lord-1987
    Lord's Prayer
    Luke
    Luther
    Maas-2014
    Maccoull-1999
    Maier 1984
    Malachi
    Manuscripts
    Mark
    Marty-2016
    Martyrdom Of John The Baptist
    Martyrs
    Mary Magdalene
    Mary Mother Of Our Lord
    Mason-1998
    Massaux 1993 (1950)
    Matthew
    Matthias
    Mazza 1995
    Mazza-1996
    Mazza 1999
    Mbamalu 2014
    McDonald 1980
    McDonnell & Montague 1991
    McKean 2003
    Mcknight-2014
    Micah
    Middleton 1935
    Milavec 1995
    Milavec-2003
    Milavec2012
    Miller 2019
    Missional
    Mitch-2010
    Mitchell 1995
    Molina-evers-1998
    Monday-in-holy-week
    Montenyohl-1993
    Morris-1992
    Motyer-1993
    Mueller-2006
    Muilenburg 1929
    Music
    Nahum
    Nehemiah
    Neufeld-1999
    Newsletter
    Newtestament
    New Testament
    Niditch-1995
    Niditch 2003
    Niebuhr 1956
    Niederwimmer-1982
    Niederwimmer 1995
    Niederwimmer-1996
    Numbers
    Obadiah
    Oldtestament
    Old Testament
    Olsen-1986
    Ong-1987
    Ong-1988
    Ong-1995
    Oralit
    Orality
    Ordination
    Orphan-hosting
    Osborne-2002
    Osborne-2013
    Ozment1980
    Ozment-1980
    Palm-sunday
    Palm-sunday-a
    Palm-sunday-c
    Pardee 1995
    Parks-1986
    Passionb
    Patterson 1995
    Pearce-1993
    Pentateuch
    Pentecost-10a
    Pentecost-10b
    Pentecost-10c
    Pentecost-11a
    Pentecost-11b
    Pentecost-11c
    Pentecost-12a
    Pentecost-12b
    Pentecost-12c
    Pentecost-13a
    Pentecost-13b
    Pentecost13c
    Pentecost-13c
    Pentecost-14a
    Pentecost-14b
    Pentecost-14c
    Pentecost-15
    Pentecost-15a
    Pentecost-15b
    Pentecost-15c
    Pentecost-16
    Pentecost-16a
    Pentecost-16b
    Pentecost-16c
    Pentecost-17a
    Pentecost-17b
    Pentecost 17C
    Pentecost-18a
    Pentecost-18b
    Pentecost 18 C
    Pentecost-19a
    Pentecost-19b
    Pentecost 19 C
    Pentecost-1a
    Pentecost-20a
    Pentecost-20b
    Pentecost 20 C
    Pentecost-21a
    Pentecost-21b
    Pentecost 21 C
    Pentecost-22a
    Pentecost-22b
    Pentecost 22 C
    Pentecost-23a
    Pentecost-23b
    Pentecost 23 C
    Pentecost-24a
    Pentecost-24b
    Pentecost-24-c
    Pentecost-25b
    Pentecost-25-c
    Pentecost-26b
    Pentecost-26-c
    Pentecost-2a
    Pentecost-2b
    Pentecost-2c
    Pentecost-3a
    Pentecost-3b
    Pentecost-3c
    Pentecost-4a
    Pentecost-4b
    Pentecost-4c
    Pentecost-5a
    Pentecost-5b
    Pentecost-5c
    Pentecost-6a
    Pentecost-6b
    Pentecost-6c
    Pentecost-7a
    Pentecost-7b
    Pentecost-7c
    Pentecost-8a
    Pentecost-8b
    Pentecost-8c
    Pentecost-9a
    Pentecost-9b
    Pentecost-9c
    Pentecost-b
    Pentecost-c
    Pentecost Eve
    Pentecost Monday
    Pentecost Sunday
    Pentecost Tuesday
    Petersen 1994
    Peterson2010
    Peterson 2010
    Philemon
    Philippians
    Philosophy
    Picirilli 1988
    Pick 1908
    Pieper1924
    Pieper 1924
    Pieper 1968
    Piper 1947
    Powell 2000
    Prayer
    Preaching
    Presentation Of Our Lord
    Proctor 2019
    Proper-19c
    Proper-20c
    Proper 21C
    Proper 22C
    Proper 23C
    Proper 24C
    Proper 25C
    Proper 26C
    Proper 27C
    Proper 28C
    Prophets
    Proverbs
    Psalm
    Psalms
    Quinquagesima
    Quintilian
    Rabbinic Character
    Real Presence
    Receptivity
    Reed 1995
    Reformation
    Reformation Day
    Reinhartz 2018
    Resurrection
    Revelation
    Rhetoric
    Rhoads 2010
    Richardson & Gooch 1984
    Riggs 1995
    Ritual Meal
    Romans
    Rordorf 1996
    Rosenberg 1986
    Rosenberg 1987
    Rosenfeld-levene-2012
    Rueger-2016
    Russo 1994
    Ruth
    Sacrament
    Sacrifice
    Saenger 1999
    Sailhamer1992
    Sailhamer-1992
    Sale 1996
    Samuel
    Scaer2004
    Scaer-2004
    Schaff 1886
    Schaff 1888
    Schaff 1889
    Schaff 2014
    Schaff-2014
    Schollgen
    Schwarz 2005
    Scriptural Usage
    Seeliger 1996
    Septuagesima
    Sermon
    Sexagesima
    Simon And Jude
    Smith-2009
    Smith 2018
    Sommerville-2006
    Songofsongs
    St. Andrew
    Stark 1997
    St. Barnabas
    St. Bartholomew
    St. John
    St. John The Baptist
    St Luke
    St Mark
    St Matthew
    St. Matthias
    St Michael And All Angels
    St. Paul
    St. Peter And Paul
    St Philip And St James
    Strawbridge 2017
    St. Stephen
    St. Thomas
    St. Titus
    Sunday Of The Passion
    Tatian
    Taylor 1888
    TDNT
    Teaching
    Telfer 1939
    Tertullian
    Textual Comparison
    Textual Integrity
    Theophilos 2018
    Theophilus Of Antioch
    Thielman 2010
    Thursday In Holy Week
    Timothy
    Titus
    Transfiguration
    Transfiguration-a
    Transfigurationb
    Transfiguration-c
    Trinity 1
    Trinity 10
    Trinity 11
    Trinity 12
    Trinity 13
    Trinity 14
    Trinity 15
    Trinity 16
    Trinity 17
    Trinity 18
    Trinity 19
    Trinity 2
    Trinity 20
    Trinity 21
    Trinity 22
    Trinity 23
    Trinity 3
    Trinity 4
    Trinity 5
    Trinity 6
    Trinity 7
    Trinity 8
    Trinity 9
    Trinity-a
    Trinity-b
    Trinity-c
    Trinity Sunday
    Tsang 2009
    Tuckett
    Tuesday In Holy Week
    Tuilier 1995
    Twelftree 1984
    Two Ways
    Ty 19
    Van Der Merwe 2017
    Van Der Merwe 2019
    Van Der Watt 2008
    Van De Sandt 2002
    Van De Sandt 2007
    Van-de-sandt-2010
    Van-de-sandt-2011
    Van De Sandt & Flusser 2002
    Van Deventer 2021
    Varner 2005
    Vatican II
    Veith1993
    Veith-1993
    Veith-sutton-2017
    Vikis-Freibergs 1997
    Visitation
    Voobus 1968
    Voobus 1969
    Warfield 1886
    Wasson & Toelken 1998
    Wednesday In Holy Week
    Wenham 1984
    Wenham 1992
    Weston-2009
    Wilson2011
    Wilson-2011
    Wilson20113470b5cf10
    Winger 2014
    Wolmarans 2005
    Wright 1984
    Young 2011
    Ysebaert-2002
    Zechariah
    Zephaniah

Proudly powered by Weebly