Wittenberg Door Campus Ministry
  • Home
  • Calendar
    • Events
  • Blog
  • Recording Archives
  • Resources
    • Christianity 101
    • Greek Tutorials
  • About
    • About Wittenberg CoMo
    • Support Us
    • Contact Us
  • Position Papers
  • Sandbox
  • Greek Tutorials

A Model of Communion as a Means of Oppression (shaking my head)

5/16/2022

0 Comments

 
5/16/22
Scholarly Reflections

Riggs, John W. "The Sacred Food of Didache 9-10 and Second-Century Ecclesiologies." in Jefford, Clayton (editor). The Didache in Context: essays on its text, history, and transmission. Leiden: Brill, 1995, 256-283.

Riggs sets out to use the prayers of Didache 9-10 as a means by which to understand the trajectory he finds from a table-sharing meal at the time of Jesus to a symbolic sacramental act which he can identify near the end of the second century (Riggs 1995, 256). He begins his argument with a denail, which he considers common in current scholarship, of any "last supper of Jesus such as that which is portrayed in Paul's letter to Corinth or in the gospels" (Riggs 1995, 257). Affirming the work of the Jesus Seminar, he sees the last supper accounts as later ecclesial compositions. The significant element of the narrative, as Riggs suggests is proven by numerous scholars, is that the communal meal as an "occasion for social formation" would certainly be central (Riggs 1995, 259). Riggs and the sources he relies on act with an assumption that all the biblical passages referenced have been heavily redacted so as to create meanings which are often absent from our intuitive understanding of the passages as they stand in their present context.

At some point, but early in its history, Riggs considers there to be a shift from what he would describe as a "pre-Pauline" and "Palestinian" understanding of table fellowship to a more "Markan" and "Hellenistic" view, where the elements themselves become more important than remembering and sharing. After that shift, "divine presence can only be understood as somehting which is present materially, that is, the literal bread and wine themselves" (Riggs 1995, 262, emphasis Riggs'). Riggs considers this to be aview clearly expressed in Ignatius (Riggs 1995, 263). Drawing on 20th century anthropological research, Riggs concludes that accounts of food serve functions, normally to distinguish among various stratas in a society (Riggs 1995, 264).

Riggs finds that the prayer of Didache 9-10 "reveals a transition from table-sharing towards divine food" (Riggs 1995, 265). He theorizes that the lessspecific prayer of chapter 10 was composed earlier, then the more specific elements in chapter nine were inserted so as to remind participants of a meal custom which had been lost but was now re-interpreted as a Christian celebration of the elements (Riggs 1995, 265-266). This coincided with what Riggs would characterize as a decline in Christian missionary activity and a growth in Christian population as the exclusive claims of Christianity were made more plain (Riggs 1995, 267). He takes this shift in the view of eating and drinking to be complete by the close of the second century, and to be evidenced in progress by the Didache, which he places in the middle of the second century (Riggs 1995, 270).

Riggs continues by discussing a distinction of boundaries within the Didache by considering the matter of itinerant prophets and table-sharing (Riggs 1995, 276). He sees this as a development in "patriarchalization" by which the leaders of the Christian community take on the authority of God so as to marginalize others, specifically women (Riggs 1995, 276-277). This is foreshadowed in Ignatius but Riggs sees it more fully developed in the Didache. The table is fenced in Didache 9.5 so as to keep those who are unworthy from eating (Riggs 1995, 278). Riggs takes this to be the work of the bishops and elders, who are permanent officers from within the community, an ideaa he considers akin to the Roman custom of patronage. In Riggs' estimation, this power structure reversed the model in Luke/Acts by which all were welcome (Riggs 1995, 281). It eventually resulted in only the bishop having control over the food supply, and being able to separate the laity from the table (Riggs 1995, 282).

Riggs concludes that the Didache serves as a valuable testament to the development of boundaries regarding food, and thus to exclusion of certain people from power and food (Riggs 1995, 282). He closes with an expression which suggests surprise that Chrsitianity continued to advance in this apparently oppressive atmosphere (Riggs 1995, 283). ​
0 Comments

Baptism Reimagined in Early Christianity

5/13/2022

0 Comments

 
5/13/22
Scholarly Reflections

Mitchell, Nathan. "Baptism in the Didache." in Jefford, Clayton (editor). The Didache in Context: essays on its text, history, and transmission. Leiden: Brill, 1995, 226-255.

Mitchell notes that the description of baptism in Didache 7 is noteworthy for what it does not mention. A constellation of features we normally associate with baptism is absent (Mitchell 1995, 226). In his article, Mitchell makes several of his presuppositions clear, particularly his view of the multi-stage redaction process of the Didache (Mitchell 1995, 227ff). 

The presuppositions Mitchell makes about the redactional history of the Didache lead him to particular moves in his attempt to identify the community where it may have originated (Mitchell 1995, 231ff). He finds that chapters 1-5, which he assigns to the earliest stage of composition, reflects a type of Christianity to be found among Hellenized Jews who have converted. The Torah is assumed as an important presupposition (Mitchell 1995, 231). Mitchell theorizes that because the Didache community understood itself primarily as Hellenized Jews, there would not be many Christological statements (Mitchell 1995, 232). Their view may well have been that Jesus' activity was more that of a personal agent of God, rather than that of a divine person. This view would have an impact on the way one might have described a Christian. Mitchell considers Draper's view (1991) that Matthew and the Didache emerged from the same community about the same time to be helpful here. If in fact they were part of a dialectical relationship rather than one having a literary dependence on the other, we could see the Didache explaining how a community can follow Jesus, rather than explaining the doctrines about Jesus (Mitchell 1995, 234-235). Draper's thought is that the gospel genre played the role of authoritative teaching while works like the Didache served as a community rule, describing how we conduct affairs in light of the gospel. This could explain the fact that the Didache seems more inclined to exclude those who turn away from the community (Mitchell 1995, 236). It is a practical, not a theological work. Christians are those who have clearly turned from sin into the works of righteousness.

Mitchell continues by seeking out the origins of Christian baptism as described in the Didache He takes the community most likely to be in or near Antioch (Mitchell 1995, 238). and to have endured a number of conflicts regarding the nature of Christian fellowship. Table fellowship even around non-ceremonial meals was a matter of significant controversy in some communities. This may have led to the presence of statements about ritual purity and foods in Didache 6.3, immediately before the discussion of baptism (Mitchell 1995, 239). Purity in foods could be a requirement for baptism, which in turn could be the start of requirements for further table fellowship, culminating in eucharistic fellowship (Mitchell 1995, 240). The stage is thus set, in Mitchell's opinion, for a consideration of the source of Christian baptism and its relation to Didache 7, as well as the description of the eucharistic meals in Didache 9-10 (Mitchell 1995, 242).

Jesus' baptism as described in Matthew may be seen as an association with sinful humans and a commitment to Torah (Mitchell 1995, 243). Jesus' baptism would thus open the door to a life in the path of righteousness. Mitchell describes theories which then root Jesus' ministry in John's teaching, later changed when Jesus, in Galilee, begins to alter the traditional understanding of baptism as entry to a lifestyle prescribed by Torah (Mitchell 1995, 244ff). After Jesus' death, while some, such as Paul, interpreted baptism Christologically, we still see instances of Christians who understood baptism in terms of the work of John the Baptist (Acts 19:1-10, Acts 18:24-28) (Mitchell 1995, 246). Baptism may be associated not with the bodily resurrection of Jesus, but rather with a hope of a personal resurrection. This creates a continuity of thought between Matthew 24:30-31 and Didache 16.6 (Mitchell 1995, 247). John's baptism thus takes on Christian significance.

Mitchell continues by presenting a text of Didache 7, followed by his translation and commentary on the text (Mitchell 1995, 248ff). He notes the lack of identification of the one authorized to baptize (Mitchell 1995, 250), as well as the implication that the catechumen is to have been taught the Two Ways material. The preparatory fasting, applied certainly to the catechumen and optionally to others he views as a practice which Jesus had rejected in his ministry (Mitchell 1995, 251). He takes "living water" to be that gathered from a spring rather than a cistern (Mitchell 1995, 251-252), giving a number of Old Testament examples. The formula may be trinitarian, though Mitchell takes the trinitarian forms of 7.1c and 7.3 to be a later accretion, with the "into the name of 9.5 as original (Mitchell 1995, 252-253).

Mitchell concludes that the import of "baptism in the Didache is not a rite of 'christological' significance, but of eschatological meaning" (Mitchell 1995, 255). The theology moves the participant to a life of actions which show ritual purity. It does not usher one into full fellowship, but sets the stage to observe the Torah.

0 Comments

Finally, the Conceptual Context!

5/12/2022

0 Comments

 
5/12/22
Scholarly Reflections

Reed, Jonathan. "The Hebrew Epic and the Didache." in Jefford, Clayton (editor). The Didache in Context: essays on its text, history, and transmission. Leiden: Brill, 1995, 213-225.

Reed observes that most scholarship related to the Didache has not focused on the Didachist's use of the Hebrew Scriptures, merely providing some cross references (Reed 1995, 213). The absence of multiple manuscripts of the Didache creates challenges to interpretation of the text (Reed 1995, 214). Reed suggests overcoming some of these challenges by evaluating the Didache's references to the Old Testament in terms of how the reader of the Didache's time would understand them as a part of the larger Old Testament context. He calls this an evaluation in terms of its "Hebrew epic" (Reed 1995, 214).

For the purposes of Reed's pattern, the specific wording of a text or the analysis of genre does not matter very much. Rather, he considers it important to enter the thought life underlying a passage or a cultural situation (Reed 1995, 215). Reed specifies that this approach also avoids the necessity, found in much scholarship, of attempting to identify a chronology of different layers of redaction in the Didache. The overall message is its epic (Reed 1995, 216).

Reed considers the epic of the major sections of the Didache separately. In the Two Ways section, chapters 1-6, he finds strong shadows of Leviticus 17-26, Exodus 20, and Deuteronomy 5 (Reed 1995, 216). As Reed describes it, the overarching concept is that of ways of life and death, blessing and curse. The language is somewhat similar, but the philosophy is very similar (Reed 1995, 217). The importation of Jesus' teaching into the passage does not seem to be a departure from the Old Testament concepts or standards. Rather, it is viewed as a natural outcome of the Mosaic ideas (Reed 1995, 219). 

The ritual material, from Didache 7-10, makes little reference to the Old Testament (Reed 1995, 219). Reed finds rather than a specific Old Testament reference, that the prescriptions are related to Jewish prayers of the first century. Reed does list several elements of the prayers which would lead to an understanding of considerable continuity with the Old Testament picture of Israel (Reed 1995, 220).

Didache 11-15 is commonly understood as a "church order." The ethics of chapters 1-6 are put into operation in the context of the rituals of chapters 7-10. The community thus gathered has people in roles described in chapters 11-15 (Reed 1995, 221). The various roles and observances are cast in terms ofan Old Testament ethos.

The apocalyptic material in Didache 16 issues warnings which Reed finds gathered from Matthew, Daniel, and Zechariah (Reed 1995, 223). The chapter draws the reader's attention backward to the Way of Death in chapter six, as well as to the rituals which urge regular meeting together. The roles of true prophets are related to those roles laid out in the church order section (Reed 1995, 224).

In conclusion, Reed finds the Didache to have a clear, coherent view of its context in society and in relationship to the Old and New Testaments. It depicts present realities of life in the Christian community (Reed 1995, 225). 

​
0 Comments

Why Say It This Way and Not That Way?

5/11/2022

0 Comments

 
5/11/22
Scholarly Reflections

Henderson, Ian H. "Style-Switching in the Didache: Fingerprint or Argument?" in Jefford, Clayton (editor). The Didache in Context: essays on its text, history, and transmission. Leiden: Brill, 1995, 177-209.

Henderson considers the Didache as a challenge for scholars, primarily because analytical frameworks which have been fruitful in New Testament scholarship have proven not to work when applied to the Didache (Henderson 1995, 177). He finds in the Didache a dependence on the concepts of one or more Gospels, but possibly in an oral compositional style. He also thinks the text may serve as a sort of response to the written gospel accounts. Henderson finds certain inconsistencies in the style of the Didache. This article attempts to understand the inconsistencies as the result of style switching, presumably between a literary and an oral compositional view (Henderson 1995, 178). 

Henderson commends the work of C.M. Tuckett ("Synoptic Tradition in the Didache" in J-M. Sevrin (ed.). The New Testament in Early Christianity. Louvain, 1989, 197-230.), who made a thorough and scholarly study of style switching (Henderson 1995, 178). Henderson describes the process in some detail. Tuckett considers references to the final redactional stage in a Gospel (or other work) to presuppose knowledge of that entire work in its final form. Of significance here is the fact that the Didache has many references to ideas found in the Synoptic Gospels, including their final layers, the ideas are often used in arguments unrelated to their use in the Synoptics (Henderson 1995, 180). In fact, Tuckett finds that the Didache seems to studiously avoid use of the arguments found in Matthew or Luke. At the same time, the Didache bears what Henderson would consider a clear fingerprint of its own (Henderson 1995, 181). While the conceptual material is drawn from other sources, the argument, expression, and concusions are specific to the Didachist.

Henderson goes on to analyze the various recent approaches which recent scholarship has taken toward stylistics. Within the grammatical tradition of scholarship, aspects of grammar are identified to draw out a grammatical pattern which an author may have used (Henderson 1995, 186). Another area of style is that of wording and phrasing. When the Didache adopts an idea from another text, it may well restate the idea with a different wording. This may suggest a difference in a preferred means of expression, rather than a different source or an inferior or superior grasp of the concepts (Henderson 1995, 189). In a similar way, assessing a text for linguistic cultural elements such as Semitisms or other means of expression specific to a culture easily becomes an arbitrary sort of analysis (Henderson 1995, 190).

The developments of rhetorical criticism of the New Testament strike Henderson as important. Here it is important to focus on both style and substance, with a goal of understanding the process by which we might reach the conclusion of an argument (Henderson 1995, 191). The process of argumentation used is the essential element of study. One important challenge to rhetorical analysis is the fact that ancient rhetoricians classified styles and their relative desirability vary differently from one another, a concept Henderson describes in some detail (Henderson 1995, 192ff). Further, the style of an author, the style required by the traditions of the text, and the style of communication expected by the audience all contribute to the way a text will appear (Henderson 1995, 197). This leaves Henderson recognizing that analysis must happen on several levels.

Henderson finally asks, "What would a stylistic description/analysis of the Didache look like?" (Henderson 1995, 199). Though we can't necessarily be exhaustive, at least we can move toward an appropriate answer. Henderson explores whether a linguistic "codeswitching" model may be the appropriate way to evaluate changes in rhetorical style. Henderson evaluates codeswitching as it can be perceived in shifts between Greek and Hebrew/Aramaic styles, as well as shifts between quotation and avoidance of quotations (Henderson 1995, 201). Henderson details a number of passages of the New Testament in which the author interjects Hebraisms purposely and unexpectedly. These care conscious shifts intended to communicate something (Henderson 1995, 202). Henderson then goes on to describe the codeswitching in various Didache passages (Henderson 1995, 204ff). Henderson continues by emphasizing that, while the Didachist is perfectly able to quote freely from the Synoptic Gospels, he chooses not to do so at various points. This "non-quotation" is, in itself, a form of code switching (Henderson 1995, 205).

Henderson's conclusion is that style is not a static element, but that it is worked out in a literary (or oral) context (Henderson 1995, 208). He also finds it shifts, often with specific reasons and intentions (Henderson 1995, 209).  

​
0 Comments

Praise the Lord with Your Whole Life

5/10/2022

0 Comments

 
Tuesdays are for the Old Testament
5/10/22

Augustine. Exposition on the Book of Psalms. Schaff, Philip (editor). New York: Christian Literature Publishing Co, 1886. Nicene and Post-Nicene Church Fathers: Series 1: Volume VIII. Re-published 2014, Catholic Way Publishing. Kindle electronic edition, ISBN-13: 978-1-78379-372-3.
“Psalm 147"

Psalm 147:1 tells us, "Praise the Lord." Augustine understands this as the command from one God to all the church, no matter where they are (Augustine Psalms, loc. 342834, par. 1). The promised reward of verse one is that praise is good. Specifically, Augustine says, the particular form of praise known as a Psalm is good. He goes on to describe the particular instrument used for a Psalm, the psaltery (Augustine Psalms, loc. 342839, par. 2). As an instrument played with the hands, Augustine says the work of our hands should accompany our praise to God. Our praise is made pleasant in God's sight as we praise him with our voices and with a holy life (Augustine Psalms, loc. 342854, par. 3).

Who is this God, pleased by our praise? Augustine describes in brief, the way God in Scripture initiates a loving relationship with His people (Augustine Psalms, loc. 342865, par. 4). In verse three, God is described as the one who heals bruised hearts. Those who are not subject to pain might not be healed. But God does not fail to care for those who are hurting (Augustine Psalms, loc. 342870, par. 5). Augustine compares God to the physician and his treatment to the life we live in the Church.

Verse four describes God's ability, based on his exhaustive knowledge of all. He can name all the stars. Augustine concludes that he certainly knows all about his people and their trials (Augustine Psalms, loc. 342890, par. 8). The theme continues in verse five, as we speak of God's greatness.

Verse six changes our focus as God cares for the gentle. Augustine asks whether this is contradictory to God's power. It is not, since the Lord is the physician (Augustine Psalms, loc. 342924, par. 10). Verse seven then moves on to beginning with confession. Surprisingly, Augustine discusses the way one would confess sins but he doesn't make the connection between being gentle (humble) and confessing sins (Augustine Psalms, loc. 342929, par. 11). He does note that verses seven and eight return to the idea laid out at the beginning of the Psalm. With the clear conscience of confession, we praise the God who gives rain to nourish the earth (Augustine Psalms, loc. 342934, par. 12).

Augustine makes an interesting reference to a Scripture passage, "Let alms sweat in thy hand, till thou findest a righteous nam to whom to give it" (Augustine Psalms, loc. 342949, par. 13). I recall this from Didache 1.6, not from Scripture. Augustine takes the teaching to indicate that our planned giving should include setting aside some resources which we give to people whom we seek out, rather than to those who approach us. God is the owner of all, and sustains all (v. 9). He is certainly able to provide for his people and enable them to share generously.

Augustine allegorizes the remainder of verses nine and ten, taking the ravens to be his people who depend on him but the horses to be those people who are proud in their strength (Augustine Psalms, loc. 342970, par. 15). Verse eleven then pulls us back from the animal kingdom to God's love for people who hope in him.

Verse 12 calls all God's people, even in the captivity Augustine understands to be "Jerusalem" to praise God together (Augustine Psalms, loc. 342985, par. 17). Their hope, even in times of trouble, is tobe in the Lord who will make all trouble pass away. Augustine describes this hope at some length, drawing subsequent verses in as they picture the strong hope found in God. In verse 13 he strengthens the gates as a defense (Augustine Psalms, loc. 343019, par. 20). Verses 14-15 continue to speak of the Lord's ability to provide for his people. Augustine is clear that God does this through His Word, not only the written and spoken version, but Jesus, the Word incarnate (Augustine Psalms, loc. 343045, par. 23).

​
0 Comments

A Saving Curse

5/9/2022

0 Comments

 
5/9/22
Scholarly Reflections

Pardee, Nancy. "The Curse that Saves (Didache 16.5)." in Jefford, Clayton (editor). The Didache in Context: essays on its text, history, and transmission. Leiden: Brill, 1995, 156-176.

Pardee considers the word κατάθεμα as used in Didache 16.5 to be worthy of special study as it may provide insight into eschatology, soteriology, and Christology all at once (Pardee 1995, 156). She notes an irony by which a curse rescues from a curse, and observes that fire was typically used to destroy items considered accursed (Pardee 1995, 157). Pardee notes the study of the term cannot possibly confirm the identity of the curse, but that it can refine our understanding of possible referents (Pardee 1995, 158).

Pardee notes that the word group ἀνάθημα / ἀνάθεμα is commonly used, and refers in Thucydides and after for something set up, such as a person or thing designated for special service (Pardee 1995, 159). In Jewish and Christian usage it is specifically something which can serve as a negative example, so something accursed. Pardee reviews usage of ἀνάθημα as it appears in the Dead Sea Scrolls, since they are closer in time to the Didache than is the ancient Greek literature (Pardee 1995, 163)./ Pardee provides a number of passages and brief comments.

Pardee concludes that the ἀνάθεμα word group is not used in a negative sense earlier than the Septuagint. Usint it that way
outside of Judeo-Christian literature is rare and late" (Pardee 1995, 168). The word used in Didache 16.5, κατάθεμα, appears more rarely, and never has positive connotations (Pardee 1995, 169). In the end, Pardee concludes that the word is used clearly for a curse, and that this "curse itself" is most likely a veiled reference to Christ.


​
0 Comments

Burning? Purgatory?

5/6/2022

0 Comments

 
5/6/22
Scholarly Reflections

Milavec, Aaron. "The Saving Efficacy of the Burning Process in Didache 16.5." in Jefford, Clayton (editor). The Didache in Context: essays on its text, history, and transmission. Leiden: Brill, 1995, 131-155

The concept of a fire which purifies, a "purgatorial fire," is often thought to arise in the third century. However, Milavec takes it to be the concept of Didache 16.5 and not to be original in the work of the Didachist (Milavec 1995, 131).

The idea of a fire as judgment is common, especially within the New Testament. Yet Milavec does not find it applied to the individual believer as a means of purification from sin (Milavec 1995, 132). This concept was not codified in terms of purgatory until at least the 13th century. However, recent scholars suggest that purgatory is rooted not in particular biblical passages, but in early Judaic traditions (Milavec 1995, 133).

Didache 16.5-8 speaks of the coming judgment, which involves a burning which tests humans. Some remain faithful and become partakers of the resurrection. Then the Lord comes (Milavec 1995, 134). Milavec particularly evaluates the linguistic structure of Didache 16.5, as it is an obscure statement. "Those who have remained firm in their faith will be saved . . . by the curse itself" (Milavec 1995, 135). At issue is the identification of the curse. Milavec considers numerous possibilities but does not appear convinced that any can be stated with certainty.

Linguistic parallelism used in Didache 16.5 suggests to Milavec that "the curse" may well be the burning process (Milavec 1995, 137). The burning which tests all and which only some survive would rightly be seen as a curse to those who perish. In this instance, God's act of judgment may be referred to as "the curse." This view, though similar in wording, differs from a traditional interpretation that Jesus himself is "the accursed." 

Milavec explores the difficulty of considering alternative explanations of a concept once one explanation has become ingrained (Milavec 1995, 139). The assumption that "the curse itself" referred to Christ may have blocked out other possible explanations. Once it had been articulated by Harris and Harnack in the 1880s, the concept was seemingly permanently cemented in place (Milavec 1995, 140).

Milavec considers three difficulties with the interpretation. There is no clear evidence that the Didache was influenced by Galatians 3:13 or 1 Corinthians 12:3, so we do not know those passages were understood as apposite (Milavec 1995, 142). Further, the apparent diversity within early Christianity does not guarantee that different communities would understand being saved through a curse the same way as each other. This casts doubt on the interpretation that may have been intended (Milavec 1995, 143). Finally, there is not adequate internal evidence in Didache 16.5 to identify the referent of the curse. We simply cannot say from the text what it is speaking about (Milavec 1995, 144).

Fire is the prominent metaphor used in Didache 16.5, as the means of testing. Milavec explores fire as a metaphor (Milavec 1995, 145). Not only is it a means of judgment or testing, but we also find in Isaiah 33 that surviving fire is a sign of God's protective care. The righteous are unharmed, but the wicked are consumed. Malachi in particular uses fire as a sign of the process of refinement (Milavec 1995, 147). Fire therefore takes on the dual purpose of judging and refining. Milavec finds this to be a valid understanding of fire metaphors throughout the biblical and early Christian corpus (Milavec 1995, 150).

Milavec finally asks whether the Didachist was referring to one judgment in 16.5, then another at the end of the world. This question is made more significant by the possibility that there was once a longer ending to the Didache (Milavec 1995, 152). The current consensus is that the final judgment pictured by the Didachist occurs after the testing by fire.

​
0 Comments

"The Gospel of the Lord" and the Synoptic Gospels

5/5/2022

0 Comments

 
5/5/22
Scholarly Reflections

Tuilier, André. "La Didachè Et Le Problème Synoptique." in Jefford, Clayton (editor). The Didache in Context: essays on its text, history, and transmission. Leiden: Brill, 1995, 110-130.

Tuilier considers the Didache to be a possible source for some harmonization of the synoptic problem, as it appears to use material common to the Synoptists but not to John (Tuilier 1995, 110). He proceeds to detail synoptic references from Didache 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5a, 1.5b, 3.7, 6.2, 7.1 & 3, 8.2, 9.5, 10.5, 10.6, 11.7, 13.1, 16.1a, 16.1b, 16.3, 16.4a, 16.4b, 16.5a, and 16.6, 8 (Tuilier 1995, 111-117). Though the ideas are present, he observes that there is not identical word usage. Therefore, he does not consider the Didache to how a clear literary dependence. Tuilier concludes then that elements of the Didache, Matthew, and Luke depend on a Q source which the Didachist identifies as "the Gospel of the Lord" (Tuilier 1995, 118). Based on its content, this would seem to be a collection of the sayings of Jesus.

Tuilier further considers Luke to be a more literary derivative of Matthew, possibly, however, created with consultation of this Q source, which served as a primary source of the sayings of Jesus (Tuilier 1995, 120-121). The Didache does not appear to take notice of Mark, but does possibly recognize Matthew and Luke. Likewise, Mark appears to have a heavier influence from oral catechesis rather than a strong literary connection to other sources (Tuilier 1995, 121).

In subsequent studies, Tuilier notes that some authors considered The Gospel of the Hebrews or the Ebionite Gospel to represent authentic sources used by Matthew. Yet it is unreasonable to consider these as documents which were used in creation of the Synoptic Gospels, though they may have accurately conveyed some of the Jesus traditions from the early part of the 1st century (Tuilier 1995, 123).

Tuilier turns his attention to later works. Theodoret considered that Matthew took an Aramaic text which he may have used as a foundation for his Greek Gospel, and which may have been at least related to the Gospel of the Hebrews (Tuilier 1995, 125). Tuilier considers that it may be sensible to take this Aramaic text as the "Gospel of the Lord" referred to by the Didachist.

​
0 Comments

What Do We Intend to Accomplish with Moral Commands?

5/4/2022

0 Comments

 
5/4/22
Scholarly Reflections

Kloppenborg, John S. "The Transformation of Moral Exhortation in Didache 1-5." in Jefford, Clayton (editor). The Didache in Context: essays on its text, history, and transmission. Leiden: Brill, 1995, 88-109.

Kloppenborg notes that the Two Ways section of the Didache may have drawn the interest of scholars primarily because the concepts can be found in multiple other documents, thus allowing some of the types of comparative studies comon in scholarship regarding the Synoptic Gospels (Kloppenborg 1995, 88). Kloppenborg then reviews the comparative scholarship in brief. He considers there to be clear evidence for a literary relationship of the Didache, the Epistle of Barnabas, and Doctrina Apostolorum (Kloppenborg 1995, 90).

Of note to Kloppenborg is the fact that the Didache and Doctrina lays the dualism of the Two Ways out as simply a way of life and a way of death. This is a more moderate type of dualism than described in other versions, where they are seen as angelic influences for good or evil (Kloppenborg 1995, 93).  Kloppenborg describes the portrayals of the battling spirits of good and evil in some detail.

The Christian versions of the Two Ways documents contain relatively little material which is uniquely Christian (Kloppenborg 1995, 97). However, Kloppenborg notes the version in the Didache does show some traces of a move toward Christian tradition even outside of 1.3b-2.1, which is generally considered a specifically Christian interpolation (Kloppenborg 1995, 98). The commands for love, for instance, are positioned in a manner which suggests knowledge of Mark 12:30-31 and Matthew 22:37-39.

Kloppenborg notes that the Didache's use of commands against murder, adultery, theft, and false witness, in that order, reflect a knowledge of the text of Exodus 20, as well as Matthew 19:18. This statement also suggests that the Didachist was making an effort to produce authoritative moral teaching, drawing on a known authoritative document (Kloppenborg 1995, 100). 

The "holiness code" of Leviticus 19:18 (a command not to seek revenge or bear a grudge, but to love your neighbor) is presented along with the command to love God (Kloppenborg 1995, 102). Kloppenbor sees this as a strongly Christian decision, reflecting the New Testament pattern of presenting the commands to love God and the neighbor in conjunction with one another (Kloppenborg 1995, 103).

Didache 3:1-6 repeatedly addresses "my son." This pattern, like the others Kloppenborg has mentioned, appears in Doctrina but not in Barnabas, suggesting again that Doctrina but not Barnabas depended on the Didache (Kloppenborg 1995, 104).

Kloppenborg concludes that the Christian Two Ways deserves re-evaluation as an early and significant document. He sees it as "Christianized" largely by being used in a specifically Christian context (Kloppenborg 1995, 108).

​
0 Comments

Encourage Yourself, My Soul

5/3/2022

0 Comments

 
Tuesdays are for the Old Testament
5/3/22

Augustine. Exposition on the Book of Psalms. Schaff, Philip (editor). New York: Christian Literature Publishing Co, 1886. Nicene and Post-Nicene Church Fathers: Series 1: Volume VIII. Re-published 2014, Catholic Way Publishing. Kindle electronic edition, ISBN-13: 978-1-78379-372-3.
“Psalm 146"

Augustine takes Psalm 146:1 as a statement of a troubled soul reminding himself to praise the Lord. He sees this as the way we deal with troubles (Augustine Psalms, loc. 342702, par.1). Augustine then distinguishes between our soul and our body in terms of good works. Here he considers that even a warped and corrupted soul is superior to a body, because the body looks to itself but the soul is capable of looking to God (Augustine Psalms, loc. 342712, par. 2). For this reason, Augustine takes the exhortation to bless the Lord as coming from the Psalmist's soul. The response, then, from verse two, is that the soul will praise God in life, that is, in the context of the immortal soul (Augustine Psalms, loc. 342732, par. 2). The hope of the soul, to Augustine, comes from the anticipation of eternal life (Augustine Psalms, loc. 342737, par. 3).

In verse three, the trust of the Psalmist is not to be in earthly rulers. They are subject to weakness (Augustine Psalms, loc. 342742, par. 4). Again, despite the futility of trusting in man, we still fall into that trap all too easily. Rather than trusting in a man, who needs rescue just as we do, the man who trusts God is blessed (verse 5) (Augustine Psalms, loc. 342757, par. 5). Augustine goes on to say that the one we trust or follow is our hope. We are well advised to hope in the true God who made all things (v. 6). Augustine points out that this is a great hope, for God made everything, including us, and cares for it all. This is the consistent message of both the Old and New Testaments (Augustine Psalms, loc. 342783, par. 5).

One of the important ways that God takes care of the world is by gurading the truth and acting as the judge when people endure wrong (v. 7). Augustine describes this judgment in some deatil (Augustine Psalms, loc. 342793, par. 6). It is God who frees those bound wrongly and binds those who do wrong (Augustine Psalms, loc. 342808, par. 7). Augustine finally reminds us of the eternity of our hope, as the Lord reigns forever (v. 10). God is able to keep us in eternity (Augustine Psalms, loc. 342827, par. 7).
0 Comments

Description and Edition of the Coptic Didache Fragment

5/2/2022

0 Comments

 
5/2/22
Scholarly Reflections

Jones, F. Stanley, & Mirecki, Paul A. "Considerations on the Coptic Papyrus of the Didache (British Library Oriental Manuscript 9271)." in Jefford, Clayton (editor). The Didache in Context: essays on its text, history, and transmission. Leiden: Brill, 1995, 47-87.

Jones and Mirecki observe that the Coptic papyrus of Didache 10.3b-12.2a comes from an earlier date than the Jerusalem manuscript of the Didache and also antedates any Greek manuscript of Apostolic Constitutions. The challenge to schlars is that it contains a number of textual variants compared to these Greek manuscripts (Jones & Mirecki 1995, 47). The papyrus came to light in 1923 and was purchased by the British Museum. It was published in 1924 (Jones & Mirecki 1995, 48) and has since been published in slightly different editions twice (Jones & Mirecki 1995, 49). After close inspection in 1993 and 1994, Jones and Mirecki observed a number of small corrections, which they catalog in this article (Jones & Mirecki 1995, 49-50).

The English translation published in this article by Jones and Mirecki indicates chapter and verse divisions of the Didache. They provide notes which are intended to indicate lacunae and places where words are provided to deal with ellipsis (Jones & Mirecki 1995, 51).

Pages 52-57 provide Coptic and English of the three columns of manuscript, on facing pages. Following these pages is a textual commentary which analyzes the specific readings of Horner (Jones & Mirecki 1995, 1923), Schmidt (1925) and Lefort (1952) in comparison with the inspection and photographic record of Jones (1993-4). The analysis itself begins on page 59. Since I do not read Coptic I am unable to evaluate the comments in detail. However, the comparison of different editions appears to be quite detailed.

Jones and Mirecki continue with a detailed description of the papyrus sheet, its measurements, and the measurements and layout of the writing (Jones & Mirecki 1995, 70ff). The text appears to be written in two different sessions, judging from a difference in the pen and the darkness of the ink (Jones & Mirecki 1995, 72).

The piece of papyrus appears to be a part of a larger roll, possibly a leftover scrap used for practice purposes. This would also explain the apparent carelessness. It may have been used for practice rather than existing as part of a complete copy of a work (Jones & Mirecki 1995, 73). However, some debate has arisen as to whether this page may have been the end of a larger document (Jones & Mirecki 1995, 74ff). Jones and Mirecki suggest that this page may have been a practice sheet for a codex, rather than a roll. This would be more appropriate to the fifth century and could explain the spacing (Jones & Mirecki 1995, 78-79).

Jones and Mirecki briefly discuss the character of the text and its role in determining the text of the Didache. In general, this fragment has not been considered of great use in determining an underlying Greek text (Jones & Mirecki 1995, 84). The scribe appears to be experienced and reasonably careful, though this text is not a polished version (Jones & Mirecki 1995, 85). We do not know how freely the translation was made or whether it includes substantial liturgical commentary (Jones & Mirecki 1995, 86). For all these reasons, Jones and Mirecki consider the matter to remain open for debate and discussion.

​
0 Comments

May 2022 Newsletter

4/30/2022

0 Comments

 
Get your May 2022 Newsletter here! (It open a .pdf in a new window)
May 2022 Newsletter
0 Comments

Editorial Philosophy and Ancient Texts

4/29/2022

0 Comments

 
4/29/22
Scholarly Reflections

Dehandschutter, Boudewijn. "The Text of the Didache: Some Comments on the Edition of Klaus Wengst." in Jefford, Clayton (editor). The Didache in Context: essays on its text, history, and transmission. Leiden: Brill, 1995, 37-46.

Dehandschutter notes that, at least in some estimations, the Jerusalem manuscript of the Didache has been overvalued in the past. With some witness to the text in other versions, it may seem less accurate than once thought (Dehandschutter 1995, 37). This opinion came to a head when, in 1984, Klaus Wengst released an edition of the Didache incorporating about fifty text changes (Dehandschutter 1995, 38).

Dehandschutter considers the alterations to the text in Wengst's edition, as compared to the earlier accepted Bihlmeyer edition of the Didache (Dehandschutter 1995, 40ff). In numerous locations, Wengst has followed a reading in Apostolic Constitutions or the Apostolic Church Order. This allows for valid consideration of a Latin text as a corrective to a first century Greek text. On the whole, the Wengst text asks some provocative questions about the development of ideas leading to the current text of the Didache. 

​
0 Comments

A Recent Text Edition of the Didache

4/28/2022

0 Comments

 
4/28/22
Scholarly Reflections

Niederwimmer, Kurt. "Der Didachist Und Seine Quellen." in Jefford, Clayton (editor). The Didache in Context: essays on its text, history, and transmission. Leiden: Brill, 1995, 15-36.

Niederwimmer considers the overall nature of the text of the Didache, evaluating whether it may have been more like a series of notes of the nature of a draft or whether it is rightly considered a finished product. The text seems to have some elements of adopted tradition and other elements which may have come from current practices at the time of composition (Niederwimmer 1995, 16). Other elements may well be tied to various bits of Jesus traditions, either adapted from canonical Scriptures or from since lost writings or oral traditions (Niederwimmer 1995, 17). Niederwimmer indicates his various sources by means of abbreviations, mostly inserted in the margins and footnotes of his Greek text.

Prior to the text itself, Niederwimmer provides an extensive bibliography of sources for his manuscript study and the locations of parallel texts, allowing a scholarly reader to evaluate his analysis (Niederwimmer 1995, 19-21).

The Greek text itself begins on p. 22. Of particular interest to me for the purposes of my project is the material beginning at 7.1 (Niederwimmer 1995, 29). Unfortunately, while Niederwimmer cites numerous studies which refer to these passages, his footnotes cite secondary sources rather than going directly to the primary materials. Therefore, I note that it may be helpful to revisit pages 29-35, but not immediately.

​
0 Comments

A Recent Didache Translation

4/27/2022

0 Comments

 
4/27/22
Scholarly Reflections

Cody, Aelred. "The Didache: An English Translation." in Jefford, Clayton (editor). The Didache in Context: essays on its text, history, and transmission. Leiden: Brill, 1995, 3-14.

Cody introduces his translation of the Didache, observing that it is drawn from the Greek edition of Rordorf and Tuilier published in 1978 (Cody 1995, 3). In his presentation he marks emendations by Rordorf and Tuilier, as well as matter he has provided for clarification.

Cody's translation itself begins on p. 5. It is of interest that he routinely translates ἔθνοι as "nations" rather than the traditional interpretation of "gentiles."

In 10.3 he adds "Jesus" to "through your servant," gathering it from the Coptic and making it parallel with 9.2, 3; 10.2 (Cody 1995, 10). In 11.5a, Cody adds that, "He shall stay <only> one day," making sense of the μὴ, by insertion of εἰ as the Ethiopic version would suggest. This also creates consistency with 12.2 and avoids say, "He shall not stay one day" (Cody 1995, 11).

Cody's translation is accurate and lucid. He avoids arcane and confusing language throughout.

​
0 Comments

All Praise to the Lord God

4/26/2022

0 Comments

 
Tuesdays are for the Old Testament
4/26/22

Augustine. Exposition on the Book of Psalms. Schaff, Philip (editor). New York: Christian Literature Publishing Co, 1886. Nicene and Post-Nicene Church Fathers: Series 1: Volume VIII. Re-published 2014, Catholic Way Publishing. Kindle electronic edition, ISBN-13: 978-1-78379-372-3.
“Psalm 145"

Augustine observes the type of praise given in Psalm 145:1 is appropriate to be given to God. He therefore takes the reference to David to speak allegorically of Christ (Augustine Psalms, loc. 342539, par. 1). The praise is due to God every day forever (v. 2).

Psalm 145speaks of the scope of God's praise. Augustine observes that it is limitless, according to verses 3-4. It is neither bounded by space or time, but extends everywhere and throughout all generations (Augustine Psalms, loc. 342554, par. 3).

Verses 5-7 speak to the content of the praise due to God - his works and his character (Augustine Psalms, loc. 342569, par. 4). The worship of God rightly focuses on God, not on anything in the created order. Augustine describes the praise to God as a means of growing in understanding and experiencing God's blessings (Augustine Psalms, loc. 342584, par. 5).

Verses 8-9 speak of God's mercy and compassion. Augustine asks what we actually deserve, especially those who have despised God (Augustine Psalms, loc. 342589, par. 7). Yet he recognizes that God's mercy brings his gracious compassion to all those who turn to him. God is severe against those who reject him but merciful to those who hope in him (Augustine Psalms, loc. 342604, par. 8). Augustine continues by elaborating on the order of all creation, by which all creatures, according to their nature and ability, give the appropriate honor to God. This is often by showing their beauty or their usefulness (Augustine Psalms, loc. 342635, par. 11). 

Verse 14 cndidly admits that godly people fall. Sometimes it is into poverty, sometimes into some other shame. But in all thins the Lord strengthens them (Augustine Psalms, loc. 342659, par. 13). At the right time, though not always when we first desire, God gives his people their needed food and blesses them (vv. 15-16). Verse 17 describes this as God's righteousness at work.

Those who call on God find he is near (v. 18). Augustine does note that the call on God must be in truth, not an effort to manipulate God (Augustine Psalms, loc. 342679, par. 16). God gives us what is good. In turn, we praise him. This adjusts our will so that, in verse 19, we find God gives us what we desire (Augustine Psalms, loc. 342689, par. 17).

In the end, in verses 20-21, God rewards the righteous and punishes sinners.

​
0 Comments

Eschatology, Didache 16, and Authorial Interest

4/25/2022

0 Comments

 
4/25/22
Scholarly Reflections

Balabanski, Vicky. "Chapter Six: Didache 16 as a Develoopment in Christian Eschatology." Eschatology in the Making: Mark, Matthew, and the Didache. Cambridge: University Press, 1997, 180-205.

Christian eschatology was not only expressed in the biblical texts. Balabanski considers Didache 16 as an example of eschatological development in early Christianity (Balabanski 1997, 180). After presenting the text of the chapter in Greek and in English, Balabanski observes that the consensus of scholars is that Matthew 24 and Didache 16 likely have a common literary source.

Biblical critics tend to see the relationship in terms of the Didachis drawing on source material but with an awareness of the finished version of one or more Synoptic Gospel. The references to synoptic material tend to be allusions rather than quotations (Balabanski 1997, 186). Balabanski makes substantial use of the work of W.-D. Köhler in this regard.

Balabanski asks whether the overall structure and the logical patterns of Didache 16 might show a clear influence from Matthew 24 (Balabanski 1997, 191). The opening passage of each shows an emphasis on paraenesis. Both texts show an interest in the community as a whole (Balabanski 1997, 192). After this point, however, around Matthew 24:15 and Didache 16:4c, the parallel structure is less clear. However, Balabanski continues to find conceptual and structural elements which suggest a knowledge of Matthew 24 (Balabanski 1997, 194).

Köhler further argues that the Didache frequently draws on traditions which are not found in Synoptic materials (Balabanski 1997, 195). Balabanski questions the use of a common source in this case, as it would lead to the question of why each author selected different elements to use while consulting the same source (Balabanski 1997, 196).

In the end, Balabanski understands the Didache as an attempt to comment on current situations, using text and ideas from the Gospels but not as any attempt to rplace them. Therefore, ideas could be drawn from many sources, and it would not be necessary to provide every logical detail. "Its very selectivity presupposes the continued use of the Gospel, and implies that its function was to serve as an adjunct" (Balabanski 1997, 197, emphasis hers). To explore this idea Balabanski evaluates the idea of Didache 16 on the basis of the interest of different passages. For instance, the passage opens with a command to "watch." This watching is not in order to notice the Lord's coming, but to be careful of one's way of life. Both meanings can be found in the biblical texts (Balabanski 1997, 198). The interpetation here suggests the Didache does not take a primary interest in an unexpected second coming of Christ.

​
0 Comments

Matthew 24 and the Hope of the End

4/22/2022

0 Comments

 
4/22/22
Scholarly Reflections

Balabanski, Vicky. "Chapter Five: Matthew 24: Eschatological Expectation after the Jewish War." Eschatology in the Making: Mark, Matthew, and the Didache. Cambridge: University Press, 1997, 135-179.

Balabanski observes that Matthew's eschatological material in chapters 24-25 appears to be a significant expansion of the material that many assume to be adapted from Mark (Balabanski 1997, 135). In addition to Matthew 24-25, some scholars consider chapter 23 to be part of the same discourse, though some separate it because of a different stated setting and audience. 

Balabanski finds a parallel move in Matthew 13, where Jesus leaves the crowds who don't understand him well, in order to teach his disciples, who grasp the message somewhat better. For this reason, Balabanski takes Matthew 23 to be a part of the topic of chapters 24-25, with a slight shift in hearers but not in the message (Balabanski 1997, 137). The scope of the passage then suggests that a true view of eschatology is tied to ethical teaching and appears in distinction to the vies and practices of the "outsiders" such as the scribes and Pharisees (Balabanski 1997, 138).

Having identified Matthew 23-25 as eschatological in nature, Balabanski notes that by sheer volume Matthew has a greater emphasis on eschatology than do the other Synoptics (Balabanski 1997, 139). She then proceeds to step through features of Matthew's eschatological vision as described by G. Bornkamm. The message of John the Baptist, the Sermon on the Mount, and much of the parabolic and other teaching of Jesus point to a preparation for the end of the world.

The purpose of Matthew's eschatology may be made clear by a brief conclusion of parables found in Matthew 13:51-52. Here, the wise householder brings old and new things out of his storehouse (Balabanski 1997, 143). This could well suggest that wise teachers, those who follow Jesus' view of the kingdom of heaven, bring ideas out wisely and at the appropriate times. Some ideas are not fitting for some occasions and will keep. Some need to b brought out and applied immediately (Balabanski 1997, 144).

The kingdom of heaven, in Matthew, is seen as both present and future in nature. There have been apocalyptic signs which indicate God's kingdom is here. Yet there is still a future hope. Balabanski and others find a possible shift in thought, that at first Christians saw the kingdom primarily as future, but then later considered it to be already realized (Balabanski 1997, 148). In Christian thought as well as some Jewish sthought Balabanski finds the idea of God's kingdom infiltrating aspects of this world, not working a miraculous rescue to those in trouble, but enabling them to deal with their troubles (Balabanski 1997, 151).

Another significant question pertaining to eschatology is that of chronology. Balabanski asks if we can discern a sequence of events in Matthew 24 (Balabanski 1997, 153). Matthew clearly expects false prophets to be present at the time of the end. Balabanski recognizes that there could certainly have been false prophets and miracle workers in the Matthean community's experience (Balabanski 1997, 154). There is also mention of a tie of trouble, a mission to Gentiles, then the end. Because "the end" is mentioed in the middle of Matthew 24, before other signs, Balabanski considers that there may be two separate sequences present, running at the same time. She draws a timeline of sorts, noting that the Matthean community is in the middle of the course of events, and interpreting the coming Jewish War of 66-70 as the end (Balabanski 1997, 156ff). Balabanski ultimately concludes that the two sequences can be harmonized and that material in Matthew's account but not in Mark's came either as an explanation to the Markan account or from some other tradition available to Matthew but not to Mark.

Balabanski's two-tradition cncept is novel. However, she does note that other works, such as Revelation, use multiple ocncurrent chronologies. She also cites 19th century commentator J.P. Lange, who identified three cycles of events progressing concurrently in Matthew 24 (Balabanski 1997, 166-167). Balabanski suggests that the concurrent cycles in Revelation may well serve a literary fun ction of delay and suspense, leading the hearer more clearly to the concept of patient endurance in light of Jesus' eventual promised return (Balabanski 1997, 169).

Balabanski observes that the vivid eschatological hope in Matthew suggests an earlier composition in comparison to Mark. However, rather than suggest an earlier date and a lack of dependence on Mark, she suggests we find a more nuanced understanding of the nature of an eschatological hope (Balabanski 1997, 175). She suggests that while Jewish eschatological writings reflecting on the war of 66-70 view the destruction as punishment for sin, Matthew sees it as God's way of delivering the kingdom tho those who are worthy (Balabanski 1997, 178). This would explain the maintenance of a vivid hope over time.

​
0 Comments

Extrabiblical Flight Tradition and Mark 13

4/21/2022

0 Comments

 
4/21/22
Scholarly Reflections

Balabanski, Vicky. "Chapter Four: The Judean Flight Oracle (Mark 13:14FF) and the Pella Flight Tradition." Eschatology in the Making: Mark, Matthew, and the Didache. Cambridge: University Press, 1997, 101-134.

Balabanski previously considered whether Mark 13 had adopted a Judaean tradition involving flight in the face of persecution. In this chapter she evaluates such a tradition, "a flight by Jerusalem Christians to Pella prior to the Jewish War" (Balabanski 1997, 101). This tradition is conveyed to us by Eusebius and Epiphanius.

The text of Mark 13:14 does speak of fleeing to the mountains. This can easily lead a reader to the tradition that "an oracle given prior to the Jewish War led Jerusalem Christians to flee the city and settle in the Transjordanian city of Pella and the surrounding region of Perea" (Balabanski 1997, 103). However, it is possible to question the relationship. The chronology in Mark is not precise, nor is the actual location mentioned, while Eusebius gives a very specific statement of time and place (Balabanski 1997, 104).

Upon evaluation of Eusebius' description of the flight oracle (Hist. eccle. 3.7) with Luke's material, Balabanski concludes that Eusebius was speaking of an oracle presented to Jerusalem at the time of the Jewish War, while the synoptic material applied more generally to Judea (Balabanski 1997, 106). Because Eusebius has a tendency to apply biblical accounts to particular events in history, his separation of these two accounts is significant. He apparently didn't invent the Pella tradition. If he had done so, he would have assigned it to the setting of Luke 20 (Balabanski 1997, 107).

Epiphanius refers in three places to a flight to Pella. After providing the three texts in Greek and English, Balabanski discusses the challenging nature of the relationship of the two authors. Epiphanius is clear in the connection among this flight, Pella, and the Ebionite heresy, while Eusebius does not make that connection (Balabanski 1997, 111). Balabanski concludes that both Eusebius and Epiphanius had access to different sources of information from which they gathered their accounts (Balabanski 1997, 112).

Considering the relationship of Mark 13 and Luke 20, Balabanski concludes that Luke adapted the material from Mark, recasting the delivery of the message into a more public setting (Balabanski 1997, 113). She considers it unlikely that Luke would have access to a flight oracle such as we have recorded in Eusebius and Epiphanius. Further, an argument that Mark's material is based on a displacement which was caused by the Jewish war is uncertain. The statements in Mark are not clear enough to make a conclusive link with a specific situation (Balabanski 1997, 114). Balabanski discusses a number of elements in turn, comparing Mark 13 and Eusebius (Balabanski 1997, 115ff).

A significant factor in discussing a flight from Jerusalem is whether, in fact, it would be possible to flee Jerusalem at all (Balabanski 1997, 122). If the phrase translated "the abomination of desolation" refers to something done by Titus the time frame is relatively clear (Balabanski 1997, 122). However, it is not clear what this is, so we are not able to tie the event t o a particular attack on Jerusalem. Josephus, in his Jewish Wars, is of the strong opinion that this event occurred at the time of Titus. Yet this is not a guarantee of a correct interpretation (Balabanski 1997, 126). Balabanski reviews Josephus' argument that revolutionary activities led to a desecration in the Jewish War. The situation would clearly have been difficult for Jewish Christians. Yet it is not certain that this was the one specific situation addressed in Mark 13 (Balabanski 1997, 130). 

​
0 Comments

Mark 13 and a Living Hope

4/20/2022

0 Comments

 
4/20/22
Scholarly Reflections

Balabanski, Vicky. "Chapter Three: Mark 13: Eschtological Expectation and the Jewish War." Eschatology in the Making: Mark, Matthew, and the Didache. Cambridge: University Press, 1997, 55-100.

Balabanski observes there has been no shortage of study and commentary on Mark 13 in recent years (Balabanski 1997, 55). Likewise, a multitude of methods of interpretation has been used. Balabanski reviews some of the approaches to interpretation briefly before concluding that Mark 13 is best considered first as a coherent literary unit, then as a result of gathered traditions and redaction (Balabanski 1997, 57).

From a literary standpoint, Balabanski finds Mark 13 to serve as a climax in Jesus' dealing with the temple. At the start of the chapter he is leaving the temple and describes its destruction, while also urging his disciples to see and understand the situation (Balabanski 1997, 59). The anticipation of the temple's destruction sets the scene for the remainder of the chapter. Balabanski notes that the perpective of Jesus, as shown in chapter 13, is that the destruction of the temple will be God's doing (Balabanski 1997, 60). The world is not going to be centered on God's presence in the temple, but in other places. The "way of the cross" as opposed to the temple will be the means of salvation. It is significnt to Balabanski that Jesus, in this discourse, addresses the disciples who seemed most troubled by his announcement of his coming death (Balabanski 1997, 61). To add to the emphasis, Mark removes the voice of the narrator and presents Jesus' discourse and dialogue in a way not done elsewhere in Mark (Balabanski 1997, 62).

Balabanski continues by commenting on the correspondence of themes in Mark 13 and in other portions of Mark, particularly those of Jesus' passion to come, along with the call of God to remain aware and fruitful as we await the eschaton.

Above all, from a literary standpoint, Balabanski sees Mark 13 as providing a break from the narrative which is driving toward Jesus' passion. In this break the reader is given insight into the eschatological perspective of Jesus, thus enabling him to make sense of the death of Christ and the scattering of his disciples (Balabanski 1997, 69).

As regards form and genre, Balabanski notes that Mark 13 is not strictly speaking an apocalypse. It does have some of the features, but overall it is more akin to a farewell discourse (Balabanski 1997, 71). Balabanski continues with a detailed structural analysis of the chapter (Balabanski 1997, 72ff). This analysis leads her into a survey of the chronology of the events (Balabanski 1997, 75ff). While the passage does have a general chronological flow, Balabanski does not take the specific statements to be  predictor of successive events (i.e., wars, earthquakes, famines, persecutions, sacrilege, etc in that order) (Balabanski 1997, 75-76).

Balabanski considers source and redactional issues in Mark 13 to be important, especially as she views the chapter to be important in the overall dating of the Gospel (Balabanski 1997, 77ff). She evaluates the statements in detail as compared to Matthew, Luke, and the postulated Q source. In addition, she considers in particular W. Ong's work on orality, which suggests the material used in the chapter may well have been drawn from knowledge of an oral source (Balabanski 1997, 82ff).

Balabanski next entertains the possibility that Mark 13:14ff may have had a Judaean apocalyptic source. Several key word and ideas are ot parallelled elsewhere in the New Testament (Balabanski 1997, 89). She finds more similarities to passages referencing political upheaval than to eschatological writings. After removing the verses which Balabanski attribues to a Judaean apocalyptic source, the remain verses (7, 8, 17, 19, 20, 24-27) suggest to her a different apocalyptic source which is descriptive, uses repetitive language, and is more strongly chronological than the passage as it now stands (Balabanski 1997, 93).

The overall context of the passage suggests to Balabanski that a flight such as described in Mark 13:14ff has already happened and that the community contains Judaean Christians who have been driven out of Judea (Balabanski 1997, 97-98). Balabanski takes this event to be in a time during or after the first Jewish War (possibly after 70 AD), and further that the Marcan community was likely in Syria, distant frm that war (Balabanski 1997, 98). The departure from a philosophy that the temple is necessary and central to worship also suggests a post-70 date to Balabanski (Balabanski 1997, 99). Balabanski finds in Mark 13 a strong eschatological hope. She also sees that there is a concern that teachers not distract from the way of the cross, but rather focus on day to day Christian living, keeping the hope at some point in the future (Balabanski 1997, 100).

​
0 Comments

God Overcoming the Goliath of Sin

4/19/2022

0 Comments

 
Tuesdays are for the Old Testament
4/19/22

Augustine. Exposition on the Book of Psalms. Schaff, Philip (editor). New York: Christian Literature Publishing Co, 1886. Nicene and Post-Nicene Church Fathers: Series 1: Volume VIII. Re-published 2014, Catholic Way Publishing. Kindle electronic edition, ISBN-13: 978-1-78379-372-3.
“Psalm 144"

Augustine takes Psalm 144 to speak of God's use of David to overcome Goliath. He particularly mentions the overthrow of Goliath as the devil, and notes that he was defeated using his own weapons (Augustine Psalms, loc. 342438, par. 1).

The body of Christ, in some way, is trained by God for battle. Verse one refers to fingers, which can operate separately and together, showing the unity and diversity in the body of Christ (Augustine Psalms, loc. 342443, par. 2). The warfare we engage in, according to Augustine's reckoning, is that of using mercy and charity to overcome evil. God is seen as our mercy, the one who rescues us. We therefore receive mercy and do good (Augustine Psalms, loc. 342453, par. 3). 

In verse three, the Psalmist wonders at the idea that God has made himself known to man (Augustine Psalms, loc. 342458, par. 4). God has valued man so highly that Christ would give himself for us. This is a very high value, especially considering man's nature, passing away (v. 4) (Augustine Psalms, loc. 342463, par. 5).

Verses 5-7 call out to God for a relatively dramatic rescue, with smoke, lightning, and arrows, as he pulls us out of the waters (Augustine Psalms, loc. 342474, par. 6). Augustine observes numerous instances of God reaching to the earth in a way which we might consider dramatic. He is taking action against those who reject him. Those people speak vanity against the Lord and will be defeated (Augustine Psalms, loc. 342493, par. 7).

In verse 10 we are reminded once again that this God is the one who redeems kings, even David. Augustine speaks of David as allegorically referring to Christ, here Christ's body, the Church, which he redeems from all sin, even from the sword (Augustine Psalms, loc. 342504, par. 8). Verse 12 speaks to the intergenerational work of God, as the sons of the Church become part of the Church (Augustine Psalms, loc. 342514, par. 9). These people will have abundance and joy (vv. 13-14). Their years shall not fil, an idea which reminds Augustine of the nature of their life - eternal. Verse 15 calls these blessed people, the people of God (Augustine Psalms, loc. 342529, par. 10).
0 Comments

The Bridegroom's Delay

4/18/2022

0 Comments

 
4/18/22
Scholarly Reflections

Balabanski, Vicky. "Chapter Two: Matthew 25:1-13 as a Window on Eschatological Change." Eschatology in the Making: Mark, Matthew, and the Didache. Cambridge: University Press, 1997, 42-54.

Balabanski takes the delayed return of the bridegroom in the parable of the maidens (Matthew 25:1-13) to be a significant motif in our eschatological understanding (Balabanski 1997, 24). She finds numerous interpretive challenges worthy of explanation. These challenges have inspired comment in the past, and Balabanski coniders the nature of the comments to be a significant means of evaluating the interpretive philosophies in play. Some look at the details so as to identify a cultural setting, while others consider the details to be primarily allegorical in nature. A third pattern "sees the parable as having been shaped by the early church, but having as its basis a genuine dominical utterance" (Balabanski 1997, 25). Balabanski evaluates this third pattern on the basis of the work of Puig i Tàrrech (Balabanski 1997, 26).

Puig i Tàrrech constructs a theory that the author has drawn numerous small elements from Q material as represented in the other Synoptic Gospels so as to create this parable which appears only in Matthew (Balabanski 1997, 26). Balabanski finds this schema to be more convincing than the other modes of interpretation, which attempt to treat the parable as a whole (Balabanski 1997, 27).

The episode of delay in the parable may raise valid issues of the delay of a parousia as a concern to the community surrounding Matthew's Gospel (Balabanski 1997, 28). Puig i Tàrrech postulates a small but influential group in the Matthean community which would have been troubled by the fact that Christians die while we await the parousia. This would have led to insertion of the master's delay in this parable (Balabanski 1997, 29). Balabanski suggests that the particular schema proposed is overly complex and that it is easier to consider the material which could be allegorical as a "pre-Matthean interpolation" (Balabanski 1997, 29). 

The work of G. Bornkamm addresses verse 5-7a as pre-Matthean (Balabanski 1997, 29). The motifs of sleeping/waking and the setting in the middle of the night can both be seen as redactional but can effectively be considered as unified in their significance. Balabanski considers the word ἐνύσταξαν from verse five to be a non-Matthean feature primarily due to its rarity, being used only twice in the New Testament, once in Matthew and once in 2 Peter (Balabanski 1997, 30-31). The concept of the middle of the night can also be considered as a replacement for the early evening setting which would be more conducive to the use of torches. This suggests to Blabanski that the passage is intended to evoke images of a parousia, normally pictured as a nocturnal event (Balabanski 1997, 32).

The cry in the night which alerts the maidens is a subject of some debate. Balabanski takes it to be a Messianic summons, which action does have biblical parallels (Balabanski 1997, 34). The cry does not appear to be a call to battle or a summons to judgment, but a call to gather, issued to the crowd as a whole (Balabanski 1997, 35).

The motif of the coming of the bridegroom strikes Balabanski as significant especially due to the difference in wording between verses one and six. Verse one uses ὑπάντησιν while verse six uses ἀπάντησιν. Balabanski observes that Matthew's style "prefers repetition and consistency rather than stylistic variation" (Balabanski 1997, 37). For this reason she suggests a different source.

The motif which overshadows the entire parable is the delay of the bridegroom (Balabanski 1997, 38). The verb used for delay is found in various eschatological passages. Within the New Testament, "behind each of these passages is the implicit acknowledgement that the expected χρόνος differs from the actual χρόνος" (Balabanski 1997, 39). The community would therefore recognize the concept of delay and identify it with eschatology.

Balabanski considers whether the hypothetical insertion resolves challenges of the passage, as well as whether the passage without the alleged insertion makes sense (Balabanski 1997, 40). Her conclusion is that the material she views as inserted does resolve some of the challenges. The parable also is a sensible narrative even without the possibly inserted material. For these reasons, she feels free to consider the eschatological ideas an insertion (Balabanski 1997, 41-45 passim). Because the interpolated ideas may not be entirely internally consistent with the experience of any one Christian community, Balabanski takes them to come from multiple interpolators (Balabanski 1997, 46).

Balabanski further identifies Matthew 25:10c-13 as being drawn from Q material and being appended to the material central to the parable (Balabanski 1997, 46).

Verses 5-7 of Matthew 25 suggest an end result to the theological struggles caused by a delayed parousia (Balabanski 1997, 48). The passage, in Balabanski's view, is an attempt to explain the delay of the parousia without minimizing divine sovereignty (Balabanski 1997, 49). The fact of a distinction between groups of maidens suggests a time when some of the first generation of Christians have died but some are still alive (Balabanski 1997, 50). This reality can also be reflected in the parable's use of words for sleep, which could be allegorically aplied either to death or to a spiritual drowsiness (Balabanski 1997, 52). Finally, Balabanski considers the midnight return to indicate that while the parousia is not to be expected immediately, it is still within a concrete time period rathr than being somewhere in the vague and distant future (Balabanski 1997, 53).

​
0 Comments

How Does Eschatological Thought Develop?

4/15/2022

0 Comments

 
4/15/22
Scholarly Reflections

Balabanski, Vicky. "Chapter One: An Imminent End? Models for understanding eschatological development in the first century." Eschatology in the Making: Mark, Matthew, and the Didache. Cambridge: University Press, 1997, 4-23.

Balabanski observes that the first century eschatological hope was not static in nature, but changed over time. The delay of the parousia certainly caused a theological problem. This disappointment has been taken in modern scholarship as a major factor in theological development (Balabanski 1997, 4). Balabanski notes that modern scholarship has occasionally gone so far as to suggest that Jesus expected the kingdom of God to be an eschatological kingdom which would be relized within a generation. If this was the case, what would Christians do when Jesus was proven to be wrong (Balabanski 1997, 5)? 

Much modern scholarship proceeded to frame the development of theology as motivated by eschatological disappointment. At the same time, some scholars observed that the New Testament shows no bitter disappointment concerning the delay in the parousia (Balabanski 1997, 8). Some, such as C.H. Dodd, understood Jesus to be speaking of an eschatology which included a present reality.

Balabanski reviews three recent scholarly works which question the thesis of an eschatological crisis. D.E. Aune considers that a future eschatological hope was never the basis for salvation (Balabanski 1997, 10). Because there was no clearly stated time to expect the parousia, the delay would not create a crisis. It would also not require the eschatological hope to become less vivid (Balabanski 1997, 12). The decline in eschatological expectation, in Aune's mind, could be explained by a gradual replacement of that hope by a confidence in immortality after death (Balabanski 1997, 13).

R.J. Bauckham considers the delay of the parousia to present the same problem for Christianity which it had long presented in Judaism (Balabanski 1997, 124). An essential element was the belief that there were good reasons for the delay, and that at least some suggestions of reasons could be found in the Scriptures. In particular, from an interpretive standpoint, Bauckham notes in the late first century A.D. that commentators saw God's longsuffering as a motive for him to delay pouring out judgment on the earth (Balabanski 1997, 15). In Christian thought, the time of delay provides opportunity for Christians to identify with the sufferings of Jesus (Balabanski 1997, 16). Revelation pictures God's restraint, as in chapter seven four angels are protecting the earth from winds of judgment. Chapter 10 further pictures a delay of judgment so as to allow for witness to God's goodness (Balabanski 1997, 17).

B.J. Malina considers the idea of changes in time erception in different historical and cultural contexts. He takes first century Palestinian people to generally understand events in relation to their present situation, while modern Americans tend to look to the possible future implications (Balabanski 1997, 18-19). Balabanski thinks Malina's use of the data presents an overly simple and uniform picture of cultural thought, in which the first century Christians would take no thought to the past or future. This is an unlikely simplification of complex humans.

Rather than follow the procedures which Balabanski has described, her study will be based on a comparative analysis of Mark 13, Matthew 24, and Didache 16, after a study of Matthew 25:1-3, in order to evaluate eschatological thought as it may have existed prior to final redaction of Matthew (Balabanski 1997, 22).

​
0 Comments

Downright Apocalyptic

4/14/2022

0 Comments

 
4/14/22
Scholarly Reflections

Lindemann, Andreas. "Die Endzeitrade in Didache 1 und Die Jesus-Apokalypse in Mattaus 24-25." Sayings of Jesus: Canonical and Non-Canonical edited by Petersen, William, L. Leiden: Brill, 1997, pp. 155-174.

Lindemann briefly surveys theories regarding the apocalyptic chapter 16 of the Didache, whether it is the work of the composer of chapters 1-6, the "two ways" material, or whether it may have been developed by a later redactor. While this question is not satisfactorily resolved, there is also a valid question of the relation of this material to the little apocalypse of Matthew 24 (Lindemann 1997, 156).

Of particular interest to Lindemann is the transition into the apocalyptic passages. Matthew moves into the material from an allegorical parable, while the Didache makes the transitio by stating it comes from "the gospel of our Lord" (15:4) (Lindemann 1997, 158). The metaphoric language at the start of each refers to the attention which must be given to a light. Both passages call for vigilance. Lindemann observes additional similarities in the formulaic language in use (Lindemann 1997, 159). This is particularly apparent too Lindemann if, as he assumes, the apocalyptic portion of the Didache originally followed on the heels of the Two Ways material. Lindemann particularly notes the emphasis on the "last days" and the apperance of false prophets (Lindemann 1997, 160-162). Lindemann continues making cmparisons of the vocabulary and the thematic emphases of the material, including the presence of trumpets, a resurrection, and the endurance of the saints.

Lindemann observes the slightly abrupt ending of the Didache text, which suggests to some that the copyist expected to append more (Lindemann 1997, 169). Suggstions that the end could be found in Const. Ap. 7 still do not explain the abrupt ending. Lindemann does observe that the parousia has more adequate conclusions in 1 Thessalonians 4, 1 Corinthians 15, and 2 Corinthians 4-5 (Lindemann 1997, 171). ​
0 Comments

Passing Along Traditions

4/13/2022

0 Comments

 
4/13/22
Scholarly Reflections

McDonald, James I.H. "Chapter Four: Paradosis." Kerygma and Didache: The Articulation and Structure of the earliest Christian message. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980, 101-125.

Tradition was an important element of Greek culture as well as of Hebrew culture. McDonald notes that the difference had to do with the Hebrew concept of a particular divine revelation which was to be passed on. In contrast, Greeks who learned to read would memorize poetry which could inculcate social and cultural values (McDonald 1980, 101). While Greek learning of texts was often done and passed on through memorization and oral tradition, the Hebrew paradosis emphasized the fact that Torah was a written source (McDonald 1980, 102). In Hebrew thought, McDonald finds an interest in preserving the specific wording of Torah. At the same time there is an expectation that the student should grow in an ability to describe and explain the significance of passages learned (McDonald 1980, 104).

Jesus stood at the intersection of two worlds. McDonald notes that he was involved in the life of Hebrew paradosis but that he was also the source of a new type, or at least a new genre of content, the tradition passed on in Christianity (McDonald 1980, 104). McDonald describes a number of passages in which Jesus taught his disciples so they could themselves pass on meaningful traditions. Jesus appears to us as a rabbi instructing his disciples. This instruction would naturally have been intended to be transmitted to future generations (McDonald 1980, 106).

Within early Christian practice McDonald notes that Jesus taught his followers a reinterpretation of their former understanding of Scripture, now seen through the resurrection (McDonald 1980, 107). Particular matters of discussion within early Christianity can be identified as significant in first century paradosis. McDonald notes the central importance of Jerusalem and the Twelve apostles in relation to Jerusalem (McDonald 1980, 108-109). At the same time, the way theological tradition was played out in different places showed variety. McDonald notes, for example, the distinctions among Judaean and Hellenistic Christians, along with the additional ethnic grups as Christianity spread (McDonald 1980, 110 ff). This does not indicate to McDonald a difference in the underlying themes of Christianity. It remained at its core the message of the specificgospel work of Jesus (McDonald 1980, 112).

Paul's use of paradosis is a bit different, as McDonald identifies a strongly rabbinic custom, used in a positive way to guide people to Christ (McDonald 1980, 112). McDonald reviews various passages to show how Paul takes tradition and uses it with Christ as the central character to be passed from one generation to another. McDonald also notes that Paul occasionally claims that a piece of teaching derives directly from the Lord. McDonald considers that some of these statements are known quotations while others are of less clear derivation (McDonald 1980, 116).McDonald considers many of these statements and how they may well be a Pauline statement of a principle illustrated by but never spoken clearly by Jesus (McDonald 1980, 118). 

​
0 Comments
<<Previous

    ​Help Fuel This Ministry by Clicking Here!

    All the work of Wittenberg Door Campus Ministry, including this blog, is supported by the generosity of people like you. Please consider joining our team of prayer and financial supporters. Read more here!
    Please Note: The opinions presented in blog posts are not necessarily those of Wittenberg Door Campus Ministry. Frequently we report on contrary views, often without comment. Please chime in on the discussion.

    About Throwing Inkwells

    When Martin Luther was dealing with struggles in his life he once saw what appeared to be an angelic being. Not trusting that he was going to be informed by someone other than the God revealed in Scripture, he took the appearance to be untrustworthy and hurled his inkwell at it. The chipped place in the plaster wall is still visible at the Wartburg Castle, though apparently the ink stain on the wall has been refreshed periodically by the caretaker.

    Blog Feeds

    RSS Feed

    Want to keep up with what's happening at Wittenberg Door? Subscribe to our mailing list!

    Categories

    All
    1 Corinthians
    1 John
    1 Kings
    1 Peter
    1 Samuel
    1 Thessalonians
    1 Timothy
    2019-02-feb
    2 Chronicles
    2 Corinthians
    2-john
    2 Kings
    2 Peter
    2 Samuel
    2 Thessalonians
    2 Timothy
    3-john
    Academic-success
    Acts
    Advent 1
    Advent-1-a
    Advent-1b
    Advent-1c
    Advent 2
    Advent-2-a
    Advent-2b
    Advent-2c
    Advent 3
    Advent-3-a
    Advent-3b
    Advent-3c
    Advent 4
    Advent-4-a
    Advent-4b
    Advent-4c
    Alesso-2009
    Alexander 1999
    Allitt-2010
    All Saints' Day
    Alon 1996
    Amos
    Anunciation
    Apostolical Constitutions
    Aristotle
    Ascension Day
    Ash Wednesday
    Audet 1996
    Augustine
    Bakker 1993
    Balabanski 1997
    Bammel 1996
    Baptism
    Baptism Of Christ
    Baptism-of-the-lord-b
    Bauckham 1984
    Bauckham 2006
    Beale 1984
    Belonging
    Ben-Amos 1999
    Betz 1996
    Biesenthal 1893
    Bigg 1904
    Bigg 1905
    Blomberg 1984
    Boehme-2010
    Botha 1967
    Botha 1993
    Braaten 2007
    Bruce1988
    Bruce-1988
    Bryennios
    Butler 1960
    Canonicity
    Capon1998
    Capon-1998
    Carr 2010
    Carson-1991
    Carson-moo-2005
    Catholicism
    Cerfaux 1959
    Chilton 1984
    Christmas-1b
    Christmas-1c
    Christmas Dawn
    Christmas-day
    Christmas Eve
    Christmas Midnight
    Chronicles
    Circumcision And Naming Of Christ
    Cody 1995
    Colossians
    Confession Of Peter
    Confessions
    Connolly 1932
    Connolly 1933
    Connolly 1934
    Constanza-2013
    Court 1981
    Culley 1986
    Daly 1978
    Daniel
    Danielou 1956
    Davids 1984
    DeHalleux 1996
    Dehandschutter 1995
    Deuteronomy
    Didache
    Diversity
    Dix 1933
    Dix2005
    Dix-2005
    Doane 1994
    Draper
    Draper 1984
    Draper 1989
    Draper 1995
    Draper-1996
    Draper-1997
    Draper-2000
    Draper-2006
    Due 2003
    Easter-2
    Easter-2a
    Easter2b
    Easter-2c
    Easter-3
    Easter-3a
    Easter-3b
    Easter-3c
    Easter-4
    Easter-4a
    Easter-4b
    Easter-4c
    Easter-5
    Easter-5a
    Easter-5b
    Easter-6
    Easter-6a
    Easter-6b
    Easter-6c
    Easter-7
    Easter-7a
    Easter-7b
    Easter-7c
    Easter-b
    Easter-day
    Easter-monday
    Easter-sunday-a
    Easter-sunday-c
    Easter-sunrise
    Easter-tuesday
    Easter-wednesday
    Ecclesiastes
    Eleutheria2014
    Elman-1999
    Ephesians
    Epiphany
    Epiphany-1c
    Epiphany-2-a
    Epiphany-2c
    Epiphany-3-a
    Epiphany-3b
    Epiphany-3c
    Epiphany-4-a
    Epiphany-4b
    Epiphany-4c
    Epiphany-5-a
    Epiphany-5b
    Epiphany-5c
    Epiphany-6-a
    Epiphany-6c
    Epiphany-7-a
    Epiphany-c
    Epistle-of-barnabas
    Esther
    Eucharist
    Eve-of-the-circumcision-of-christ
    Exodus
    Exodus-20
    Eybers 1975
    Ezekiel
    Ezra
    Fagerberg1988
    Fagerberg-1988
    Farrell-1987
    Flew-2007
    Flusser-1996
    Forde-2007
    Fraade-1999
    France-2007
    Galatians
    Garrow 2004
    Genesis
    Gero 1977
    Gibbins 1935
    Gibbs 2006
    Glover-1958
    Gonzalez-2010
    Good-friday
    Grosvener-schaff-1885
    Grosvenor-1884
    Guardian-of-jesus
    Habakkuk
    Haggai
    Hagner 1984
    Harnack-1884
    Harris 1887
    Harris 1984
    Hearon 2004
    Hearon 2010
    Hebrews
    Henderson1992
    Henderson-1992
    Henderson 1995
    Hezser 2010
    History
    Hoffman-1986
    Holy Cross Day
    Holy-innocents
    Holy-saturday
    Horsley 2010
    Hosea
    Hutchens2013
    Hymes-1994
    Infertility
    Isaiah
    Jaffee-1999
    James
    James Of Jerusalem
    James The Elder
    Jeffreys-1986
    Jeremiah
    Jerome
    Job
    Joel
    John
    Jonah
    Jones & Mirecki 1995
    Joseph
    Joshua
    Jude
    Judges
    Jungmann-1959
    Justin-martyr
    Kelber-1987
    Kelber-1995
    Kelber 2002
    Kelber 2010
    Kelber & Sanders 2010
    Kevil
    Kings
    Kleinig-2013
    Kloppenborg 1979
    Kloppenborg 1995
    Koch2010
    Kolb2000
    Kolb-2000
    Kolbarand2008
    Kolb-arand-2008
    Kurekchomycz2009
    Lamentations
    Last-sunday-of-the-church-year
    Last-sunday-of-the-church-year-a
    Last-sunday-of-the-church-year-b
    Last-sunday-of-the-church-year-c
    Layton 1968
    Lectionary
    Lent-1
    Lent-1-a
    Lent-1b
    Lent-1c
    Lent-2
    Lent-2-a
    Lent-2b
    Lent-2c
    Lent-3
    Lent-3-a
    Lent-3b
    Lent-3c
    Lent-4
    Lent-4-a
    Lent-4b
    Lent-4c
    Lent-5
    Lent-5-a
    Lent-5b
    Lent-5c
    Lessing2014
    Lessing-2014
    Leviticus
    Lincoln-1885
    Lindemann 1997
    Livesey 2012
    Long-2009
    Lord-1986
    Lord-1987
    Lord's Prayer
    Luke
    Luther
    Maas-2014
    Maccoull-1999
    Maier 1984
    Malachi
    Mark
    Marty-2016
    Martyrdom Of John The Baptist
    Martyrs
    Mary Magdalene
    Mary Mother Of Our Lord
    Mason-1998
    Matthew
    Matthias
    Mazza-1996
    McDonald 1980
    McDonnell & Montague 1991
    McKean 2003
    Mcknight-2014
    Micah
    Middleton 1935
    Milavec 1995
    Milavec-2003
    Milavec2012
    Miller 2019
    Mitch-2010
    Mitchell 1995
    Molina-evers-1998
    Monday-in-holy-week
    Montenyohl-1993
    Morris-1992
    Motyer-1993
    Mueller-2006
    Music
    Nahum
    Nehemiah
    Neufeld-1999
    Newsletter
    Newtestament
    New Testament
    Niditch-1995
    Niditch 2003
    Niederwimmer-1982
    Niederwimmer 1995
    Niederwimmer-1996
    Numbers
    Obadiah
    Oldtestament
    Old Testament
    Olsen-1986
    Ong-1987
    Ong-1988
    Ong-1995
    Oralit
    Orality
    Ordination
    Orphan-hosting
    Osborne-2002
    Osborne-2013
    Ozment1980
    Ozment-1980
    Palm-sunday
    Palm-sunday-a
    Palm-sunday-c
    Pardee 1995
    Parks-1986
    Passionb
    Pearce-1993
    Pentateuch
    Pentecost-10a
    Pentecost-10b
    Pentecost-10c
    Pentecost-11a
    Pentecost-11b
    Pentecost-11c
    Pentecost-12a
    Pentecost-12b
    Pentecost-12c
    Pentecost-13a
    Pentecost-13b
    Pentecost13c
    Pentecost-13c
    Pentecost-14a
    Pentecost-14b
    Pentecost-14c
    Pentecost-15
    Pentecost-15a
    Pentecost-15b
    Pentecost-15c
    Pentecost-16
    Pentecost-16a
    Pentecost-16b
    Pentecost-16c
    Pentecost-17a
    Pentecost-17b
    Pentecost 17C
    Pentecost-18a
    Pentecost-18b
    Pentecost 18 C
    Pentecost-19a
    Pentecost-19b
    Pentecost 19 C
    Pentecost-1a
    Pentecost-20a
    Pentecost-20b
    Pentecost 20 C
    Pentecost-21a
    Pentecost-21b
    Pentecost 21 C
    Pentecost-22a
    Pentecost-22b
    Pentecost 22 C
    Pentecost-23a
    Pentecost-23b
    Pentecost 23 C
    Pentecost-24a
    Pentecost-24b
    Pentecost-24-c
    Pentecost-25b
    Pentecost-25-c
    Pentecost-26b
    Pentecost-26-c
    Pentecost-2a
    Pentecost-2b
    Pentecost-2c
    Pentecost-3a
    Pentecost-3b
    Pentecost-3c
    Pentecost-4a
    Pentecost-4b
    Pentecost-4c
    Pentecost-5a
    Pentecost-5b
    Pentecost-5c
    Pentecost-6a
    Pentecost-6b
    Pentecost-6c
    Pentecost-7a
    Pentecost-7b
    Pentecost-7c
    Pentecost-8a
    Pentecost-8b
    Pentecost-8c
    Pentecost-9a
    Pentecost-9b
    Pentecost-9c
    Pentecost-b
    Pentecost-c
    Pentecost Eve
    Pentecost Monday
    Pentecost Sunday
    Pentecost Tuesday
    Peterson2010
    Peterson-2010
    Philemon
    Philippians
    Philosophy
    Picirilli 1988
    Pieper1924
    Pieper-1924
    Piper 1947
    Powell 2000
    Preaching
    Presentation Of Our Lord
    Proper-19c
    Proper-20c
    Proper 21C
    Proper 22C
    Proper 23C
    Proper 24C
    Proper 25C
    Proper 26C
    Proper 27C
    Proper 28C
    Prophets
    Proverbs
    Psalm
    Psalms
    Quinquagesima
    Quintilian
    Receptivity
    Reed 1995
    Reformation
    Reformation Day
    Revelation
    Rhetoric
    Rhoads 2010
    Richardson & Gooch 1984
    Riggs 1995
    Romans
    Rordorf 1996
    Rosenberg 1986
    Rosenberg 1987
    Rosenfeld-levene-2012
    Rueger-2016
    Russo 1994
    Ruth
    Saenger 1999
    Sailhamer1992
    Sailhamer-1992
    Sale 1996
    Samuel
    Scaer2004
    Scaer-2004
    Schaff 1886
    Schaff 1888
    Schaff 1889
    Schaff 2014
    Schaff-2014
    Schollgen
    Schwarz 2005
    Seeliger 1996
    Septuagesima
    Sermon
    Sexagesima
    Simon And Jude
    Smith-2009
    Sommerville-2006
    Songofsongs
    St. Andrew
    Stark 1997
    St. Barnabas
    St. Bartholomew
    St. John
    St. John The Baptist
    St Luke
    St Mark
    St Matthew
    St. Matthias
    St Michael And All Angels
    St. Paul
    St. Peter And Paul
    St Philip And St James
    St. Stephen
    St. Thomas
    St. Titus
    Sunday Of The Passion
    Taylor 1888
    TDNT
    Teaching
    Telfer 1939
    Thielman-2010
    Thursday In Holy Week
    Timothy
    Titus
    Transfiguration
    Transfiguration-a
    Transfigurationb
    Transfiguration-c
    Trinity 1
    Trinity 10
    Trinity 11
    Trinity 12
    Trinity 13
    Trinity 14
    Trinity 15
    Trinity 16
    Trinity 17
    Trinity 18
    Trinity 19
    Trinity 2
    Trinity 20
    Trinity 21
    Trinity 22
    Trinity 23
    Trinity 3
    Trinity 4
    Trinity 5
    Trinity 6
    Trinity 7
    Trinity 8
    Trinity 9
    Trinity-a
    Trinity-b
    Trinity-c
    Trinity Sunday
    Tsang 2009
    Tuckett
    Tuesday In Holy Week
    Tuilier 1995
    Twelftree 1984
    Ty 19
    Van De Sandt 2002
    Van De Sandt 2007
    Van-de-sandt-2010
    Van-de-sandt-2011
    Van De Sandt & Flusser 2002
    Varner 2005
    Veith1993
    Veith-1993
    Veith-sutton-2017
    Vikis-Freibergs 1997
    Visitation
    Voobus 1969
    Warfield 1886
    Wasson & Toelken 1998
    Wednesday In Holy Week
    Wenham 1984
    Wenham 1992
    Weston-2009
    Wilson2011
    Wilson-2011
    Wilson20113470b5cf10
    Wolmarans 2005
    Wright 1984
    Ysebaert-2002
    Zechariah
    Zephaniah

Proudly powered by Weebly